Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

Chink in pointless law gives kids hope

By Sue Carlton, Times staff writer
In print: Saturday, September 27, 2008


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

If you are qualified to be a foster parent in Florida, willing to take in one of our many kids in need, and you also happen to be gay, no big deal.

Our state could use the help.

But try this on for hypocrisy.

If you want to adopt a child, one of thousands in need of a stable, loving, permanent home, and acknowledge you are gay, sorry.

Thanks but no thanks.

A section of a Department of Children and Families adoption application, just below the entry for "Arrest Record," separates you from the rest of the world: Section 63.042(3), F.S., states that "no person eligible to adopt under this statute may adopt if that person is a homosexual."

I am a homosexual. YES/NO.

Ours is one of the only states to ban gay adoption regardless of how stellar a parent someone might make. This pointless, politically charged law puts us, in terms of practicality and true concern for the welfare of kids, right up there with Mississippi.

But even here in Florida, we get glimmers of hope. Just ask the dad from Key West.

He is not identified by name in court records, but he is a 52-year-old lawyer who is openly gay and in a longtime committed relationship. He has cared for more than 30 kids in state custody.

A boy with special needs was placed in his home in 2001. Ultimately the man was granted permanent guardianship. But the boy, 13, wanted him to be his "forever father," as he said at a hearing.

Why does that final dignity matter so much?

A lawyer who served as co-counsel in the case explained it this way: At a routine doctor's appointment, the man would be asked if this was his son. He would have to answer no.

"He described so powerfully just how absolutely deflated the child would get every time he heard that," says Miami Beach attorney Elizabeth Schwartz.

The man went to court. Reports on him, his home and his ability to be a good father were glowing. Monroe County Circuit Judge David J. Audlin Jr. ruled the gay adoption ban unconstitutional.

The Attorney General's Office doesn't plan to appeal the judge's decision, and without appeal, it likely will not be binding elsewhere. Similar cases have gone nowhere over the years in terms of changing the law. But lawyers hope the judge's well-reasoned ruling can be used as persuasive argument in other cases. A chink in the armor is at least a start.

Why the fear? Chris Card, who has had just about every job you can think of in child welfare, says this: "In my career, I've been involved in lots of child abuse cases and have removed children from lots of different homes due to abuse and neglect. I've not removed a child that I recall from a gay couple."

Statewide, more than 3,000 kids are available for adoption. Yearly, some 800 "age out," which is a too-kind term for those who leave state supervision at 18 without having been adopted.

How many might have fared otherwise if the law made more sense?

"We've got too many kids that need parents," Card says. "We should take anybody who's capable and interested." Judges and child advocates who deal with the raw need tend to echo that.

In spite of everything, in a county south of us, a boy got his forever father. Maybe there's hope for us, too.



[Last modified: Sep 30, 2008 03:45 PM]



Comments on this article
by Steve Sep 30, 2008 3:45 PM
The state needs to repeal that law and let gay people adopt. I bet nearly half of those 3,000 kids would be adopted in the first year or two. But, everyone pays the price of bigotry. Remember that when Ammendment 2 is staring you in the face in Nov.
by Tina Sep 30, 2008 2:21 PM
I never understood why the state would rather allow people like that (straight) couple in Citrus who starved their kids to adopt and then ban it for good parents liek the 2 Dads in Pasco that almost lost the kids they raised b/c they couldn't adopt.
by joetampa Sep 29, 2008 2:49 PM
Paying people to raise kids is a terrible idea. The state can not do a good job of this, and we see constant reminders in the news.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT