Friday, May 25, 2018
Opinion

Column: Redefining the limits of privacy

Edward Snowden told the Guardian that he leaked details of National Security Agency surveillance because he doesn't "want to live in a world where there's no privacy."

Oddly enough, he also has posted the following tidbits on the Internet: his employer, the type of gun he owns, his photograph — and the fact that he and his girlfriend "have sex marathons from sundown til sunrise." Snowden used a pseudonym, but it was transparent, given the personal information he disclosed.

In our culture, both digital exhibitionism and digital don't-tread-on-me-ism are on the rise. Privacy law may be about to get more complex than it already is.

The Supreme Court defines Fourth Amendment protections in terms of a "reasonable expectation of privacy."

If you do, say, write or possess something in circumstances suggesting that you expect it to be private, and if society in general would share your expectation, then it's protected. Government can't intrude without a warrant.

It's far from a perfect rule. As Jay Stanley of the American Civil Liberties Union aptly notes, "It bases law and practice on the subject's understanding of law and practice." But the rule kinda, sorta works — assuming courts update "reasonable expectations" in keeping with cultural and technological change.

Alas, cultural and technological change are moving too fast for the doctrine. Consensus about propriety — about what "ladies" and "gentlemen" do and don't discuss in public — is long gone. And because of technology, "public" is practically everywhere, all the time.

The Supreme Court wrestled with this problem in U.S. vs. Jones, decided a year before Snowden's emergence. Police stuck a GPS tracking device to the undercarriage of a drug suspect's car to help build a case against him. All nine justices agreed that the police should have gotten a warrant, but only because attaching the GPS tracker amounted to a "physical intrusion" of the car.

On the big question — whether sustained technological surveillance, conducted without physical intrusion, would have violated today's reasonable expectations of privacy — the court produced no majority opinion.

In a concurring opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor anticipated Snowden, voicing alarm that individuals' movements might be "recorded and aggregated in a manner that enables the government to ascertain, more or less at will, their political and religious beliefs, sexual habits, and so on."

So what if you traveled where the government could have tracked you by conventional means? For Sotomayor, that doesn't create a "reasonable expectation" of data-mining. She would revisit the "reasonable expectations" doctrine, especially the part that supposes you have no privacy interest in information — like your car's path on public roads or telephone "metadata" — disclosed to third parties.

Civil libertarians celebrated Sotomayor's opinion, sensing a pro-privacy backlash at the Supreme Court — but I doubt it.

Yes, there's a difference between things we voluntarily publicize — like Snowden's pseudonymous musings about sex — and the digital bread crumbs we involuntarily leave for government and corporations to gather.

Still, Sotomayor seemed to take that point a bit too far. Quoting a lower court judge, Sotomayor alluded to "indisputably private … trips to the psychiatrist, the plastic surgeon, the abortion clinic, the AIDS treatment center, the strip club, the criminal defense attorney, the by-the-hour motel, the union meeting, the mosque, synagogue or church, the gay bar and on and on." While all of these examples are potentially controversial, none is "indisputably" private by today's standards; church strikes me as usually pretty public, actually.

In another concurring opinion, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. doubted the constitutionality of lengthy warrantless GPS surveillance but noted realistically, "New technology may provide increased convenience or security at the expense of privacy, and many people may find the trade-off worthwhile. And even if the public does not welcome the diminution of privacy that new technology entails, they may eventually reconcile themselves to this development as inevitable."

Alito suggested that legislatures, not courts, should take the lead in defining privacy law, since they are better "situated to gauge changing public attitudes, to draw detailed lines, and to balance privacy and public safety in a comprehensive way."

Still, the only thing less workable than the "reasonable expectations" doctrine might be constant political attempts to account for what every individual might feel like broadcasting, or accept as "inevitable."

In 1929, Secretary of State Henry L. Stimson closed the State Department office that intercepted and decoded foreign diplomatic letters, explaining that "gentlemen do not read other gentlemen's mail."

We need rules for a generation that reads Stimson's words and wonders: What's a gentleman? And what's mail?

© 2013 Washington Post

Comments

NFL kneels before the altar of profits

The owners of the 32 National Football League teams sent a wrongheaded and, frankly, un-American message to their players Wednesday: Expressing your opinion during the national anthem is no longer permitted."A club will be fined by the League if its ...
Published: 05/24/18
Editorial: Trump right to cancel North Korea talks on nuclear weapons

Editorial: Trump right to cancel North Korea talks on nuclear weapons

Regardless of the reason, the cancellation of the U.S.-North Korea summit to address Pyonyang’s nuclear program is hardly the worst possible outcome of this high-stakes diplomatic gamble. President Donald Trump was unprepared, North Korea’s Kim Jong ...
Published: 05/24/18
Editorial: Banks still need watching after easing Dodd-Frank rules

Editorial: Banks still need watching after easing Dodd-Frank rules

Legislation that waters down the 2010 Dodd-Frank law and was sent to President Donald Trump this week is a mixed bag at best. Some provisions recognize that Congress may have gone too far in some areas in the wake of the Great Recession to place new ...
Published: 05/23/18
Updated: 05/24/18

Another voice: The chutzpah of these men

A new phase of the #MeToo movement may be upon us. Call it the "not so fast" era: Powerful men who plotted career comebacks mere months after being taken down by accusations of sexual misconduct now face even more alarming claims.Mario Batali, the ce...
Published: 05/22/18
Updated: 05/23/18
Editorial: Candor key step to restoring trust at Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute

Editorial: Candor key step to restoring trust at Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute

Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital has begun the important work of rebuilding trust with its patients and the community following revelations of medical errors and other problems at its Heart Institute. CEO Dr. Jonathan Ellen candidly acknowledges...
Published: 05/22/18
Updated: 05/23/18
Editorial: Tampa Bay House members fail to stand up to Big Sugar

Editorial: Tampa Bay House members fail to stand up to Big Sugar

Big Sugar remains king in Florida. Just three of the state’s 27 House members voted for an amendment to the farm bill late Thursday that would have started unwinding the needless government supports for sugar that gouge taxpayers. Predictably, the am...
Published: 05/18/18
Editorial: Bondi holds drug industry accountable for Florida opioid crisis

Editorial: Bondi holds drug industry accountable for Florida opioid crisis

Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi’s lawsuit against the nation’s largest drug makers and distributors marks a moment of awakening in the state’s battle to recover from the opioid crisis. In blunt, forceful language, Bondi accuses these companies of ...
Published: 05/18/18
Editorial: A sweet note for the Florida Orchestra’s violin program for at-risk kids

Editorial: A sweet note for the Florida Orchestra’s violin program for at-risk kids

This is music to the ears. Members of the Florida Orchestra will introduce at-risk students to the violin this summer at some Hillsborough recreation centers. For free.An $80,000 grant to the University Area Community Development Corp. will pay for s...
Published: 05/17/18
Updated: 05/18/18
Trump backs off China tariff threat as China pumps money into a Trump family project

Trump backs off China tariff threat as China pumps money into a Trump family project

In barely six weeks, President Donald Trump has gone from threatening to impose $150 billion in tariffs on Chinese goods to extending a lifeline to ZTE, a Chinese cell phone company that violated U.S. sanctions by doing business with Iran and North K...
Published: 05/17/18
Editorial: Activism as seniors helps put Hillsborough graduates on the right path

Editorial: Activism as seniors helps put Hillsborough graduates on the right path

Lots of teenagers are walking together this week in Hillsborough County, a practice they’ve grown accustomed to during this remarkable school year.We can only hope they keep walking for the rest of their lives.Tens of thousands of them this week are ...
Published: 05/17/18