Make us your home page
Instagram

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Florida Supreme Court rejects lawsuit over solar amendment

A worker installs a solar panel at Duke Energy Florida's new 3.8 megawatt solar array in Osceola County, near St. Cloud. (William R. Levesque | Tampa Bay Times)

A worker installs a solar panel at Duke Energy Florida's new 3.8 megawatt solar array in Osceola County, near St. Cloud. (William R. Levesque | Tampa Bay Times)

TALLAHASSEE — The last-minute attempt by solar advocates to invalidate a utility-backed amendment on the November ballot was rejected by the Florida Supreme Court on Friday.

In two, one-sentence rulings, the court voted 6-1 to reject the lawsuits filed by the Florida Solar Energy Industries Association and Floridians for Solar Choice asking the court to reopen the case involving the ballot language and rule that it was intentionally misleading, in violation of the Florida Constitution. Justice Barbara Pariente dissented.

Citing a report by the Tampa Bay Times/Miami Herald about a leaked audio recording in which the policy director at a Tallahassee think tank supported by the utility industry called Amendment 1 an "act of political jiu-jitzu" that intended to portray the amendment as a pro-solar initiative, the opponents said the recording proved what they had suspected: that the utilities intentionally attempted to trick voters.

The lawsuit claimed the utility companies "withheld relevant and material information as to the objective and intended purpose of the amendment" and therefore misled the court and voters from realizing the true intent was to limit rooftop solar expansion in Florida.

However, in a counter-motion filed early Friday, the proponents of Amendment 1, Consumers for Smart Solar, urged the court to reject the lawsuit, saying it was based on a "false premise."

The court agreed and also rejected a second lawsuit asking for an expedited ruling as moot. Florida law requires that the Supreme Court review all ballot initiatives to determine whether the language is fair and not misleading. Three of the four justices who voted for the ballot language — Chief Justice Jorge Labarga, Ricky Polston and Charles Canady — are on the ballot for a merit retention vote.

The court initially approved the amendment language on a 4-3 vote in March. In a strongly worded dissent, Pariente disagreed, calling the ballot language "a wolf in sheep's clothing" because it is "masquerading as a pro-solar energy initiative."

In opposing the lawsuit, Raoul G. Cantero, lawyer for the utility-backed political committee and a former Supreme Court justice, argued that the only new information to support the claim the amendment was deceptive was the Times/Herald article. He said the allegation was "directly contradicted by the Sponsor's statements in the very same article."

"We are not surprised the Florida Supreme Court dismissed our opponents' frivolous motions, which were only filed to garner attention from the media,'' said Sarah Bascom, spokesperson for Consumers for Smart Solar. "This was nothing more than a political stunt to deter voters' attention in the final days of the election."

Opponents of the amendment said they were disappointed.

"We wanted to give the Court an opportunity to clean up the mess they have made by approving this amendment for the ballot,'' said Stephen Smith, of Floridians for Solar Choice. "Now it's game on: We have a solar uprising happening in the Sunshine State. We ask everyone to 'Vote No On 1' and we look forward to Tuesday, when we will kill this once and for all."

Susan Glickman of the Florida chapter of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, part of the coalition that filed the lawsuit said "voters are starting to realize that the big utility companies are spending millions to mislead them to vote for an amendment that will make it more costly to generate solar power.

"Voters should be mad, and take every opportunity to tell people who have yet to vote 'no' on Amendment 1," she said.

In the leaked audio recording, Sal Nuzzo, a vice president at the James Madison Institute in Tallahassee, told an audience on Oct. 2 that JMI conducted research on behalf of Consumers for Smart Solar in an attempt to establish the foundation for the utility companies' argument that solar users were subsidizing non-solar users.

Cantero attempted to do in court documents what Bascom has done in written statements: distance the proponents from Nuzzo.

"Instead of engaging in a policy debate, the Motion attaches newspaper articles that cite statements by someone named Sal Nuzzo, of the James Madison Institute, about the alleged political motivations behind Amendment 1," he wrote.

Nuzzo's boss, Bob McClure, the president of JMI, said he "misspoke" when he made the claims.

Contact Mary Ellen Klas at [email protected] Follow @MaryEllenKlas.

Florida Supreme Court rejects lawsuit over solar amendment 11/04/16 [Last modified: Friday, November 4, 2016 4:14pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Lightning: Jon Cooper takes unusual tact to create mistmatches

    Lightning Strikes

    Tampa Bay Lightning head coach Jon Cooper argues the called as his team gets a faceoff violation, leading to penalty and #Caps PP goal, during second period action at the Amalie Arena in Tampa Monday evening (10/09/17).DIRK SHADD   |   Times
  2. Editorial: A neighborhood under attack unites

    Editorials

    Three murders in two weeks understandably have Tampa's Seminole Heights neighborhood on edge. But Tampa police and residents are working together to find the killer and are connecting in ways that will strengthen the community in the long run. This is the best reaction to the tragedy of the three deaths, and it should …

    Seminole Heights residents came together in a candlelight vigil Sunday night to pay respect to the families and to demonstrate that they will not be cowed into staying indoors.
  3. Students at middle school pretend to rape black classmates on Snapchat

    Nation

    The Snapchat had just about every offensive topic the middle school students could cram into a video clip: race-based simulated sexual assaults, profanity-laced slurs and repulsive language that shocked whoever the intended audience was - and, eventually, many more people.

    Students at a Virginia middle school pretended to rape other students on video, which was shared on Snapchat. Reports say white members of a football team enacted the rape scenes while in the locker room. This photo of a standard locker room is courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
  4. Seminole Heights restaurants face struggles amid killings, post-Irma

    Food & Dining

    SEMINOLE HEIGHTS — The neighborhood's hip circle of popular, well-regarded restaurants is feeling the squeeze in the wake of a recent killing spree. And the timing is rough.

    Ella's American Folk Art Cafe. Times files
  5. St. Pete-Clearwater holding food, supply drive for hurricane refugees

    Airlines

    CLEARWATER — St. Pete-Clearwater International Airport and Allegiant Air are holding a food and supply drive for the Hispanic Outreach Center in Pinellas County. The event, which will benefit refugees displaced by Hurricane Maria, will be held Tuesday from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. at the airport at 14700 Terminal Blvd.

    St. Pete-Clearwater International Airport and Allegiant Air are hosting a food and supplies drive Tuesday for refugees displaced by Hurricane Maria. | [Times file photo]