Clear80° WeatherClear80° Weather

Column: Obama rails against all work and low pay

President Barack Obama’s speech distinguished the free market from the work ethic.

EPA photo

President Barack Obama’s speech distinguished the free market from the work ethic.

The central word in President Barack Obama's State of the Union address wasn't equality or opportunity. It was work.

People will tell you this was a boring speech. Don't believe them. It was a speech with a sharp edge. It distinguished the free market, represented by Republicans, from the work ethic, represented by Democrats. If that's the debate in 2014, Democrats stand a good chance of winning.

Here's the basic idea. Many people who vote Republican don't really believe in the free market. What they believe in is the work ethic. These two things aren't identical.

Sometimes the free market betrays the work ethic. When employees bust their tails, but the CEO gets all the money, people don't like that. They aren't capitalists. They don't want a government that punishes effort or rewards sloth. But they like a government that makes sure the economy rewards work.

The conventional view of Obama, repeated in the official Republican response by Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., is that he "talks a lot about income inequality." But as a description of Obama's speech, that isn't quite right.

Obama used the words equal, equality and inequality just eight times. He used opportunity and opportunities 14 times. He used work, workers, working, workforce and hard-working more than 60 times. Thirty-six of those references were directly about economic labor.

The distinction is important. Most people think income inequality is fine — in fact, it's proper — when one person works harder than another. Obama's argument isn't just that the economy has left incomes unequal. It's that the economy is failing to honor work.

"What I believe unites the people of this nation," he began, "is the simple, profound belief in opportunity for all — the notion that if you work hard and take responsibility, you can get ahead."

Later, he made the equation more explicit: "Our success should depend not on accident of birth, but the strength of our work ethic and the scope of our dreams." But "that belief has suffered some serious blows," he observed. "Corporate profits and stock prices have rarely been higher, and those at the top have never done better. But average wages have barely budged."

Obama discussed various ways in which the government could intervene to help people earn a living: job training, small business loans, trade deals, infrastructure, green jobs, and construction projects. But he crystallized his work ethic message in four proposals.

1. Unemployment insurance. Obama chided Congress for allowing this insurance to lapse for many people.

2. Equal pay for women. It's a complex problem, entangled in technical questions about what counts as equal work. But most people aren't interested in those technicalities. To them, work is work, and unequal pay, on its face, seems unfair.

3. Minimum wage. Here, he made a clear statement of the case for the work ethic over the free market. Yes, we accept some inequality. But we accept it by virtue of effort. By the same token, we don't accept poverty-level wages for people who work. We draw a line against the laws of supply and demand.

4. Earned Income Tax Credit. Obama said, "There are other steps we can take to help families make ends meet, and few are more effective at reducing inequality and helping families pull themselves up through hard work than the Earned Income Tax Credit. ... (But it) doesn't do enough for single workers who don't have kids."

Obama ended on the same note. "The spirit that has always moved this nation forward," is "the recognition that through hard work and responsibility, we can pursue our individual dreams."

Rodgers, in her rebuttal, presented a "Republican vision" that "empowers you, not the government. … It's one that champions free markets and trusts people to make their own decisions, not a government that decides for you. It helps working families rise above the limits of poverty and protects our most vulnerable."

That's the debate ahead. Can the free market be trusted to lift working families out of poverty? If not, should the government step in?

Ultimately, do most Americans believe more in capitalism or in labor? Do they see government as a threat to freedom or as an ally of honest work?

For more than 30 years, Republicans prevailed in that debate because people had lost faith in government. But what happens if they lose faith in the economy? When the free market stops serving the work ethic, look out.

William Saletan is the author of Bearing Right.

© 2014 Slate

Column: Obama rails against all work and low pay 01/29/14 Column: Obama rails against all work and low pay 01/29/14 [Last modified: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 4:12pm]

© 2014 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...

Column: Obama rails against all work and low pay

President Barack Obama’s speech distinguished the free market from the work ethic.

EPA photo

President Barack Obama’s speech distinguished the free market from the work ethic.

The central word in President Barack Obama's State of the Union address wasn't equality or opportunity. It was work.

People will tell you this was a boring speech. Don't believe them. It was a speech with a sharp edge. It distinguished the free market, represented by Republicans, from the work ethic, represented by Democrats. If that's the debate in 2014, Democrats stand a good chance of winning.

Here's the basic idea. Many people who vote Republican don't really believe in the free market. What they believe in is the work ethic. These two things aren't identical.

Sometimes the free market betrays the work ethic. When employees bust their tails, but the CEO gets all the money, people don't like that. They aren't capitalists. They don't want a government that punishes effort or rewards sloth. But they like a government that makes sure the economy rewards work.

The conventional view of Obama, repeated in the official Republican response by Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., is that he "talks a lot about income inequality." But as a description of Obama's speech, that isn't quite right.

Obama used the words equal, equality and inequality just eight times. He used opportunity and opportunities 14 times. He used work, workers, working, workforce and hard-working more than 60 times. Thirty-six of those references were directly about economic labor.

The distinction is important. Most people think income inequality is fine — in fact, it's proper — when one person works harder than another. Obama's argument isn't just that the economy has left incomes unequal. It's that the economy is failing to honor work.

"What I believe unites the people of this nation," he began, "is the simple, profound belief in opportunity for all — the notion that if you work hard and take responsibility, you can get ahead."

Later, he made the equation more explicit: "Our success should depend not on accident of birth, but the strength of our work ethic and the scope of our dreams." But "that belief has suffered some serious blows," he observed. "Corporate profits and stock prices have rarely been higher, and those at the top have never done better. But average wages have barely budged."

Obama discussed various ways in which the government could intervene to help people earn a living: job training, small business loans, trade deals, infrastructure, green jobs, and construction projects. But he crystallized his work ethic message in four proposals.

1. Unemployment insurance. Obama chided Congress for allowing this insurance to lapse for many people.

2. Equal pay for women. It's a complex problem, entangled in technical questions about what counts as equal work. But most people aren't interested in those technicalities. To them, work is work, and unequal pay, on its face, seems unfair.

3. Minimum wage. Here, he made a clear statement of the case for the work ethic over the free market. Yes, we accept some inequality. But we accept it by virtue of effort. By the same token, we don't accept poverty-level wages for people who work. We draw a line against the laws of supply and demand.

4. Earned Income Tax Credit. Obama said, "There are other steps we can take to help families make ends meet, and few are more effective at reducing inequality and helping families pull themselves up through hard work than the Earned Income Tax Credit. ... (But it) doesn't do enough for single workers who don't have kids."

Obama ended on the same note. "The spirit that has always moved this nation forward," is "the recognition that through hard work and responsibility, we can pursue our individual dreams."

Rodgers, in her rebuttal, presented a "Republican vision" that "empowers you, not the government. … It's one that champions free markets and trusts people to make their own decisions, not a government that decides for you. It helps working families rise above the limits of poverty and protects our most vulnerable."

That's the debate ahead. Can the free market be trusted to lift working families out of poverty? If not, should the government step in?

Ultimately, do most Americans believe more in capitalism or in labor? Do they see government as a threat to freedom or as an ally of honest work?

For more than 30 years, Republicans prevailed in that debate because people had lost faith in government. But what happens if they lose faith in the economy? When the free market stops serving the work ethic, look out.

William Saletan is the author of Bearing Right.

© 2014 Slate

Column: Obama rails against all work and low pay 01/29/14 Column: Obama rails against all work and low pay 01/29/14 [Last modified: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 4:12pm]

© 2014 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...