Thursday, April 26, 2018
Opinion

Ruth: Constitution Revision Commission ignores the public

You could be forgiven if you thought the Florida Constitution Revision Commission was going to result in a wave of grass-roots populism that would make Bernie Sanders look like an elitist Wall Street snob.

After all, the 37-member commission traveled across the state holding public hearings under a huge banner that read: "Floridians Speak We Listen."

With fingers crossed, perhaps?

That is the problem, isn’t it? Once you start asking the great unwashed what they think, you run the risk members of the public will actually tell you what they think. This charade of pretending you care about public opinion can get awkward.

You could say the CRC’s books were going to be cooked from the beginning. After all, the commission includes Attorney General Pam Bondi and members appointed by Gov. Rick Scott, Senate President Joe Negron, House Speaker Richard Corcoran and three others by Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Jorge Labarga.

This was not exactly shaping up as an Age of Enlightenment exercise, especially after a Scott ally, real estate developer and failed U.S. Senate Republican candidate Carlos Beruff, was named to chair the commission.

The CRC meets every 20 years to revise the state’s guiding legal document. The last time it gathered hardly anyone had heard of Google, and cellphones were at best rudimentary. So you would think the commission would have its work cut out for it to drag the state into the 21st century, since it seems perpetually stuck in the 18th.

After holding its hearings and beckoning the citizenry to offer up its ideas, the CRC announced a few days ago that of the 2,012 public submissions, only six proposals made the cut, or about 0.3 percent of the total citizen input.

Some of the ideas advanced included measures providing Floridians a clean environment, closing a loophole in the homestead exemption that allows felons to hide property assets, a right to privacy provision and another privacy proposal to block certain access to public information.

To be fair, many of the proposals submitted by the public were redundant, or already in the Constitution, or simply stupid.

For example, Floridians already have a right to own firearms — lots of them. And while Florida may not be one of the more progressive states in the union, it is already illegal to try to bribe an elected official. Getting caught is another matter.

The U.S. Supreme Court might look askance at one proposal that any "valid" method of execution should be allowed. Ahem, there are probably parts of Florida where being eaten by wolves would seem perfectly "valid."

Several citizen proposals called for protecting the right to hunt and fish, as if these activities are being threatened. One Floridian called for NASCAR being declared the official state sport. It wasn’t already?

Another civic-minded resident wanted to include a provision in the Constitution of the great state of Florida for a la carte cable television selections. Now there was a free at last, thank God almighty I’m free at last moment for you.

There were some more worthy constitutional amendment suggestions that withered on the vine, like limiting the amount of money corrupting our political system. Good luck persuading Florida’s greased-palmed politicians to say, "No more checks please!"

And the chances were practically nil the CRC would approve a proposed amendment to create a state commission on sea level rise, especially in a state led by a governor who dismisses climate change as a fad.

How about the failed suggestion to have an elected Public Service Commission? Ah, idealistic citizens with a sense of humor.

Still the CRC might want to revisit its rejection of two ideas. One called for the elimination of the office of the lieutenant governor, otherwise known as the state’s official potted plant. Really, now in case you’ve forgotten, we do have a lieutenant governor — Carlos Lopez-Cantera, who has been seen in public less often than J.D. Salinger.

But here’s an idea worthy of reconsideration. This rejected constitutional provision would require the words "None of the Above" to appear for every race on every ballot. If "None of the Above" wins, a new election would be held with none of the losing candidates allowed to run again.

Those citizens can be downright mischievous sometimes.

Comments
Editorial: St. Petersburg’s waste-to-energy to wastefulness project

Editorial: St. Petersburg’s waste-to-energy to wastefulness project

A St. Petersburg waste-to-energy plant now under construction has been billed for years as an environmentally friendly money saver. Now it looks more like a boondoggle, with the cost and mission changing on the fly. It’s yet another example of a city...
Updated: 6 hours ago

‘Happy hour’ tax cuts may result in hangovers

Evidence is mounting that the $1.5 trillion tax-cut package enacted in December by congressional Republicans and President Donald Trump was a bad idea, not only for the long-run health of the economy but for the short-term political prospects of the ...
Published: 04/25/18
Editorial: As USFSP consolidation task force meets, openness and collaboration are key

Editorial: As USFSP consolidation task force meets, openness and collaboration are key

Writing a new law that phases out separate accreditation for the University of South Florida St. Petersburg and folds it back into the major research university was the easy part. The hard work starts today when a new consolidation task force holds i...
Published: 04/23/18
Updated: 04/25/18

Correction

CorrectionCircuit Judge John Stargel of Lakeland is a member of the Florida Constitution Revision Commission who voted against a proposed amendment that would have stopped write-in candidates from closing primary elections. An editorial Saturday inco...
Published: 04/23/18
Editorial: Pruitt sets new low for ethics at EPA

Editorial: Pruitt sets new low for ethics at EPA

Not too many people took then-candidate Donald Trump seriously when he famously campaigned to "drain the swamp" as president. But that shouldn’t give this administration a free pass to excuse the behavior of Scott Pruitt, the administrator of the Env...
Published: 04/22/18
Updated: 04/23/18
Editorial: Allegiant Air still has safety issues

Editorial: Allegiant Air still has safety issues

Allegiant Air’s safety record remains troubling, and the Federal Aviation Administration’s reluctance to talk about it is no more encouraging. Those are the key takeaways from a 60 Minutes report on the low-cost carrier’s high rate of mid-flight brea...
Published: 04/21/18

Editorial: Women’s work undervalued in bay area

Even a strong economy and low unemployment cannot overcome the persistent pay gap affecting full-time working women in Florida. A new report shows women in Florida earned 12.5 percent less on average than their male counterparts, and the disparities ...
Published: 04/21/18
Editorial: Florida’s death penalty fading away on its own

Editorial: Florida’s death penalty fading away on its own

Florida lawmakers may never take the death penalty off the books, but stronger forces are steadily eroding this inhumane, outdated tool of injustice. Court rulings, subsequent changes to law and waning public support have significantly suppressed the...
Published: 04/20/18
Updated: 04/24/18

Editorial: A missed chance for open primary elections

The Florida Constitution Revision Commission did a lot of things wrong this week by combining unrelated or unpalatable provisions into single amendments that will appear on the November ballot. It also wasted an opportunity to do one thing right. The...
Published: 04/20/18
Updated: 04/23/18
Editorial: New Cuba president is chance for new start

Editorial: New Cuba president is chance for new start

For all the symbolism, Raul Castro’s handoff of the Cuban presidency this week amounts to less than meets the eye even if his handpicked successor, the Communist Party functionary Miguel Diaz-Canel Bermudez, is the first person not named Castro to le...
Published: 04/20/18