Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
  • Owning vs. renting
    The end of the real estate boom has led to a community mix that some owner-occupants say they didn't bargain for. See detailed, clickable maps with data for your neighborhood.
  • More multimedia reports
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message

Instead of biofuel, other global trends starve Haiti

By David Adams, Times Latin America Correspondent
In print: Monday, April 21, 2008


Social Bookmarking [+]
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

When deadly food riots erupted in Haiti this month, experts were quick to blame the United States' policy of harvesting grains to make biofuels.

Using food crops to satisfy the needs of wealthy, gas-guzzling consumers ahead of the starving poor was "a crime against humanity," according to one United Nations official.

Anger and fear over food prices that have climbed an average of 40 percent since last summer are visible worldwide. In Haiti, where rice prices have doubled since last year (50 percent since January alone) at least five people were killed and 25 injured in food riots and clashes with U.N. peacekeepers. The protests led to the ouster of the prime minister this month.

"The last few months have been outrageous," said Gabriel Verret, the president's top economic adviser. "It's the same thing as is happening all over the globe."

But in Haiti biofuels are not the chief villain. Haiti does not use its farmland to produce ethanol or biodiesel, the two main alternative "green" fuels.

"The role biofuels plays in all this is marginal compared to the host of other issues," said Matt Hartwig, spokesman for the Renewable Fuels Association, which represents the ethanol industry. "We don't use rice to make ethanol, nor do we grow corn in rice paddies."

The real culprits — at least in the hemisphere's poorest country — are trade policies that have decimated Haitian agriculture and a catastrophic drought half a world away that has made rice so valuable that paddies in Thailand are under armed guard.

• • •

Before 1950, Haiti produced more than 80 percent of its own food.

But in the 1980s the International Monetary Fund persuaded the Haitian government to reduce its import tariffs. Tons of low-priced U.S. goods, rice in particular, began to flood the docks of Haitian ports. This put many of Haiti's rice farmers out of business. Now, of the 400,000 tons of rice consumed in Haiti each year, three-quarters is imported from the United States.

"Removal of tariff barriers has allowed a handful of northern countries to capture Third World markets by dumping heavily subsidized commodities while undermining local food production," according to Anuradha Mittal, executive director of the Oakland Institute. "This has resulted in developing countries turning from net exporters to large importers of food."

Though most of Haiti's rice comes from the United States, the price has been affected by poor harvests in other parts of the world. For the last six years Australia has been hit by a catastrophic drought, which has seen rice production fall by a stunning 98 percent.

"It may never recover," says Sophia Murphy, who lives in Australia and is a senior adviser at the Minneapolis-based Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.

In times of scarcity, big importers tend to rush to hoard stocks on fears they will not be able to meet domestic demand. Major producers also begin restricting exports to keep domestic prices down. Much of the recent rice crisis came after major exporting nations, including Egypt, Vietnam, India and Indonesia, imposed restrictions on exports. This has drastically reduced available global stocks and caused prices to reach as much as $1,000 per ton.

• • •

While most of the focus in Haiti is on rice, prices of other basic food items, such as vegetable oil, have also risen. In the case of other grains, especially corn and soy, it's hard to ignore the biofuels factor.

One quarter of the U.S. corn crop is used to make ethanol.Although record amounts of corn are being planted — 2007 was the largest crop since 1944 — farmers planted less soy and wheat, pushing prices up on those crops.

But pegging ethanol's impact on food prices is difficult because of the large number of variables involved. Studies have produced estimates as low as 15 percent and as high as 50 percent.

"There's no mathematical formula," said Keith Collins, who recently retired as chief economist at the Department of Agriculture.

The trend of tightening demand in the global grains market began to appear eight years ago, well before the biofuels boom took off, Collins said.

This was due to episodes of bad weather and unprecedented economic growth in countries like China and India that permitted people to buy more and better food.

But biofuels may have tipped the scale.

"Without biofuels you would have had supply meet demand," he said.

Collins predicts the demand for corn will only get worse due to a slew of ethanol plants about to go into production. "It looks to me that we have taken federal policy on biofuels too far and overreached," he said.

Lifting a 54-cent-per-gallon tariff on ethanol imports from Brazil, (which makes its fuel from sugar, not corn), as well as ending a system of tax credits for ethanol blenders in the United States (51 cents per gallon), could help ease the situation.

"Why keep pouring gasoline on the fire?" Collins said. "Let's roll back the incentives and let the market play its role."

The ethanol industry says it's not to blame, pointing the finger instead at the rising price of oil, which hit $115 a barrel last week.

"What people are failing to appreciate is how much oil impacts production of food at every step of the way, from tractors farming the land, to fertilizers, and transporting produce to market," said Hartwig of the renewable fuels group.

"When oil hits $115 a barrel, it's inevitably going to wreak havoc on the world economy."

• • •

All this demand for corn — as food for humans and livestock, as well as fuel — has caused another major problem for poor countries like Haiti.

