Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
TAMPA — The family of a man who died after downing more than 20 vodka shots at a Seffner bikini bar may have a tough battle ahead if they pursue a legal case.
Criminal or civil penalties in such cases are rare in the Sunshine State. Florida is one of only three states that do not have a dram shop law, which forbids bartenders from serving intoxicated people. The state places much of the responsibility on the customer, legal experts say.
In this case, that customer was Eric Morris, a 26-year-old bouncer at Angels Showbar who died after taking shots of cherry-flavored vodka at the club.
"The family is in fact — and the legal institution is — pretty much kneecapped as far as what can happen," said Don Murray, head of Florida's chapter of the advocacy group Mothers Against Drunk Driving. "Now, apparently, you can legally drink until you're dead."
Murray and others have lobbied the Legislature for changes in the state's laws that would shift more responsibility to bars and bartenders for ensuring that patrons don't drink dangerously. So far, it's been a losing battle, he says, mainly because "Florida is the state where people pay to come and party."
A study published in 2002 by the Boston University School of Public Health found that nationwide more than 1,300 Americans die annually either as the direct result of alcohol poisoning or in incidents in which alcohol overdose was considered a contributing factor. The most current state statistics available show that from 2004 to 2006, accidental alcohol poisoning killed only one person in Hillsborough County.
Nevada and Vermont are the other states that do not impose liability on a bartender or a bar, said Stetson University College of Law professor Tim Kaye.
"Florida has taken the view that the duty is really on the drinker," he said.
The only restriction on bartenders in state law says bars must not serve someone who is habitually addicted to alcohol, he said.
Morris' sister has said he was a social drinker who sipped beer.
It was just after 5 p.m. Tuesday when Morris started taking shots at the bar off U.S. 92 after a friend challenged him to a drinking contest.
The bartender cut him off somewhere after 23 shots. Morris collapsed in the bar's champagne room and died at Brandon Regional Hospital.
His family members declined to comment about whether they plan to pursue a legal case, and the Hillsborough Sheriff's Office says it's still investigating the matter. Prosecutors declined to comment, and an autopsy report is not yet available.
Sheriff's officials have said that bars do not have a legal restriction on how much alcohol they can serve to customers. The agency has a voluntary program to teach safe serving practices, but sheriff's spokesman J.D. Callaway said it was unclear whether Angels Showbar took part.
State officials, too, said there was little chance the bar would face repercussions.
"There are no regulations within our jurisdiction that pertain to the tragic incident at Angels Showbar," said Alexis Antonacci, spokeswoman for the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. The state's Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco falls within that department.
Antonacci said bars face consequences for underage drinking, for not paying taxes and for obtaining alcohol from someplace other than a distributor, but not for something like Morris' death.
Angels Showbar has been investigated five times in 2007 and 2008, Antonacci said. The bar's license was suspended from Jan. 25 to Jan. 28 for a "B-girl" violation, which means that female employees of the bar solicited patrons to purchase alcoholic drinks for them. The club also was fined $1,000. Four of the five investigations centered on similar complaints.
The most recent complaint was that the bar refilled liquor bottles with something other than what was printed on the label. On April 16, a state agent visited the bar and did not see any evidence to support that complaint, records show.
The news of Morris' death shocked other local bars.
At the Dubliner, a Hyde Park pub, employees participate in a program that deals with legal issues that surround serving alcohol, said owner Richard Campion. It's not required by the state, but it helps reduce insurance rates and protects the business' license, he said.
He couldn't believe any bar would serve a patron more than 20 shots of vodka.
"It's just odd to me that something like that could happen," he said.
News researcher John Martin contributed to this report. Abbie VanSickle can be reached at vansickle@sptimes.com or (813) 226-3373.
[Last modified: Jul 02, 2008 10:00 PM]
Comments on this article
by Rickster
Jul 2, 2008 10:00 PM
Florida Law DOES hold establishments responsible for serving someone who is obviously over the limit.
Had he gotten in his car and killed someone, they'd be coming after the bar, too.
I think because he was the only 'victim' it lessens the chance.
by T
Jul 2, 2008 4:32 PM
Haven't there been cases in Florida where bars are sued after DUI accidents because they served the intoxicated person? How is this really any different? If they're liable for the person's actions in one instance, they should be in both.
by Marian
Jun 30, 2008 1:33 PM
Then why are there sting operations to make sure convenience store clerks do not sell alcohol to an intoxicated person? Isn't it a similar situation? A bar should not be allowed to sell alcohol to someone intoxicated.
by joe tampa
Jun 29, 2008 1:27 PM
Alcohol is a well known addictive drug. Where is the outrage from anti-drug nuts?
by bird
Jun 28, 2008 8:53 PM
People should be responsible for their own actions. Blaming others, especially legally, is ruining this country.
by citizen
Jun 28, 2008 8:53 PM
If bars/restaurants became legally liable for alcohol consumption, then in this litigious society I don't think one would stay in business due to DUI/drunk driving accident victims suing them as well as the perpetrators. Self responsibility.
by burton
Jun 28, 2008 8:53 PM
Why don't we just start holding idiots accountable for their own behavior? A busy bartender shouldn't have to try to keep up with how many drinks each of the patrons has.
by Cosmo
Jun 28, 2008 8:53 PM
Why is MADD sticking their nose into this? There was no driving involved. They remind me of one of the old Christina Temperance societies from the Prohibition days
by kathy
Jun 28, 2008 8:53 PM
Come on 20 shots!! Over several hours. I agree with personal responsibility but that went out the window after the 5th or 6th shot. That is over the top the business has to bear some of that, that was wrong to serve anyone that many shots.
by tom
Jun 28, 2008 8:53 PM
the right to be stupid is exercised more often than any Constitutional right.
this guy was a bouncer. worked at the bar. He knew full well that drinking too much could mean alcohol poisoning or dying.
by Harry
Jun 28, 2008 8:52 PM
When you get hit by a train, it's not the caboose that kills you. This guy killed himself. Sorry.
by Rod
Jun 28, 2008 8:52 PM
Conundrums: We don't want the government telling us how to live, yet we want laws to protect us from our own stupidity. We act the fool, but fault those peripheral for our imprudence.
by Bob
Jun 28, 2008 8:52 PM
I'm with Mark. It's like saying Dunkin Donuts should have stopped me from eating a dozen donuts a day because now I weigh 300 pounds.
by Rickster
Jun 28, 2008 6:39 AM
I am shocked that getting a liquor license does not require more responsibility than paying the proper taxes and fees.
Did they expect him to get in his car and drive home??
That's a law that needs some rewriting.
by HCB
Jun 28, 2008 6:39 AM
It's illegal to sell someone ANY cocainemor, even, marijuana. Why shouldn't it be illegal to sell alcohol in shots to a drunk while knowing the amount consumed in front of the seller is dangerous or lethal?
by Mark
Jun 28, 2008 6:39 AM
It is called personal responsibility. If you play you pay.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.