The girl in the window Three years ago detectives and a social worker arrived at a dilapidated house in Plant City and made a heartbreaking discovery: A tiny girl living in a dark closet.
Criss Angel escapes as Spyglass crumbles
Thousands on Clearwater Beach watch and wonder as Criss Angel escapes the Spyglass Resort just before the building is demolished in a series of explosions.
Best Super Bowl moment? To commemorate the Super Bowl's return to Tampa Bay next February, we chose 25 nominees for the most memorable play in the championship game's history.
TALLAHASSEE — The high price of gasoline has cracked the once solid wall of antidrilling sentiment in the Florida Legislature.
"I'm tired of spilling blood in the Middle East for oil," said Senate President Ken Pruitt, R-Port St. Lucie, a drilling proponent whose son is a Marine. "If we're going to protect our nation, you've got to protect resources."
Pruitt, who will remain in the Senate after he steps down as president in November, was one of a half-dozen prominent Republican lawmakers who told the St. Petersburg Times they would support offshore drilling with safeguards.
Others include Sens. Mike Fasano of New Port Richey, Mike Haridopolos of Indialantic, J.D. Alexander of Lake Wales, Ronda Storms of Valrico and Rep. Will Weatherford of Wesley Chapel, a likely future House speaker.
But that view is far from universal among the Legislature's Republican majority, suggesting a tense debate should the federal government lift its offshore drilling moratorium in the eastern Gulf of Mexico and leave the issue up to individual states. Just last month Gov. Charlie Crist backed such a plan by Arizona Sen. John McCain, the presumed Republican presidential nominee.
Republicans who oppose drilling include state Sens. Dennis Jones of Treasure Island, Victor Crist of Tampa, Paula Dockery of Lakeland, Alex Diaz de la Portilla of Miami, and state Rep. Ed Hooper of Clearwater. The incoming House speaker, Rep. Ray Sansom of Destin, opposes offshore drilling.
"I earned the title of 'the Sandman' for protecting our white fluffy beaches to attract tourism," Jones said. "Drilling for oil is dirty and nasty and not economical. I don't care if McCain is president. That wouldn't change my mind one bit."
Several hurdles remain before legislators would be in a position to consider the issue, including a rollback of both a Congressional moratorium and a 2006 federal law banning drilling within 125 miles of the Panhandle and more than 200 miles from Tampa Bay.
Florida controls roughly three miles of state waters off the east coast and roughly 10 miles off the west coast. Partly in reaction to the ExxonValdez spill off Alaska in 1989, the state banned drilling in state waters. Later in the 1990s, the Legislature strengthened that ban.
Federal waters are controlled by the federal government, but McCain favors lifting the moratorium and leaving drilling up to individual states. Crist agrees — with appropriate but yet unspecified environmental safeguards.
Groups that oppose drilling say it would be a nightmare if the Legislature ever got the power to decide to allow offshore drilling, citing the entrenched influence of many business lobbies on legislative decisions.
"Once the oil industry gets a grip on the state Legislature, they run the show," said Mark Ferrulo, executive director of the liberal-leaning group Progress Florida. "When you look to the degree that deep-pocketed special interests have gotten their way in Tallahassee, the last thing we want to do is give the Exxons and Chevrons of the world that avenue to open up our coast."
It might never happen. Among the most prominent lawmakers who remain staunchly opposed to lifting the bans is Sansom, who represents an oceanfront district in the Panhandle. He and other opponents cite studies that suggest drilling from offshore rigs would take a decade to translate into lower gas prices. Sansom is in Europe this week and could not be reached.
Diaz de la Portilla called offshore drilling a horrible idea and criticized Crist for raising the issue. "To even consider the option is a play on politics by the governor. He is making a big mistake," Diaz de la Portilla said.
A key Republican senator, Jeff Atwater of North Palm Beach, the likely next Senate president, did not return calls for comment. Others like Sen. Evelyn Lynn, R-Ormond Beach and Sen. Don Gaetz, R-Niceville, say support depends on the details. Gaetz is not in favor of any drilling that would interfere with the work of Florida military bases but he's also not ruling offshore drilling out completely.
Fasano argues that Florida's 18-million residents might see a more immediate economic benefit from offshore drilling at 100 miles off the coast if the state could work out a deal that resembles one brokered by Alaska. That state's roughly 670,000 residents each receive $1,000 or more annually from oil companies' payments.
"I'd like to see citizens and taxpayers benefit from any oil found off the shores of Florida," Fasano said. "It has to be done in an environmentally safe way, and there's technology to keep it safe, so we might as well take advantage of it."
>>Fast facts
Castor eyes Alaska
Today the U.S. House is expected to take up a bill co-sponsored by Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Tampa, that calls for more drilling in Alaska, and would force oil companies to use existing leases on federal lands or give them up to other companies. She and other Democrats in Congress are trying to deflect efforts by Republicans to open more of the nation's coastline to oil and gas exploration, so they're offering alternatives like this one. The bill passed the Rules Committee Wednesday.
[Last modified: Jul 18, 2008 12:11 PM]
Comments on this article
by Billv
Jul 18, 2008 12:11 PM
Not on my beach! Only 4 dollar oil will cause energy efficency. In Florida (like Texas) we need to connect wind & solar to the energy grid. I prefer solar... Give me a list of pro drilling GOPers for mail.
by Keith
Jul 18, 2008 12:10 PM
They say we should not drill off-shore because it MIGHT dirty our beaches and affect tourism. If we don't start drilling and become more energy independent, the tourist won't be able to AFFORD TO BUY GAS TO COME TO OUR BEACHES. WAKE UP PEOPLE!
by JR
Jul 18, 2008 10:55 AM
Do any of our politicians know that our oil doesn't stay home? The oil companies sell it on the world market for as much as they can get. Of course, the Pols know. They are paying off their friends -- the oil companies.
by BG
Jul 18, 2008 10:54 AM
It just seems that Bush is out of touch with the General Public, just like his father was. Why do we keep putting these people in office ?
by Joshu Jones
Jul 18, 2008 10:54 AM
Wow, the list reads like Bush's Brown Shirts of Florida. All the GOP wingnuts are there. We hate you! Singed The People of Florida.
by jim
Jul 18, 2008 10:54 AM
Drill offshore! Drill onshore! Drill, Drill, Drill! Otherwise, the only thing that's being "drilled" is your wallet. $10/gal gas will never hurt the Arnolds or Nancys of the world. But it'll really hurt you and your family.It already has. Wake up!
by Bob
Jul 17, 2008 5:35 PM
We must tap into all the oil reserves that are available. The oil platforms will be not be able to be seen from shore. We should have done this along time ago.
by Debbie
Jul 17, 2008 9:46 AM
Yes, let's let our greed and unending demand for finite resources ruin the rest of the US so the oil companies, politicians and special interests can have yet more money. Wake up people. We continue to sell our souls to the devil without thought.
by John
Jul 17, 2008 9:46 AM
At least one Republican, Senate President Pruitt, has admitted that the war in Iraq is about oil.
by russ
Jul 17, 2008 9:46 AM
Our politicians are on crack!The St Pete Times continuing to cite drilling /spill problems from the 70's-'80's is retarded.Drilling/transport technology is light years ahead of those days.America runs on carbons,and EASING into Alt fuels is sanity.
by Jim
Jul 17, 2008 8:10 AM
Oil is a global commodity and will be sold to whomever pays the highest price. Drilling will help no one but the speculators and oil companies. Yes, we will see a benefit, in the form of tar balls on the beaches and spills in the gulf. Goody!
by BG
Jul 17, 2008 8:07 AM
What about the insurable risk to these oil rigs, given hurricanes are prevalent in the Gulf ? Look what they did to the coast of TX and LA. They turned the beaches into an oil pit. It's not just the beaches and preserving wildlife, it's the $ risk !
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.