Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
On Wednesday, it will be five years since the start of the U.S. war on Iraq. Here is a rundown of where it stands.
How many troops are deployed?
About 155,000. Under current plans, there would be about 140,000 in 15 brigades by the end of July. However, an increase in violence might slow the withdrawal of most of the 28,500 extra troops deployed last year. Gen. David Petraeus, the U.S. commander in Iraq, will present his recommendations to Congress next month. The multinational force includes 9,895 troops from 26 other nations, likely to drop to 7,000 by midyear.
There are about 200,000 Iraqi military and national guard troops, although the "effective" number is lower. Including police and the border patrol, there are about 425,000 security forces. U.S. officials estimate there are 25,000 insurgents, the Iraqis say 40,000, plus 150,000 supporters. That includes 800 to 2,000 foreign fighters.
How many U.S. soldiers have died in the conflict?
As of Sunday, at least 3,988 members of the U.S. military had died, according to an Associated Press count. At least 3,241 died as a result of hostile action, according to the military. About 29,400 troops have been wounded in action. More than 31,000 others were treated for noncombat injuries and illness.
What about civilian deaths?
Estimates vary widely. War-related violence has killed at least 75,000 Iraqi civilians. Iraq Body Count, a British group that uses media accounts, estimates between 82,000 and 89,000. A controversial Johns Hopkins study put the toll at roughly 600,000 just between 2003 and 2006, with an additional 54,000 dying of diseases and other causes. A World Health Organization study estimated that 151,000 died during the same period. Deaths have been dropping the past six months, after peaking in fall 2007 at more than 3,500 per month. The Associated Press reported that at least 739 Iraqi security forces and civilians died last month.
How much has this cost?
Estimates also vary here. According to the National Priorities Project, a group that examines the local impact of federal spending, it's $502-billion. The Congressional Research Service's estimate is $526-billion. The Pentagon says $406.2-billion through December. War appropriations have risen from $50-billion in fiscal year 2003 to about $135-billion for 2007. In 2003, the White House estimated the cost would be between $50-billion and $60-billion, with Iraqi oil revenue paying for long-term costs. CRS estimates the stepped-up military operations in 2007 cost $10.3-billion a month.
On a wider scale, the Democratic-led Congressional Joint Economic Committee estimated total economic costs were $1.3-trillion for 2002 to 2008. This includes interest on borrowed money, lost investment, veterans' health care and oil market disruptions.
What's happened with the benchmarks of progress?
In January 2007, President Bush announced a new strategy for Iraq, including 18 security, economic and political benchmarks for the Iraqi government to meet. The U.S. troop surge was to improve security enough to allow the government "breathing space" to move toward reconciliation. There are no specific penalties if these goals are not met.
A September 2007 White House progress report indicated that Iraqis had made progress toward 11 of the benchmarks. However, much of the key legislation designed to spur reconciliation among Iraq's Sunni and Shiite Arabs and the Kurds still languishes. The National Assembly reconvenes Tuesday.
Sources: Times wires; Congressional Research Service; Defense Department
[Last modified: Mar 19, 2008 09:16 AM]
Comments on this article
by Samuel
Mar 19, 2008 9:16 AM
4K deaths and 1.4 trillion $--spent by one Bush to avenge another Bush's (Dad) pride for an insult-Shame USA0 lack of morality-leaders steeped in self- & Me-Me-ish. Pray this country will get itse
by Russ
Mar 17, 2008 3:21 PM
I know, lets just pull-out of Iraq, wait for it to get way worse, then go back in again... Oh, I forgot that's what Obama has planned.
by Dick
Mar 17, 2008 3:18 PM
Last night on the "History Channel", the Battle of the Bulge told us exactly what happened and how many casualties we suffered. We took over 80,000 casualties. People today would say surrender.
by JH
Mar 17, 2008 3:17 PM
Our troops are extremely succesful in Iraq. The war is being lost at home. Muslim cab drivers refusing blind passengers w/dogs or if the carry alcohol, media quoting the hamas front group, cair, sharia in canada. That's where the losses are.
by MrEthiopian
Mar 17, 2008 2:42 PM
Mike if you want republican lies then tune into FOX.
by neil
Mar 17, 2008 2:36 PM
Jon, when they say biggest foreign policy blunder, consider that this isn't over yet by a long shot. w's blunder is still unfolding with all it's insidious consequences. I am surprised ANYONE is still so ignorant as to support him!!! S
by Jon
Mar 17, 2008 2:35 PM
That last one should be....via American spies. 4. Losing China to communism.
It's hard to envision Iraq going so south that it would rise to the level of disaster of any of the above - Especially German rearming. Heck WWII was NOT nec
by neil
Mar 17, 2008 2:34 PM
a suicide bomber again today with 42 more dead while Cheney and McCain are in town. Hah! We are SURE making progress there aren't we. Can't you wait for McCain to keep us there for "one hundred years"? (his own quote) We
by Jon
Mar 17, 2008 2:17 PM
Hussein's Incitement of the Islamic world to violence against America by constant propaganda on the effects of UN sanctions, America's role and goals in implementing them are directly responsible for 9/11.
by Jon
Mar 17, 2008 2:17 PM
As for the "Biggest foreign policy blunder" dogma: you really have to be ignorant of history to think that.
1. Inciting the British into the War of 1812.
2. Allowing Germany to rearm after 1933
3. USSR getting the Nuke via America
by Jon
Mar 17, 2008 2:12 PM
Well, in the 5 years we have managed to rid the world (literally) of Saddam Hussein. Without Saddam and his government's policies there likely never would have been a 9/11. Incitement to violence is a recognized international crime.
by Kim
Mar 17, 2008 1:48 PM
Are there any gains to this 5 years of conflict??????
American lives (our greatest treasure) aren't worth this!!!
by Greg
Mar 17, 2008 1:47 PM
Death to America from your friends at the Times!
by Johnny
Mar 17, 2008 1:43 PM
I would love to hear what positive aspects have come out of nearly 4000 Americans losing their lives, 30000 being wounded and so many coming home with emotional issues. Are we safe from terror now? Add the 4000 to the 3000 at the WTC. 7000? Geez!
by DJ
Mar 17, 2008 1:43 PM
Couldn't disagree more ... report includes a wide array of stats (from Pentagon too), and citizens deserve to know how/where/how much $ is being spent.spent
by Brian
Mar 17, 2008 1:40 PM
Soldiers are dying for the sake of starting schools?? I haven't heard that one yet.
by Gary
Mar 17, 2008 12:10 PM
The biggest blunder in the history of the American Presidency. George W. Bush's invasion of a country that posed no threat to us to establish a foothold in an oil-rich, illiterate third world nation is our last effort at colonialism, thank
by Mike
Mar 17, 2008 10:25 AM
CONT...Mike \Tampa
Please try and offer the American People some of the Positive that comes from our effrots instead of reporting only the negative in order to push a political agenda. Media is tearing apart the very fabric of our Great Country..
by Mike
Mar 17, 2008 10:24 AM
Look "Times Staff" We know war is dangerous. We know people die for freedom. Im tired of left wing reporting.Tell me How many schools where opened?How many school books that dont preach hate for us?How many people got water? Power?
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.