Growing more corn has meant using more fertilizer. This has helped drive up fertilizer costs 168 percent since 2000, and they are now the highest on record, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Farmers in Haiti say they can't afford to plant new rice crops due to the high cost of fertilizer.

Facing rock-throwing protesters outside the palace gates, Haiti's president, Rene Preval, announced subsidies to cut the cost of rice more than 15 percent. But critics say that may be too little too late.

Preval, an agronomist by training, is asking for urgent international help. The United Nations has offered emergency food supplies targeting children, pregnant women and nursing mothers. The World Bank chipped in $10-million.

To ensure this years' rice harvest Preval said he will ask Venezuela to help provide fertilizer for farmers.

"When you put the rice and the fertilizer situation together — that is what's hurting us," said Verret. "It's a perfect storm."

David Adams can be reached at dadams@sptimes.com.



[Last modified: Apr 22, 2008 11:28 AM]



Comments on this article
by Dan Apr 22, 2008 11:28 AM
It's not that everything is the U.S.'s fault. But clearly, our country has a HUGE impact on the rest of the world. Another point: what about the tons of corn and fuel used to raise a relatively small amount of livestock?
by Curious Apr 22, 2008 9:44 AM
I read an article that made a direct link between Haiti's lack of food and drug trafficking. It said food was rotting at the docks because of rules put in place by government to stop drug trafficking which added red tape to releasing shipments.
by Maria Apr 21, 2008 2:59 PM
Uh...to add more bad news guys...our bees are dying, with them go most of our crops. And the new Bioengineer stuff from Monsanto...total bomb, guys. They don't produce as much as conventional foodcrops....Sigh. Have a nice day.
by Snoz Apr 21, 2008 2:59 PM
US pushed for tarrif cuts in Haiti so US farmers could make $$. US paid its farmers subsidies so US crops cheaper than rest of world. US Bio fuels tax cuts? Now US wants to say, not our problem? Watch your own food bills folks, this is "our pro
by Joe Apr 21, 2008 11:34 AM
Since 1915, the US has ruled Haiti and kept the country in a condition of dependency.The US must stop the occupation of Haiti and let Haitians rule themselves without interference and intimidation. A Free Haiti will solve its problems. Free Haiti!
by GrimReaper Apr 21, 2008 11:34 AM
Hummmm ..... Lets see It's OUR fault that they can't grow their own food. WE pay for our own I don't see the UN kicking in money to lower our bread costs. If food went up THAT much then everyone there could make a buck GROWING THERE OW
by robert Apr 21, 2008 11:34 AM
5000 years ago mother nature solved these global issues.
by John Apr 21, 2008 11:34 AM
It is time America worries takes care of America. Let somebody else take care of Haiti.
by Marty S. Apr 21, 2008 11:33 AM
Have I just witnessed the Times actually quote someone as saying the federal gov't policy on biofuels has gone too far and 'overreached'? How in the world could the editors let this obvious bit of truth slip past them and get out to al
by Wayne Apr 21, 2008 11:33 AM
Yes, as usual it is all the US's fault for the world's problems.
by aaron Apr 21, 2008 11:33 AM
Agraculture grows food to run the Human engine, not the automotive engine. When you use your fuel (food) to run your cars, you are in a lose- loose position. Ethanol from food crops is morally and economically wrong.
by Mike Apr 21, 2008 11:33 AM
Hey Kitty, I agree with you 100%
by Ken Apr 21, 2008 11:33 AM
Ethanol is an outrageous fraud. It has zero net environmental benefit, drives up the cost of fuel, and contributes to price pressures on food for the third world. The Green movement is literally killing people and this is just the beginning.
by Jon Apr 21, 2008 11:33 AM
When did the US become responsible for Haiti? We need to take care of people here first. With the falling dollar, we have people here that need help. Also with gas at nearly $4 per gallon, Seniors and disabled will not be able to afford food.
by keith Apr 21, 2008 11:33 AM
Makes sense let the big guys take care of everything i.e. coporate world and soon you will have chaos-revolt against being forced into corporate slavery
by Ted Apr 21, 2008 11:33 AM
Haiti has never been able to get it right as a country. It has looted by its presidents time and time again.
by frank Apr 21, 2008 11:33 AM
trade policies, biofuel, tariffs... take your pick.
by alan Apr 21, 2008 11:32 AM
where is the rest of the world? the us in not totally responible.
by kitty Apr 21, 2008 8:56 AM
Here's a thought - producers of processed foods should stop adding high-fructose corn syrup to EVERYTHING they make. It's killing people and driving up the cost of everything else, and it's been going on for decades, but only
by Bob Apr 21, 2008 8:55 AM
Mr. Adams' piece focuses on food supply. It ignores demand. Is Haiti overpopulated to the point that its arable land can't supply enough food? Read the literature on exponential population growth, then read Thomas Malthius' ominous
by geezer Apr 21, 2008 8:55 AM
Ethenol using corn was a mistake with huge unintended consequences. We need to follow the lead of the EU and back off from it. There are better alternatives we can develop and we need to start now.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT