Friday, June 22, 2018
Opinion

Blumner: Fourth Amendment, MIA

A moment of nostalgia, please, to reflect on the Fourth Amendment.

Once it promised a wall of protection around Americans' privacy. It said quite clearly that law enforcement had to get a warrant from a judge based on probable cause of wrongdoing before snooping on "persons, houses, papers, and effects."

It still says that, but no one acts like it does.

The National Security Agency has been vacuuming up massive amounts of telephone "metadata" on whom we call, when and each call's length. True, the operation was approved by the secret FISA court. But rather than be consistent with the Fourth Amendment, the process recalls the general warrants despised by 18th century Americans and ostensibly eradicated by the amendment's guarantees.

Privacy is under assault by the FBI and dozens of federal agencies that use administrative subpoenas by the thousands, without a judge's approval, to demand all kinds of business records. And police agencies around the country are using license plate recognition systems without warrants to record and store data on everyone driving a car.

These days, the Fourth Amendment doesn't stand for much beyond hoary aspirations.

Law enforcement is not really to blame. It is simply exploiting exclusions to the warrant requirement coupled with supercomputer technology now available. The real culprit is the U.S. Supreme Court, the ultimate guardian of individual rights, whose literalist and hidebound rulings on the Fourth Amendment have allowed for the steady erosion of privacy.

The problem started in the 1970s when the high court adopted a third-party doctrine that contains an inherent conundrum for a society increasingly technologically driven. In the cases United States vs. Miller and Smith vs. Maryland, the court said the government could obtain bank and telephone records, respectively, without implicating the Fourth Amendment. The rationale was that once a person has voluntarily given up information to a third party, the information was exposed to the public and could no longer be expected to be kept private.

There are two distinct elements that make this unworkable. First, it disregards the realities of modern life in which people must trust third parties — medical professionals, financial brokers, Internet service providers, abortion clinics — with an array of private records.

But lower courts are still stuck with the doctrine. Just last month the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that no warrant is necessary when the government seeks location records from a cellphone company that can include a detailed history of someone's whereabouts.

Second, the third-party doctrine can lead to the kind of mass surveillance that turns everyone into a potential suspect. With the Obama administration interpreting the Patriot Act to allow for bulk record collection with no principled limitations, we are at the cusp of a Panopticon society, precisely the kind of watched existence the Fourth Amendment was designed to prevent.

Congress is too spooked by national security fears to be any real help in reining in a surveillance state. Rebuilding the Fourth Amendment is only likely to come from the one branch of government insulated from electoral pressures.

But the Supreme Court has yet to develop a new doctrine despite unease over law enforcement's access to invasive technology. In a 2001 case, the Supreme Court rejected the warrantless use of thermal-imaging devices to detect in-home pot growing operations. In 2012, it told police they couldn't attach a GPS device to a car without a warrant.

The Supreme Court should start by stating the obvious: today's electronic records are the functional equivalent of 18th century papers held in one's desk drawer. Then, as recommended by Jay Stanley of the American Civil Liberties Union in an issue brief on the subject, Fourth Amendment doctrine should be rebuilt to protect "the privacy and dignity befitting a free people."

People voluntarily give up ridiculous amounts of personal information to online retailers and social media outlets. Still, as Stanley aptly notes, "Privacy does not mean keeping secrets. Rather, it means having the power to keep them if you wish." Only a revitalized Fourth Amendment that means what it says can do that.

Comments
Editorial: Handing out gift cards like candy at CareerSource

Editorial: Handing out gift cards like candy at CareerSource

It’s hard to pick the biggest outrage in the financial and ethical swamp that has swallowed Tampa Bay’s two primary job placement agencies, CareerSource Pinellas and CareerSource Tampa Bay. Is it the boiler room atmosphere where CareerSource recruite...
Updated: 8 hours ago

Family separation crisis is not over

The family-separation crisis that President Donald Trump created is not over. The executive order Trump signed Wednesday purporting to end the routine tearing of children from their undocumented parents stands on uncertain legal ground. U.S. border a...
Updated: 10 hours ago
Editorial: State help needed to staff hotlines with veterans helping veterans

Editorial: State help needed to staff hotlines with veterans helping veterans

Veterans can help veterans deal with trauma resulting from military service in a way no one else can. That’s the theory behind a special hotline set up in the Tampa Bay area that proponents are hoping to take statewide.The expansion would cost some $...
Updated: 12 hours ago
Editorial: With Supreme Court ruling, Florida should collect sales tax from online retailers

Editorial: With Supreme Court ruling, Florida should collect sales tax from online retailers

It turns out the U.S. Supreme Court has a better grasp of the economic realities of the 21st century than Congress or the Florida Legislature. The court ruled Thursday that states can require online retailers to collect sales taxes even if the retail...
Published: 06/21/18
Updated: 06/22/18
Editorial: Congress should ban splitting kids, parents

Editorial: Congress should ban splitting kids, parents

The shocking scenes of immigrant children crying after being taken from their parents at the border exposed a new level of cruelty by the Trump administration, and though the president reversed course Wednesday, Congress needs to end the shameful pra...
Published: 06/21/18
Sessions kickstarts action on marijuana

Sessions kickstarts action on marijuana

Good job, Jeff Sessions! It seems the attorney general’s misguided attempts to revive the unpopular and unjust federal war on marijuana may be having the exact opposite effect — prompting a new bipartisan effort in Congress to allow states to legaliz...
Published: 06/18/18
Updated: 06/21/18
Editorial: A court victory for protecting Florida’s environment

Editorial: A court victory for protecting Florida’s environment

A Tallahassee judge has affirmed the overwhelming intent of Florida voters by ruling that state lawmakers have failed to comply with a constitutional amendment that is supposed to provide a specific pot of money to buy and preserve endangered lands. ...
Published: 06/18/18
Updated: 06/20/18
Editorial: Trump should stop taking children away from parents at the border

Editorial: Trump should stop taking children away from parents at the border

Innocent children should not be used as political pawns. That is exactly what the Trump administration is doing by cruelly prying young children away from their parents as these desperate families cross the Mexican border in search of a safer, better...
Published: 06/17/18
Updated: 06/19/18

Editorial: ATF should get tougher on gun dealers who violate the law

Gun dealers who break the law by turning a blind eye to federal licensing rules are as dangerous to society as people who have no right to a possess a firearm in the first place. Yet a recent report shows that the federal agency responsible for polic...
Published: 06/17/18
Updated: 06/18/18
Editorial: Encouraging private citizens to step up on transit

Editorial: Encouraging private citizens to step up on transit

The new grass-roots effort to put a transportation package before Hillsborough County voters in November faces a tough slog. Voters rejected a similar effort in 2010, and another in 2016 by elected officials never made it from the gate. But the lates...
Published: 06/15/18