Monday, February 19, 2018
Opinion

Citizens pushed aside in pier planning

Proponents of the Lens, including St. Petersburg Mayor Bill Foster and most City Council members, claim that the Lens is the result of a process that began in March 2009 with the formation of the Pier Advisory Task Force. The truth is that the process that led to the Lens proposal began July 19, 2011, when the city, having rejected the work of the task force, announced the St. Petersburg Pier International Design Competition.

Two documents plus a time line tell the story. They are: the Pier Advisory Task Force Final Report of June 2010, and the Competition Design Principles — Stage II of September 2011. The 20 citizen members of the task force knew our city, its environment and its character. The task force, through 60-plus meetings with multiple opportunities for public input, accomplished the visioning and programming tasks expected in the development of a municipal facility.

In the words of the task force final report: "The Pier program selected focuses on restaurants and other food service programming. This approach was found to be most successful in pier case studies reviewed and affords waterfront views and gathering spots for the community."

The "program" or "architect's brief" is a short statement of the use for the facility to be constructed and of the users' needs which will dictate its size, if size is not specified.

The task force's final report provided the City Council with three alternative conceptual designs for a new pier, all of which were based on the new pier having as its primary attraction, aside from the on-the-water experience any pier offers, a building to house 26,000 square feet of restaurant and banquet facilities plus 5,000 square feet each for retail and public use. The task force recommended an international design competition to select the architect to flesh out the alternative selected by the council.

The City Council rejected all of the task force's alternatives. It rejected the restaurant-focused program recommended by the task force. It turned the pier design contest into an open-ended process in which famous architects would be invited, in the words of a city engineer, to "tell us what we can do to enhance our waterfront." On Page 1 of the design principles document, the contestants were told that the selected design teams would "help define the brief and envision a solution. Then, once the final design team is selected, the process for obtaining community input to further refine the winning concept can begin."

This statement shows that the city intended to ignore the usual rule of project development that form follows function; the result was the Lens — a project featuring an art object which will consume most of the budget — if it is built.

The city's design principles document told contestants that the task force effort had been "well-intentioned but shortsighted" and that the effort to define what the new pier should be and do "stifled the imagination." The contestants were supplied the task force's final report, but that could only have been for use as a data source as the contestants had been clearly warned off from the substance of the report.

The design principles document identified the five-person contest jury that would include council member Leslie Curran and three architecture and planning professors from San Francisco, Boston and Tampa. The jury would select the architects who would compete in the conceptual design submission phase and would choose the three designs to be submitted to City Council. The public would be permitted to express a preference, but "none of the above" was not offered as an option.

The final step in this six-month process was the City Council vote on Feb. 2 to approve the Lens concept. Our city leaders own every minute and every decision made in the short process that led to the Lens. Their attempt to stand on the broad shoulders of those who preceded them fails.

William Ballard is a retired St. Petersburg construction and banking lawyer.

Comments
Editorial: Trumpís rising deficits and misplaced priorities

Editorial: Trumpís rising deficits and misplaced priorities

Itís not popular in Washington or virtually anywhere else these days to express concern about the rising federal deficit. Congressional Republicans who used to be deficit hawks first voted to cut taxes by $1.5 trillion over the next decade, then rais...
Published: 02/17/18
Editorial: Buckhorn should not appeal verdict in firefighterís case

Editorial: Buckhorn should not appeal verdict in firefighterís case

The city of Tampa should have taken Tanja Vidovic seriously from the start when the Tampa firefighter complained about her treatment in the workplace. Now that a jury and judge have spoken, itís time for City Hall to cut its losses, learn from its mi...
Published: 02/15/18
Updated: 02/16/18
Editorial: CareerSource troubles mount as public trust drops

Editorial: CareerSource troubles mount as public trust drops

The dark cloud enveloping Tampa Bayís job placement centers keeps growing. There are accusations of forged documents, evidence of nepotism and concerns about grossly inflated performance numbers that could be tied to receiving more public money and b...
Published: 02/15/18
Updated: 02/16/18
Editorials: Prayers and platitudes after shootings arenít enough

Editorials: Prayers and platitudes after shootings arenít enough

Even before the victims of another mass shooting at another public school were identified, Gov. Rick Scott, Attorney General Pam Bondi, state legislators and members of Congress rushed to South Florida or to social media to offer their thoughts and p...
Published: 02/15/18
Editorial: DCF review should get to the bottom of Hillsborough foster care issues

Editorial: DCF review should get to the bottom of Hillsborough foster care issues

The Florida Department of Children and Families is right to call for a timely and "comprehensive" review of Hillsborough Countyís foster care system. Though the probe is a reaction to a recent case involving a child who was left unattended, the revie...
Published: 02/14/18

A Washington Post editorial: Modernize 911 calling before it becomes an emergency

This Friday marks the 50th anniversary of the first 911 emergency call placed in the United States. Since then, uncounted lives have been saved and people helped. It has been a great accomplishment of government.But even as an estimated 240 million 9...
Published: 02/13/18
Updated: 02/14/18
Editorial: Scott, Cabinet cannot be trusted on felonsí voting rights

Editorial: Scott, Cabinet cannot be trusted on felonsí voting rights

Gov. Rick Scott always has been grudging and imperious about restoring the voting rights of felons, requiring them to wait for years before begging the governor and Cabinet to be recognized again as citizens. That arrogance is on full display in a le...
Published: 02/13/18
Another voice: ĎDreamersí donít know whom to trust on immigration

Another voice: ĎDreamersí donít know whom to trust on immigration

Immigrants brought into this country illegally as children by their parents may be wondering whom to trust. The political theater being played out in Washington hasnít settled the status of either the "Dreamers" or the estimated 11 million other undo...
Published: 02/13/18
Editorial: Promising Tampa stadium site for Rays

Editorial: Promising Tampa stadium site for Rays

While it came as little surprise, the Tampa Bay Raysí selection of an Ybor City site near Tampaís Channel District as the best spot for a new stadium is an important milestone in the effort to keep Major League Baseball. Now comes the hard work of de...
Published: 02/09/18
Editorial: Senate should reject Houseís attack on public schools

Editorial: Senate should reject Houseís attack on public schools

After pummeling public education so soundly last year, itís little surprise Republican state legislators are mounting another attack on public schools, teachers and local districts. The mammoth education bill passed by the House last week is loaded w...
Published: 02/08/18
Updated: 02/13/18