Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
We were unable to send your email.
Click here to try again.
Lunsford's pain vivid in documentary 'Jessie's Dad'
By
Stephanie Garry, Times Staff Writer
In print: Saturday, May 3, 2008
GAINESVILLE — Mark Lunsford talks to a camera in a dimly lit hotel room. He stumbles to explain why he broke up with his girlfriend. Even in intimate moments, he's haunted by Jessica, his 9-year-old daughter who was kidnapped, raped and buried alive in February 2005. It's a powerful moment in a new documentary screened Friday at the University of Florida. The film offers an intimate portrait of Lunsford, who rode a wave of sympathy after Jessica's death until he threatened to sue the Citrus County Sheriff's Office earlier this year. It shows Lunsford struggling through relationships, legislative sessions and public scorn. The film offers Lunsford a chance at redemption by casting him as a sympathetic figure. "It's the first time that we get to see Mark Lunsford behind the scenes," said Boaz Dvir, 40, co-director of the film with Rebecca Goldman, 24. "At some point, he became very open." The two graduate students in the University of Florida's Documentary Institute shot 130 hours of footage over a year and a half to produce the 46-minute film titled Jessie's Dad. The film shows Lunsford's relentless effort to pass Jessie's Law — by his count, now in more than 30 states — which requires mandatory minimum sentences for sex crimes against children and tougher reporting standards so law enforcement can better track offenders. But even as he tallies legislative successes, he grows frustrated that the Citrus County Sheriff's Office refuses to admit it did anything wrong after Jessica's disappearance. In an interview on camera, Citrus County Sheriff Jeff Dawsy repeats his assertion that if he could do the investigation all over again, he'd do it the same way. "We did not and we will not change any procedures," Dawsy says early in the story. "We followed the correct procedures." Lunsford's attorney Mark Gelman counters in the film that the sheriff shouldn't have put the command post so close to Lunsford's house, where it could interfere with traffic patterns and evidence. And nearly a year before announcing his intent to sue, Lunsford publicly criticizes the Sheriff's Office before a Washington, D.C., audience. In April 2007, he says the Sheriff's Office focused too much on Lunsford and his father. He says investigators received tips that a sex offender was living across the street. Still, they didn't ask to search inside the house where sex offender John Couey was living. He now sits on death row for killing Jessica. The lonely crusade wears on Lunsford. In one scene, he talks on a cell phone, describing how he often breaks down with a feeling that he can't breathe. Eventually, he decides to go after the sheriff, saying his daughter's death might have been prevented. The suit would have hinged on how long Jessica was alive, still one of the biggest mysteries in the case. Prosecutors were adamant she was killed the same night she went missing, but the autopsy and Couey's confession suggest it could have been days. Stung by the public outcry against the suit, Lunsford insists on camera that he only wanted to change police protocol. "The public is all about criticism, man, I mean bashing, man," Lunsford says. "I mean, a week ago they loved me because I was a child advocate, and I went to all these states and I advocated. But now because we're suing the sheriff's department they don't like me anymore, they think I'm a jerk, a scumbag, money hungry." After meeting with Dawsy, Lunsford agrees to drop the suit and work together. The sheriff admits no wrongdoing. The film is open-ended. The directors may shoot more scenes and make revisions before submitting it to PBS. Times Staff Writer John Frank contributed to this report. Stephanie Garry can be reached at sgarry@sptimes.com or (727) 892-2374.
[Last modified: May 04, 2008 11:38 PM]
Comments on this article
|
by Mary Ellen
|
May 4, 2008 11:38 PM
|
|
I never blamed him for suing the sheriff. I thought he should have stuck to his guns and went for it. I do believe there were mistakes made. For one thing what ever happened with the dogs? Were they not allowed to do a proper search?
|
|
by James
|
May 4, 2008 11:37 PM
|
|
I've never commented on the Lunsford subject before. 1st off, My deepest sympathies to the Lunsford family. I haerd the interview with Bubba. I think this PBS show is the best thing Mr. Lunsford could have done to make his point & defend his
|
|
by Mark
|
May 4, 2008 12:34 PM
|
|
It has been three years. It is time for him to move on.
|
|
by Debbie
|
May 4, 2008 11:52 AM
|
|
Mark dont get a big head,Im sure all the people dont LOVE you,its not about MARK its about what happen to this poor little innocent child,its about JESSIE,the sheriff did a great job so stop this nonscence now,let this baby girl be.R.I.P "Jessie
|
|
by Mike
|
May 4, 2008 11:42 AM
|
|
Mr. Lunsford, we've always thought you were a scumbag. The difference was that everyone felt sorry for you. That's no longer the case.
|
|