Friday, November 17, 2017
Opinion

Column: On Social Security, no disaster in sight

RECOMMENDED READING


The Social Security System had no role in contributing to the national debt, and yet negotiators seeking to address the nation's fiscal problems always seem to want to cut Social Security benefits. Even President Barack Obama dangles cuts in benefits to entice Republicans to the deficit-reduction bargaining table. • Social Security is lumped in with deficit reduction because of the frequently heard falsehood that the system will impose undue burdens on future workers. • The trustees of the Social Security Administration report that currently there are 2.8 workers for each retiree, and that this ratio will fall to 2.0 workers over the next 25 years, an alarming and seemingly impossible burden for our children and grandchildren to bear. Critics of the system allege that future workers will be enslaved because of their obligation to pay retiree benefits. Such claims, however, are quite unfounded because they fail to account for the rising productivity of those future workers.

Impact of Improved Worker Productivity.

The United States has a history of investing in the abilities of its work force and the assets they have to work with. As a result, worker productivity has been increasing at a rate of 1.5 percent annually. Economist Dean Baker offers the following arithmetic example to show how important it is to adjust for productivity:

Assuming a retiree consumes about 85 percent of the amount a typical worker consumes, today's 2.8 workers must produce enough for 3.65 people. They get to keep 78 percent of their work product (2.8/3.65 = 78 percent), with the rest going to retirees. Based on the projections in the trustee report, workers 25 years from now will get to keep only 70 percent of their production; but if productivity continues to grow at present rates, they will be 45 percent more productive than today's workers. Under this scenario, future workers will receive much larger aftertax incomes.

Of course, sustained productivity growth requires sustained investment in the assets that contribute to worker productivity. If investment slows, the burden on future workers will be increased: The falling ratio of worker to retiree will not be offset by rising productivity. Continued political resistance to spending, both to invest in economic recovery and especially to invest in productivity-enhancing infrastructure investments, is a good way to assure that future workers will indeed be enslaved, not by Social Security but by lowered economic growth.

A Proposal to Link Social Security More Closely to Productivity.

One mistaken plan to cut Social Security benefits currently under consideration is to reduce the adjustment for inflation. The so-called "chain-weighted" CPI provides a smaller inflation adjuster than the conventional CPI. Consequently, replacing the CPI with the chain price index will substantially lessen future benefits, for example, by 9 percent after 30 years. Unlike other proposals to reduce Social Security benefits, those currently over the age of 55 are not exempted. While the Bureau of Labor Statistics does not yet have a definitive study of the impact of inflation on the elderly, they did conduct a preliminary study in the 1990s and found that an accurate index would have to rise faster, not slower, than the conventional CPI.

In addition to the inaccuracy of the chained CPI, there is another vitally important point: The designers of Social Security linked an individual's benefits to lifetime wages as a proxy for lifetime productivity. They reasoned that workers contribute to the economy through their productivity and that their Social Security benefits should reflect that contribution. For decades, wages kept up with productivity growth, and so this proxy formula functioned as intended. However, as early as 1975, this close link began to diverge, with productivity rising significantly above wages. The continued use of the wage index has resulted in retirement benefits lower than originally intended; and, if benefits are to reflect original intentions, a productivity index should be substituted for the wage index.

To sum up: The chained CPI undercompensates the elderly for inflation while the wage index undercompensates them for lifetime productivity. Of course, in today's budget climate a proposal to raise Social Security benefits to reflect lifetime productivity is a non-starter; but a further cut in benefits through the use of the chained CPI should also be viewed as a nonstarter and taken off the negotiators' table.

Comments

Editorial: Good for Tampa council member Frank Reddick to appeal for community help to solve Seminole Heights killings

As the sole black member of the Tampa City Council, Frank Reddick was moved Thursday to make a special appeal for help in solving four recent murders in the racially mixed neighborhood of Southeast Seminole Heights. "I’m pleading to my brothers. You ...
Updated: 4 hours ago
Editorial: It’s time to renew community’s commitment to Tampa Theatre

Editorial: It’s time to renew community’s commitment to Tampa Theatre

New attention to downtown Tampa as a place to live, work and play is transforming the area at a dizzying pace. Credit goes to recent projects, both public and private, such as the Tampa River Walk, new residential towers, a University of South Florid...
Updated: 8 hours ago
Editorial: Rays opening offer on stadium sounds too low

Editorial: Rays opening offer on stadium sounds too low

The Rays definitely like Ybor City, and Ybor City seems to like the Rays. So what could possibly come between this match made in baseball stadium heaven? Hundreds (and hundreds and hundreds) of millions of dollars. Rays owner Stu Sternberg told Times...
Updated: 4 hours ago
Editorial: Wage hike for contractors’ labor misguided

Editorial: Wage hike for contractors’ labor misguided

St. Petersburg City Council members are poised to raise the minimum wage for contractors who do business with the city, a well-intended but misguided ordinance that should be reconsidered. The hourly minimum wage undoubtedly needs to rise — for every...
Published: 11/16/17

Editorial: Make workplaces welcoming, not just free of harassment

A federal trial began last week in the sex discrimination case that a former firefighter lodged against the city of Tampa. Tanja Vidovic describes a locker-room culture at Tampa Fire Rescue that created a two-tier system — one for men, another for wo...
Updated: 3 hours ago
Editorial: Firing a critic of his handling of the sewer crisis is a bad early step in Kriseman’s new term

Editorial: Firing a critic of his handling of the sewer crisis is a bad early step in Kriseman’s new term

Barely a week after St. Petersburg Mayor Rick Kriseman promised to unite the city following a bitter and divisive campaign, his administration has fired an employee who dared to criticize him. It seems Kriseman’s own mantra of "moving St. Pete forwar...
Published: 11/15/17
Updated: 11/16/17
Editorial: USF’s billion-dollar moment

Editorial: USF’s billion-dollar moment

The University of South Florida recently surpassed its $1 billion fundraising goal, continuing a current trend of exceeding expectations. At 61 years old — barely middle age among higher education institutions — USF has grown up quickly. It now boast...
Updated: 4 hours ago
Editorial: Vets should not have to wait years for benefits

Editorial: Vets should not have to wait years for benefits

American military members hurt in service to their country should not have to wait a lifetime for the benefits they deserve. But that’s a reality of the disability process at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, which hasn’t made payi...
Published: 11/14/17

Editorial: Deputies’ rescue reflects best in law enforcement

The bravery two Hillsborough County sheriff’s deputies showed a week ago is a credit to them and reflects the professionalism of the office.Deputies Benjamin Thompson and Trent Migues responded at dusk Nov. 11 after 82-year-old Leona Evans of Webster...
Updated: 4 hours ago

Another voice: An untrustworthy deal with Russia

President Donald Trump’s latest defense of Russian leader Vladimir Putin included — along with a bow to his denials of meddling in the U.S. election — an appeal to pragmatism. "Having a good relationship with Russia is a good thing, not a bad thing,"...
Published: 11/13/17
Updated: 11/14/17