Saturday, February 24, 2018
Opinion

A Romney victory, if only he'd admit it

Too bad for Mitt Romney and the political cage he inhabits.

Romney's response to the landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold President Barack Obama's health care reform law was to shake his fist, promising to get rid of it "on my first day as president of the United States." Never mind that he would have no power to do so, unless he's running for king.

If Romney hadn't decided that he wants the presidency more than personal integrity, he might have savored the victory for a program modeled after the one he helped establish in Massachusetts as governor — with an individual mandate. It is now pretty popular. Even political independents in the Bay State have grown to embrace the overall program at upwards of 70 percent approval, with 58 percent endorsing the individual mandate. It has cut the number of uninsured residents in the state to less than 2 percent. Compare that to a state like Florida where nearly 4 million people are uninsured, or about 21 percent.

In Massachusetts, it must be tremendously comforting to know that regardless of a job loss or any pre-existing conditions, you and your family will always have access to affordable health insurance. The rest of America won't have too much longer to wait for similar health care security in 2014, as long as the Affordable Care Act remains on the books. Thank you for that, Chief Justice John Roberts!

As to the individual mandate, the requirement that everyone maintain health coverage or pay a penalty, Romney was for it before he was against it. In 2009, Romney said, "Using tax penalties, as we did … encourages free riders to take responsibility for themselves rather than pass on their medical costs to others."

Before Romney followed the right turn of his party, he understood that the individual mandate was the conservative approach to universal coverage and cost containment. It kept private insurers in the game as opposed to Medicare-for-all, an approach I favor but that sends conservatives running for their hammer-and-sickle banners.

As governor, Romney was so enamored with the individual mandate that he vetoed the employer mandate part of the Romneycare program (a veto overridden by that state's Democratic Legislature.) He wanted individuals alone, and not their employers, to shoulder the health insurance requirement. At the time, Romney had no liberty concerns that government was forcing its citizens to buy a product they didn't want. He was more interested in those "free riders."

But now that the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the individual mandate in the ACA under Congress' taxing power, Romney and his allies are spitting mad, promising repeal.

They should be careful what they wish for, because the rest of Roberts' ruling constrains Congress' power to creatively address serious national problems. Conservatives may approve of limiting Congress' Commerce Clause powers and ability to condition federal funds for joint federal-state spending programs, such as Medicaid, on serving more people, but this boxing in of Congress will inevitably lead to a bigger federal government.

No matter how much tea-partiers stomp their feet, America is not going to go back to a time when government consisted of a post office and traveling circuit judge (and, of course, their sacrosanct Medicare, Social Security and veterans' benefits). Inevitably the United States will move toward a more progressive society, haltingly maybe, but universal health care is in this nation's future.

As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg points out in her partial dissent, Congress could have established "a tax-and-spend" single-payer program, but instead chose "a solution that retains a robust role for private insurers and state governments."

If the ACA is repealed, as Romney promises, a progressive Congress down the road may reject an approach that invites states and private insurers to participate, seeing it as risky in light of the court's precedent. That's the warning I have for all those who would see the death of Obama/Romneycare. Get ready for Medicare-for-all.

Comments
Editorial: Improve school security plans with gun controls

Editorial: Improve school security plans with gun controls

Gov. Rick Scott and key members of the Florida Legislature offered ambitious proposals Friday that would plug some holes in the state’s safety net, strengthen school security and spend up to a half-billion dollars in response to last week’s massacre ...
Updated: 11 hours ago
Editorial: Six proposals for reasonable gun control

Editorial: Six proposals for reasonable gun control

Enough is enough. The mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School has renewed conversations about gun control in Washington and Tallahassee. Young people are demanding action, and there are cracks in the National Rifle Association’s solid w...
Published: 02/23/18
Editorial: The time to act on guns is now

Editorial: The time to act on guns is now

The nation’s conversation on guns took an encouraging step this week in three essential places — South Florida, Tallahassee and Washington — as survivors, victims’ families and elected leaders searched painfully and sincerely for common ground after ...
Published: 02/22/18

Editorial: FDLE probe of state fair fiasco falls short

It should go without saying that Florida law frowns upon public officials who take freebies from vendors and whose agency throws business to their family. But that wasn’t enough to move the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to find that the ex-di...
Updated: 12 hours ago
Editorial: They value guns, not kids

Editorial: They value guns, not kids

They value guns over kidsSix days after 17 were killed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High by a teen-ager firing an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle, the Florida House refused to even debate a bill banning the sale of assault weapons. The vote, 71 to 36, wasn...
Published: 02/21/18

Editorial: Nursing home rule should be stronger

It shouldn’t take months or another tragedy for Florida — which is hot and full of seniors — to protect its elderly population from heat stroke in the event of an emergency. That’s why Gov. Rick Scott had the right idea last year in calling for nursi...
Updated: 12 hours ago
Editorial: Listen to Marjory Stoneman Douglas students demanding change

Editorial: Listen to Marjory Stoneman Douglas students demanding change

Students from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School are traveling to the state capital today and declaring "never again.’’ A prominent Florida Republican fundraiser vows he won’t raise another nickel until his party approves new gun controls. Across F...
Published: 02/19/18

Editorial: No more doubt about Russian meddling in election

The latest indictment by the Justice Department special counsel, Robert Mueller, refutes President Donald Trump’s claims that Russian interference in the 2016 election was a Democratic hoax. The indictment details the lengths Russian conspirators too...
Published: 02/19/18

Another voice: Tips should belong to workers, not their bosses

The Trump administration is under fire for proposing a Labor Department regulation that could result in hotel and restaurant employers dipping into the tips customers leave for their employees, depriving the nation’s 14 million hard-working restauran...
Published: 02/18/18
Updated: 02/20/18
Editorial: Trump’s rising deficits and misplaced priorities

Editorial: Trump’s rising deficits and misplaced priorities

It’s not popular in Washington or virtually anywhere else these days to express concern about the rising federal deficit. Congressional Republicans who used to be deficit hawks first voted to cut taxes by $1.5 trillion over the next decade, then rais...
Published: 02/17/18