Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
  • Owning vs. renting
    The end of the real estate boom has led to a community mix that some owner-occupants say they didn't bargain for. See detailed, clickable maps with data for your neighborhood.
  • More multimedia reports
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message

Loony Pastors of all Colors

By E.J. Dionne, Washington Post Columnist
In print: Friday, May 2, 2008


Social Bookmarking [+]
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

NEW YORK

Do white right-wing preachers have it easier than black left-wing preachers? Is there a double standard?

The political explosion around the Rev. Jeremiah Wright was inevitable, given Wright's personal closeness to Barack Obama and the outrageous rubbish the pastor has offered about AIDS, 9/11 and Louis Farrakhan.

After Wright's bizarre and narcissistic performance at the National Press Club on Monday, Obama would have looked weak and irresolute had he not denounced him. But if there was a moment of courage in this drama, it was not Obama's condemnation of Wright but his earlier and now much-criticized effort to avoid a complete break with his unapologetic pastor.

In March, Obama tried to explain the anger in the black community and insisted that "to condemn it without understanding its roots only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races."

In light of this racial gap, it's worth pondering why white, right-wing preachers who make ridiculous and sometimes shameful statements usually emerge with their influence in tact.

The catalogue goes back to Bailey Smith, the former president of the Southern Baptist Convention. Speaking at a 1980 religious convention that was also addressed by Ronald Reagan, Smith declared that "God Almighty does not hear the prayer of a Jew."

Reagan later asserted that he thought Jewish prayers were answered, but was less than definitive: "Everyone can make his own interpretation of the Bible," the Gipper said, "and many individuals have been making differing interpretations for a long time."

Two days after the 9/11 attacks, Jerry Falwell, appearing on Pat Robertson's 700 Club, declared: "I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way — all of them who have tried to secularize America — I point the finger in their face and say, 'You helped this happen.' "

Robertson replied: "Well, I totally concur, and the problem is we have adopted that agenda at the highest levels of our government. And so we're responsible as a free society for what the top people do. And the top people, of course, is the court system."

To their credit, many conservatives condemned Falwell and Robertson. The ministers backed away from their words, but Falwell's retraction was, at best, partial. "When a nation deserts God and expels God from the culture," Falwell insisted, "the result is not good."

What's telling is that neither preacher lost sway in Republican circles. Before Falwell's death last year, John McCain actively courted his support, and Rudy Giuliani, the hero of 9/11, welcomed Robertson's endorsement of his own candidacy. "His advice is invaluable," Giuliani said.

And, of course, there is the endorsement of McCain by the Rev. John Hagee, founder of Cornerstone Church in San Antonio, who has called the Catholic Church "the great whore of Babylon" and "the anti-Christ."

It's entirely true that Wright's foolishness is a bigger deal because of his long-standing relationship with Obama. That's the view of John Danforth, a former Republican senator from Missouri and Episcopal priest who was here for a conference on religion and politics.

But in an interview, Danforth said that for a long time, the role of the religious right in Republican politics "did not get enough attention," partly because so much of its activity occurred out of public view. "The way that it works is to get the people listening to you very angry," he said, "and you kind of whisper in their ears."

The Rev. William Danaher, a professor at the General Theological Seminary here, argued that left-wing preachers who are black draw more fire because their critique of society tends to be more fundamental.

"The left black preacher is challenging the social structures that everyone lives in," Danaher said. "The white preachers on the right don't challenge these structures. Instead, they talk about issues of personal morality and individual behavior."

None of this absolves Wright. Allen Dwight Callahan, one of the nation's leading African-American scripture scholars, argued on the Web site of PBS's Religion and Ethics Newsweekly that "prophets of old didn't announce their prophetic prerogatives at press conferences and press clubs" and that Wright "is wrong to wrap his recent media attention in the mantel of the prophetic tradition."

Exactly right. Now the question is whether we will be just as tough on false prophets who happen to be white and right wing.

E.J. Dionne's e-mail address is
postchat@aol.com.

© Washington Post Writers Group



[Last modified: May 05, 2008 02:54 PM]



Comments on this article
by billy May 5, 2008 2:54 PM
now more than ever, we need the separation of church and state. I have no intention of signing on to evangelicalism, and i resent its influence on my own life.
by Vilmar May 5, 2008 10:19 AM
Hmmm, let me see now.... one or two statements by a white preacher is somehow equal to 20 years of hate-spewing, blame-America-and-whites bile? Yep! Sure! If it's by those who worship at the alter of relativism.
by Cliff May 2, 2008 10:02 PM
This is just a variant of the "we are all guilty" excuse. Conservative preachers get taken to task for their wacko comments. No conservative candidacy would survive the revelation of a 20 year association with a crackpot mentor, nor should
by Jack May 2, 2008 9:59 PM
Yes, what is really ironic about McCain and Hagg is that McCain accepted haggee endorsement in New Orleans, hoping we'd forget that Hagee declared Katrina was God sent the hurricane and killed so many to thwort "homosexual Parade". Wh
by Lisa May 2, 2008 9:59 PM
There is a total double standard in this hoe episode. Omama dragged through coal on this while McCain gets a free ride for his sought after endorsement of Rev Hagee who calls the Catholic church 'the great whore' and much more. Why is that
by geezer May 2, 2008 9:55 PM
I wouldn't hold my breath! McCain actively courted Hagee's endorsement for a year and the Clintons invited Wright to the White House to counsel them during the Lewinsky affair. But of course McCain and Clinton are white so......
by Kay May 2, 2008 2:29 PM
Many of us already are.
by Larry May 2, 2008 2:24 PM
Dionne's defense of Obama by inferring that Republicans are racists is typical. Obama wants to be the President of the US. The fact that a racist, hate-mongering so-called preacher is his long-time mentor, spiritual advisor, and f
by barb May 2, 2008 2:22 PM
Prophets today just might use press conferences and press clubs to speak truth to power -they didn't have such things 2000 yrs ago. Whether Wright is one or not is up for debate but it's silly to attack the means of delivery instead o
by ME May 2, 2008 2:22 PM
I believe the biggest difference is that most republicans buy that crap hook line & sinker, but democrats understand when someone's talking crazy talk. Plus, democrats seem to better get separation of church and state.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT