Multimedia report
Owning vs. renting
The end of the real estate boom has led to a community mix that some owner-occupants say they didn't bargain for. See detailed, clickable maps with data for your neighborhood.
- More multimedia reports
|
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
We were unable to send your email.
Click here to try again.
Drug smugglers turn to semisubmersible vessels
By
David Adams, Times Latin America Correspondent
In print: Friday, April 11, 2008
|
U.S. Coast Guard officials say this vessel was carrying 5.5 tons of cocaine worth $352-million when it was intercepted in August off the coast of Central America.
|
 |
|
[U.S. Navy]
|
|
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
[Associated Press (2000)]
A police officer walks through a vessel under construction in a rural town in Colombia in 2000. Law enforcement officials believe drug cartels are now using an increasing number of similar but smaller vessels to smuggle cocaine.
|
Related Links
|
Drug enforcement officials are scratching their heads over how to combat the latest innovation in drug smuggling: radar-dodging semisubmersible vessels packed with tons of cocaine.
Two years ago, U.S. counter-drug surveillance spotted only three semisubmersibles, but that rose to 40 last year and could reach 120 before 2008 is done. But spotting them is easier than catching them.
Only eight have been intercepted in the past 15 months — one captured and the others scuttled. Colombian officials have nabbed seven empty craft on land before they were loaded with drugs.
Meanwhile, as the armada grows, the amount of cocaine seized by authorities dropped 25 percent last year — 208 tons, down from 257 tons in 2006.
"As the drug cartels adapt, we need to get ahead of their thinking — we have to be innovators ourselves," said Adm. James Stavridis, head of the U.S. Southern Command, based in Miami. "We need wide area surveillance systems, acoustics, and better intelligence tools to stop this emerging pattern of smuggling."
The low profile of the custom-built vessels, which cut through the water at wave height, makes them hard to detect on radar. Sometimes they hide in the shadow of fishing boats.
The vessels are designed and built in Colombia; officials there recently uncovered a clandestine shipyard deep in the jungle.
U.S. Coast Guard Commandant Thad Allen believes the semisubmersibles are a response to the United States' tactic of using snipers in helicopters to shoot out engines of the speedboats, long the smugglers' preferred means of transport. The submersibles' engines are harder to hit as they are wrapped in steel casing below the water line.
"They stay just enough above the water to obtain air for the engines and the crew," said Zachary Mann, of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Usually staffed by a two- or three-man crew, and able to carry up to 10 tons of cocaine at a time, they can plough through the sea at about 8 mph with a range of up to 2,000 miles, according to officials at Southern Command.
U.S. counter-drug surveillance efforts rely on advanced "over the horizon" ground and airborne radar systems, including Customs' long-range P-3 Orion aircraft flying out of Jacksonville and Corpus Christi, Texas.
"They are really the eyes and ears in the sky," said Mann. "We can see a lot with them. They can really reach out and touch someone."
When a suspicious craft is detected, U.S. Coast Guard cutters are deployed to the scene to give chase.
The sudden surge in numbers signaled that traffickers had switched tactics, say analysts.
"What this shows is a real onslaught in the use of this new technology," said Bruce Bagley, a drug expert at the University of Miami. "It makes you wonder how many are making it to their destination."
The U.S. Coast Guard made the first seizure of a semisubmersible in November 2006. It was captured 90 miles off the Pacific coast of Costa Rica. Officials dubbed it "Bigfoot" — the existence of such craft had been rumored, but no one had actually seen one.
In August 2007, the U.S. Coast Guard intercepted another off the coast of Guatemala and arrested the crew after they scuttled the 50-foot-long vessel, estimated to be transporting 5.5 tons of cocaine.
One analyst described the vessels, estimated to cost $1-million to $2-million each, as 21st century "ironclads," referring to the steel-hulled warships of the Civil War.
"Somebody has made a huge investment in the manufacturing of them," said Adam Isacson, an expert on U.S. drug policy in Colombia at the Center for International Policy. "But the profit margins are so high this doesn't eat into them so deeply."
Prosecution of crews from scuttled vessels is hard because of the lack of drug evidence. So, the Coast Guard is seeking legislation that would make the use of "unflagged" semisubmersibles in international waters punishable by up to 20 years in prison.
"There's really no legitimate use for a vessel like this," says Allen, of the Coast Guard.
Information from the Associated Press was used in this story.
. fast facts
Inside a semisub
Semisubmersibles used by drug smugglers typically contain three rooms: an engine room, berthing/bridge area, and a cargo hold where the drugs are stored. They have two 500-gallon fuel tanks, with two additional 75-gallon tanks. "These vessels are used for open-ocean transfers," says Zachary Mann of the Customs and Border Protection Service. "None have been sighted off-loading in a port, marina, or beach." While there have been reports that smugglers have offered a significant financial bonus to crews for returning a semisubmersible, officials have no hard evidence that this has occurred.
