Thursday, January 18, 2018

Column: Obama rails against all work and low pay

The central word in President Barack Obama's State of the Union address wasn't equality or opportunity. It was work.

People will tell you this was a boring speech. Don't believe them. It was a speech with a sharp edge. It distinguished the free market, represented by Republicans, from the work ethic, represented by Democrats. If that's the debate in 2014, Democrats stand a good chance of winning.

Here's the basic idea. Many people who vote Republican don't really believe in the free market. What they believe in is the work ethic. These two things aren't identical.

Sometimes the free market betrays the work ethic. When employees bust their tails, but the CEO gets all the money, people don't like that. They aren't capitalists. They don't want a government that punishes effort or rewards sloth. But they like a government that makes sure the economy rewards work.

The conventional view of Obama, repeated in the official Republican response by Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., is that he "talks a lot about income inequality." But as a description of Obama's speech, that isn't quite right.

Obama used the words equal, equality and inequality just eight times. He used opportunity and opportunities 14 times. He used work, workers, working, workforce and hard-working more than 60 times. Thirty-six of those references were directly about economic labor.

The distinction is important. Most people think income inequality is fine — in fact, it's proper — when one person works harder than another. Obama's argument isn't just that the economy has left incomes unequal. It's that the economy is failing to honor work.

"What I believe unites the people of this nation," he began, "is the simple, profound belief in opportunity for all — the notion that if you work hard and take responsibility, you can get ahead."

Later, he made the equation more explicit: "Our success should depend not on accident of birth, but the strength of our work ethic and the scope of our dreams." But "that belief has suffered some serious blows," he observed. "Corporate profits and stock prices have rarely been higher, and those at the top have never done better. But average wages have barely budged."

Obama discussed various ways in which the government could intervene to help people earn a living: job training, small business loans, trade deals, infrastructure, green jobs, and construction projects. But he crystallized his work ethic message in four proposals.

1. Unemployment insurance. Obama chided Congress for allowing this insurance to lapse for many people.

2. Equal pay for women. It's a complex problem, entangled in technical questions about what counts as equal work. But most people aren't interested in those technicalities. To them, work is work, and unequal pay, on its face, seems unfair.

3. Minimum wage. Here, he made a clear statement of the case for the work ethic over the free market. Yes, we accept some inequality. But we accept it by virtue of effort. By the same token, we don't accept poverty-level wages for people who work. We draw a line against the laws of supply and demand.

4. Earned Income Tax Credit. Obama said, "There are other steps we can take to help families make ends meet, and few are more effective at reducing inequality and helping families pull themselves up through hard work than the Earned Income Tax Credit. ... (But it) doesn't do enough for single workers who don't have kids."

Obama ended on the same note. "The spirit that has always moved this nation forward," is "the recognition that through hard work and responsibility, we can pursue our individual dreams."

Rodgers, in her rebuttal, presented a "Republican vision" that "empowers you, not the government. … It's one that champions free markets and trusts people to make their own decisions, not a government that decides for you. It helps working families rise above the limits of poverty and protects our most vulnerable."

That's the debate ahead. Can the free market be trusted to lift working families out of poverty? If not, should the government step in?

Ultimately, do most Americans believe more in capitalism or in labor? Do they see government as a threat to freedom or as an ally of honest work?

For more than 30 years, Republicans prevailed in that debate because people had lost faith in government. But what happens if they lose faith in the economy? When the free market stops serving the work ethic, look out.

William Saletan is the author of Bearing Right.

© 2014 Slate


Another voice: Self-dealing by nursing home owners threatens patient care

The outsourcing of logistical support services, which became commonplace in the U.S. military in the 1990s and later was adopted by state prison systems, has now come to dominate the nursing home industry. And while nursing homes, unlike the military...
Published: 01/17/18
Editorial: Making illegal sewage discharges legal is wrong answer

Editorial: Making illegal sewage discharges legal is wrong answer

Three years into a crisis with its sewer system, St. Petersburg has a dandy new idea for dealing with the environmental fallout of dumping dirty water into the aquifer. Instead of committing to banning the outlawed practice, a consultant suggested th...
Published: 01/16/18
Updated: 01/17/18
Editorial: Tighten substitute teacher rules in Hillsborough

Editorial: Tighten substitute teacher rules in Hillsborough

A substitute teacher at a Plant City elementary school berated a class of fourth graders — and then the school principal. Another compared a student to a stripper. Others were caught napping, hitting children, making sexual remarks, giving students b...
Published: 01/16/18
Updated: 01/17/18
Editorial: Balancing the playing field for workers’ compensation

Editorial: Balancing the playing field for workers’ compensation

For the longest time, injured workers in Florida were basically at the mercy of the whims of employers to treat them fairly. A 2003 law aimed at reducing the cost of workers’ compensation coverage for businesses had the desired impact, but it also di...
Published: 01/16/18

Another voice: Why just Florida?

Cynicism has always been a part of politics, but rarely are politicians so brazen and self-serving as President Donald Trump and his interior secretary, Ryan Zinke, have been over the past week. First they announced a new offshore drilling plan that ...
Published: 01/16/18
Editorial: King’s legacy still relevant in digital age

Editorial: King’s legacy still relevant in digital age

Today’s holiday honoring the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. couldn’t be more timely. At a moment when the nation’s civic dialogue is choking on personal and political division, it is hard to remember an earlier time when role models were role m...
Published: 01/15/18

Another voice: 38 minutes of fear in Hawaii

In 1938, Orson Welles panicked the nation with a false alarm about a Martian invasion in the radio broadcast The War of the Worlds. That was farfetched, of course. But what happened on Saturday, sadly, was not so hard to imagine — or believe.Authorit...
Published: 01/14/18
Updated: 01/16/18
Editorial: Florida’s chance to make it easier to restore civil rights

Editorial: Florida’s chance to make it easier to restore civil rights

As it has for decades, Florida stubbornly clings to an inhumane, inefficient and indefensible system of justice that permanently sentences more than 1.5 million residents to second-class citizenship. This state automatically revokes the right to vote...
Published: 01/13/18
Editorial: Speak out against Trump’s vulgar remarks

Editorial: Speak out against Trump’s vulgar remarks

President Donald Trump’s vulgar outbursts during a White House meeting on immigration are racist and indefensible no matter how he parses them. They are not presidential, they undermine U.S. foreign relations and they do not reflect America’s values....
Published: 01/12/18

Editorial: Pinellas commission stands up for accountability

The Pinellas County Commission has gotten the message that it should not be a rubber stamp. Commissioners sent a clear signal this week they will demand more accountability of local agencies by refusing to approve nominees for the board for CareerSou...
Published: 01/11/18
Updated: 01/12/18