Report says Florida can easily absorb more gambling

Gamblers play slot machines in an expanded area of the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Tampa. A report commissioned by the Legislature has determined that Florida is saturated in gambling and expansion would have, at best, a moderately positive economic effect on the state.

EDMUND D. FOUNTAIN | Times (2012)

Gamblers play slot machines in an expanded area of the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Tampa. A report commissioned by the Legislature has determined that Florida is saturated in gambling and expansion would have, at best, a moderately positive economic effect on the state.

TALLAHASSEE — Florida's gambling terrain is already so saturated — particularly in Tampa Bay and South Florida — that the arrival of resort casinos, and even the expansion of slot machines to 23 dog tracks and jai alai frontons, would have "minimal economic" and social impact on the state.

That is the central finding of a $400,000 report done for the Florida Legislature and presented to the Senate Gambling Committee on Monday by Spectrum Gaming Group, a New Jersey research firm hired to assess the economic effects and social costs of expanded gambling in Florida.

"Florida is already a gambling-rich state," Joseph Weinart, executive vice president of Spectrum Gaming, said during a three-hour hearing to discuss the report. The report concludes that "the expansion of casino gambling, whether on a small scale or very large scale, would have, at best, a moderately positive impact on the state economy."

But the most interesting findings of the nearly 1,000-page report may not be about what's to come, but what's already here: One in three Florida adults who live within an hour of a casino gamble there at least once a year, and Florida residents account for 93 percent of the $2.4 billion in estimated revenue collected by existing casinos.

The average Florida gambler spends $866 each year — 16 percent less than the national average, the report concluded.

The Spectrum report is intended to serve as a benchmark for lawmakers as they decide whether to allow the horse tracks, jai alai frontons and dog tracks outside South Florida to install slot machines in place of parimutuel events, and whether to invite mega casinos to come to Florida to build so-called "destination resorts."

Spectrum did not assess the local and regional impact of the expanded games but concluded that "there are likely to be only mild positive impacts on local and statewide employment and wages" because "casinos would not represent a large expansion of their local economies" particularly in larger Florida counties.

An online survey by the University of Florida done for the report found that expanded gambling could draw more tourists. Almost 15 percent of its tourists responded that they would stay longer to gamble, while nearly 4 percent of tourists said they would be less likely to come to Florida if it were a gambling haven. Gambling fans were estimated to spend $412 per person more, the survey found.

Other Spectrum researchers said that most people view gambling as a form of entertainment and that if gambling expands people will shift their disposable income from spending on other forms of entertainment to gambling. That will result in net revenue to the state, since slot machine gaming is taxed at 35 percent while other entertainment options are taxed at the 6 percent sales tax rates.

But if legislators allow expanded gambling, Floridians would continue to make up 93 percent of the casino industry's revenues, said Michael Pollack, Spectrum's managing director. An estimated 5 percent of the revenues come from out-of-state visitors, with nearly 3 percent from Florida's snowbird population.

Those conclusions prompted criticism from legislators who noted that the numbers differ from a 2011 report done by Spectrum on behalf of Genting's Resorts World Miami. The company was aggressively attempting to persuade the Legislature to open the door to three resort casinos in South Florida and predicted they would draw at least 20 percent of customers from out of state.

At the time, Genting promised it would guarantee nonstop flights between Asia and Miami for high-rollers, purchase thousands of Disney tickets for resort patrons and draw thousands of new tourists to Florida.

"We only market to people who already have loyalty cards with other casinos," Colin Au, president of Genting Americas, said in a 2011 interview with the Times/Herald. "Other than that, we get zero money from the local people. It is not a sustainable model in the long run."

Pollock responded that the report didn't take into consideration the aggressive marketing options suggested by the gaming companies.

Those distinctions prompted some legislators to doubt the report.

"There are some real issues about credibility of this report," Sen. John Thrasher, R-St. Augustine, said after the meeting.

Spectrum has close ties to the gaming industry and has done work for the states of Pennsylvania and Massachusetts and performed three modeling exercises to determine what effect expansion of gambling would have on the state economy. Because of incomplete analysis, the company is revising its report to include updated numbers on the potential tax revenue from expanded games, Pollack said, and the new numbers will not affect the conclusion that expanded gambling will have a modest impact.

Gaming report

By the numbers

1-3 Florida adults who live within an hour of a casino who gamble there at least once a year.

93% How much of the $2.4 billion in estimated revenue collected by existing casinos comes from Florida residents.

$866 How much the average Florida gambler spends each year — 16 percent less than the national average.

Report says Florida can easily absorb more gambling 10/07/13 [Last modified: Monday, October 7, 2013 11:30pm]

© 2014 Tampa Bay Times

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...