|
|
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
We were unable to send your email.
Click here to try again.
Bill Maxwell
Before you ban a book, try reading it
By
Bill Maxwell, Times Columnist
In print: Thursday, March 20, 2008
|
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
Related Links
|
Here we go again. Parents are upset with language or a specific word in the books their children are reading at school. This time, as in many other instances nationwide, the offender is the N-word.
Darryl and Alytrice Brown, who are black, want Mildred Taylor's novel, The Land, and Vicki Grove's novel, The Starplace, removed from the accelerated reading list at Turner Elementary School in Tampa. Their daughter, 11-year-old Ashyaa, who is in the gifted program, complained that both books contain the N-word.
In their misguided effort to protect their daughter from a word, these parents would deprive every child at Turner Elementary, now and in the future, of the opportunity to read these two excellent novels. I read both three years ago when I wrote about an attempt in Tuscaloosa, Ala., to remove the novel Summer of My German Soldier from a 10th-grade reading list.
As in many other instances nationwide, the Browns have not read the books in question. The stark irony here, at least to me, is that 44-year-old Darryl Brown is a doctoral student in education at the University of South Florida.
As a former college teacher, a journalist and a parent and grandparent, I am personally familiar with the use of the N-word in literature for children and young adults. I have never seen a case in which parents were justified in wanting an approved book outlawed. In every case I am familiar with, parents or complaining organizations failed to understand the historical context and the utility of using the N-word and other terms designated as being objectionable.
Instead of helping children appreciate the literary value of books and apprehend the intellectual and social nuances of life around them as expressed in books, parent-generated controversies often confuse children, giving them distorted views of reality.
In The Land, Taylor, who is black, explores racism during and after the Civil War in the Deep South. Paul-Edward Logan, son of a white plantation-owner father and a slave mother, is the narrator. He is determined to buy land and shape his own life no matter what.
"Caught between black and white worlds and not fitting into either one is devastating to Paul-Edward, but his powerful, engaging tales of love of family, the strength of friendship, and growing up will inspire anyone to dare to persevere despite terrible odds," one critic writes.
The Browns, obviously, are not inspired by Paul-Edward's perseverance. They are focused instead on the use of the N-word.
Taylor, who has several award-winning children's books to her credit, has written about her use of the epithet: "I have chosen to use the language that was spoken during the period, for I refuse to whitewash history. The language is painful and life was painful for many African-Americans, including my family. I remember the pain."
In The Starplace, Grove, who is white, tells a heart-warming story about the friendship between the white character Frannie, the narrator, and the black character Celeste. Frannie, 13, never thought much about the color of her skin until Celeste moved to the Oklahoma town in 1961 and attended Frannie's school.
When the girls are chosen for a special vocal ensemble, they become inseparable friends. Many other people, including children and adults, cannot accept integration, and Frannie discovers a dark secret from the town's past that challenges her friendship with Celeste. Just before Celeste's first day at school, Frannie says, "Several people who came out to do ranch business with my dad today asked him if that nigger girl was really going to my school."
The Starplace is an inspiring narrative about friendship across the racial divide. Its use of the N-word is an indictment of the ignorance and hatred that defined the South. It is not intended to insult blacks in any way. In the story, it affirms Celeste's dignity.
Not using the N-word, or using a euphemism instead, would destroy the intense realism of Grove's message. Children's Literature Review stated that The Starplace "is a wonderful look at the time just after the Supreme Court decision that was supposed to make segregation history."
Granted, the N-word is offensive to most black parents. But authors such as Taylor and Grove must be permitted to use it in crafting tales that capture authenticity of plot, character and time period.
Only through realistic language — even use of the N-word — can most children appreciate the burden of history and learn valuable lessons.
[Last modified: Mar 24, 2008 01:53 PM]
Comments on this article
|
by Debi
|
Mar 24, 2008 1:53 PM
|
|
When I first read the article, I felt Darryl Brown's career choice was an ironic one. It frightens me for the children and teachers within his future.
|
|
by Kim
|
Mar 24, 2008 10:53 AM
|
|
I am shocked that the parents haven't read the book. Clearly, their ability to read isn't in question, just common sense I suppose. Read the book.
|
|
by Mary-Beth
|
Mar 21, 2008 1:21 PM
|
|
Thank you, Bill, for speaking truth in your eloquent fashion. You are my favorite columnist and I respect everything you stand for. Please continue to point us all forward in our ability to accept and understand one another as Americans.
|
|
by Lisa
|
Mar 21, 2008 12:09 PM
|
|
As a child, I never like the n-word or the sound of it. It horrified me to heard that word & I am white. My children have never heard that word from my lips. The word as mentioned below is in historical content of a book. There is a big dif
|
|
by Jeanne
|
Mar 21, 2008 9:57 AM
|
|
When I read literature, whether it is a classic, such as The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn or Cross Creek, or something set back in time, reading the N-word stings & I'm white, it helps me see how being black & called that word wou
|
|
by chaz
|
Mar 20, 2008 5:55 PM
|
|
As usual, Mr Maxwell is very insightful and articulate in his presentation of a difficult and conflicting topic. Well said!
|
|
by Stina
|
Mar 20, 2008 12:59 PM
|
|
I couldn't agree more. It has to be taken in context. Why is it accepted in music (as an insult) and not in literature (as a story of the past)?
|
|
by Mary Russell
|
Mar 20, 2008 12:57 PM
|
|
Thanks, Bill. Somewhere along the line our educational system has lost the art of teaching life's important lessons through literature. We no longer delve into books and identify with the characters. Sadly, we scan passages for 4 point FCAT answ
|
|
by dsims
|
Mar 20, 2008 12:53 PM
|
|
Thank you for still TEACHING and WRITING. Your article is absolutely the way I felt when I read the article. After all these years why are so many people sensitive to "words" of years gone by. Move on folks.We are all one.Keep telling it l
|
|
by Kay
|
Mar 20, 2008 12:40 PM
|
|
All of this said without actually using the word. It's a shame. As long as it is used in proper context or in the context that the books used it in, it should not be insulting.
|
|
by Joe
|
Mar 20, 2008 12:38 PM
|
|
Unfortunately, the last sentence sums up the problem. Too many people want to forget or re-write history, dooming us to repeat it, again and again. Sad.
|
|
by Debbie
|
Mar 20, 2008 12:38 PM
|
|
Once again, Bill Maxwell so eloquently wrote about something that's sensitive to so many. I'm so glad he's returned to our area!!
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
|