[Last modified: May 14, 2008 11:50 AM]
Comments on this article
|
by Mike
|
Apr 13, 2008 12:12 PM
|
|
Everyone that has anything to do with illegal drugs should be sent to prison for life. Eventually there will be no one left on the streets to buy this trash.
|
|
by frank
|
Apr 13, 2008 12:01 PM
|
|
great story...back in 1998.
|
|
by Ed
|
Apr 13, 2008 11:58 AM
|
|
Does the DNC have a stake in those subs? Nancy & company just voted for the FARC this week over the Colombian government. Some dems must be getting their cut.
|
|
by tom
|
Apr 12, 2008 12:07 PM
|
|
Legalizing stuff we had 3000 years is OK but this new coke, smack, is irresistible and will spread. The real shame is cops killed.
|
|
by tom
|
Apr 12, 2008 12:07 PM
|
|
Cheney = capo di tutti capi and leaves little for petty crooks. Legalize happiness dust and the rats will come ashore. Let change come slowly.
|
|
by tom
|
Apr 12, 2008 12:07 PM
|
|
Legalize happy dust and the criminals must get ugly. It'll only get (much)worse-drugs is a cottage industry. Keep the joke as is.
|
|
by tom
|
Apr 12, 2008 12:06 PM
|
|
Grabbing the wealth created a rise in crime. The real criminals will never be cited. Maybe we can groom their pets. Wash their Rolls Royces. Spy on their wives.
|
|
by danny
|
Apr 12, 2008 12:06 PM
|
|
Drugs keep our juducial and corrections facilities flowing with money. No drugs and you have a lot less prisoners and a lot less cases for lawyers. It's all about the money!
|
|
by Jason
|
Apr 12, 2008 12:06 PM
|
|
Problem is Joe, they'll use it and our health care system will pay for it. EMS and hospital systems will be strained beyond capacity, crack babies will increase, ect. Legalizing is not the answer.
|
|
by MARC
|
Apr 12, 2008 12:06 PM
|
|
DIDN'T WE LEARN ANYTHING ? WHEN WE TRIED PROHIBITION ??? I AGREE , TAX IT HEAVY THEY WILL STILL BUY IT . WE REALLY NEED THE NEW TAX BASE ...
|
|
by alan
|
Apr 12, 2008 12:06 PM
|
|
when found they should just bomb the vessel out of exzistance,, so the gov dont have to pay to get rid of the mess.and pay for court, food shelter clothing, distroy on site!!!!!
|
|
by Charles McNain
|
Apr 12, 2008 12:06 PM
|
|
Great-drug Lords should be given 'no-bid contracts' to bring coke in the country-Gov. should impose "coke tax"-i.e. 45% of the load value-payable in coke-that could be cut and sole @ McDonalds an
|
|
by Rowdy
|
Apr 12, 2008 12:06 PM
|
|
Oh sure... legalize cocaine and increase the number of DUI drivers by 300%. Get serious.
|
|
by joe
|
Apr 11, 2008 4:13 PM
|
|
Edward beat me to it. Legalize it, tax it. Problem solved. Why fight it. Make it like booze and cigs. Morons will use it and OD, and others will not. I know, I know its all about the children. For that I say "Parenting Skills". I never use
|
|
by jan
|
Apr 11, 2008 2:10 PM
|
|
"we all live in a yellow submarine, yellow submarine, yellow submarine..."
|
|
by Barbara
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:57 PM
|
|
I'm with Edward. Florida needs a new tax base.
|
|
by Chip
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:54 PM
|
|
Mark has the best idea: "Why not classify the submersibles as a terorist weapon then sink then?" Let the guys at MacDill have some legit targets for practice. Of course, ACLU attorneys would probably see that as stifling minority small busi
|
|
by Alex
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:52 PM
|
|
It's time to re-define the word intelligence. Why does it take so long to recognize what's happening and then what to do about it?
|
|
by Jon
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:45 PM
|
|
Mark/Pete instead of upping the "war" how about we just deal with the social issues of cocaine. Killing smugglers is not helping anyone, it just makes it more profitable for the ones that don't get killed.
|
|
by MIKE
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:45 PM
|
|
I LIKE MARK'S IDEA !
|
|
by Wolf
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:44 PM
|
|
Wow, maybe we should hire these guys as "Defense Contractors" to help rebuild our antiquated Navy - there stuff looks better than the DDX!! Plus, they'd make more money from Dick and co. (just ask Northrup-Grumman)
|
|
by Patrick
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:42 PM
|
|
Hi, welcome to a week ago.
|
|
by Ted
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:42 PM
|
|
I'll be more worried when they start smuggling cubans in them.
|
|
by Edward
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:39 PM
|
|
This is all so stupid. Legalize it all, tax the h3ll out of it => completely remove all criminal element (as happened when Prohibition ended). Current public policy, here, is completely broken.
|
|
by John
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:35 PM
|
|
Mark, if you can't spot them how would you sink them? Hehehe.....
|
|
by numi
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:35 PM
|
|
Transport subs will be next.
|
|
by JR
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:32 PM
|
|
When are we going to give up this useless drug war? I'll tell you when. When we get some younger people in government. These older people in gov't don't get it.
|
|
by Darren
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:32 PM
|
|
Upgrade the coastie's sniper weapons and training, then game on. Rounds from a .50 caliber sniper rifle would punch nice sized holes in those tubs. The crews might have time to abandon ship, plus we would be creating new artificial reefs.
|
|
by JH Skyscrapercity
|
Apr 11, 2008 1:31 PM
|
|
What is the American fascination with addressing all issues on the supply side, which is fundamentally useless? Fight the demand for drugs and you can have an impact. Fight supply and you hopelessly waste resources.
|
|
by Steve
|
Apr 11, 2008 9:16 AM
|
|
Oh, man..... I want one, I want one!!!
|
|
by bill
|
Apr 11, 2008 9:16 AM
|
|
the war on drugs, a fool's game that just can't be won! lol moronic drug laws create monsters, wake up people
|
|
by Mark
|
Apr 11, 2008 9:16 AM
|
|
Why not classify the submersibles as a terorist weapon then sink then? If you sink one, would others be so willing to follow? Depth charge them, shoot them up, hit them with missles, ram them with reinforced hull ships. Just sink the bastardos.
|
|
by Pete
|
Apr 11, 2008 9:16 AM
|
|
I told the CG 15 years ago this would happen and they laugh now they are seeing it happen. Why not install floating sonar bouys that signal when they are tripped by these vessels
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
|