Tuesday, January 16, 2018
Opinion

Column: Redefining the limits of privacy

Edward Snowden told the Guardian that he leaked details of National Security Agency surveillance because he doesn't "want to live in a world where there's no privacy."

Oddly enough, he also has posted the following tidbits on the Internet: his employer, the type of gun he owns, his photograph — and the fact that he and his girlfriend "have sex marathons from sundown til sunrise." Snowden used a pseudonym, but it was transparent, given the personal information he disclosed.

In our culture, both digital exhibitionism and digital don't-tread-on-me-ism are on the rise. Privacy law may be about to get more complex than it already is.

The Supreme Court defines Fourth Amendment protections in terms of a "reasonable expectation of privacy."

If you do, say, write or possess something in circumstances suggesting that you expect it to be private, and if society in general would share your expectation, then it's protected. Government can't intrude without a warrant.

It's far from a perfect rule. As Jay Stanley of the American Civil Liberties Union aptly notes, "It bases law and practice on the subject's understanding of law and practice." But the rule kinda, sorta works — assuming courts update "reasonable expectations" in keeping with cultural and technological change.

Alas, cultural and technological change are moving too fast for the doctrine. Consensus about propriety — about what "ladies" and "gentlemen" do and don't discuss in public — is long gone. And because of technology, "public" is practically everywhere, all the time.

The Supreme Court wrestled with this problem in U.S. vs. Jones, decided a year before Snowden's emergence. Police stuck a GPS tracking device to the undercarriage of a drug suspect's car to help build a case against him. All nine justices agreed that the police should have gotten a warrant, but only because attaching the GPS tracker amounted to a "physical intrusion" of the car.

On the big question — whether sustained technological surveillance, conducted without physical intrusion, would have violated today's reasonable expectations of privacy — the court produced no majority opinion.

In a concurring opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor anticipated Snowden, voicing alarm that individuals' movements might be "recorded and aggregated in a manner that enables the government to ascertain, more or less at will, their political and religious beliefs, sexual habits, and so on."

So what if you traveled where the government could have tracked you by conventional means? For Sotomayor, that doesn't create a "reasonable expectation" of data-mining. She would revisit the "reasonable expectations" doctrine, especially the part that supposes you have no privacy interest in information — like your car's path on public roads or telephone "metadata" — disclosed to third parties.

Civil libertarians celebrated Sotomayor's opinion, sensing a pro-privacy backlash at the Supreme Court — but I doubt it.

Yes, there's a difference between things we voluntarily publicize — like Snowden's pseudonymous musings about sex — and the digital bread crumbs we involuntarily leave for government and corporations to gather.

Still, Sotomayor seemed to take that point a bit too far. Quoting a lower court judge, Sotomayor alluded to "indisputably private … trips to the psychiatrist, the plastic surgeon, the abortion clinic, the AIDS treatment center, the strip club, the criminal defense attorney, the by-the-hour motel, the union meeting, the mosque, synagogue or church, the gay bar and on and on." While all of these examples are potentially controversial, none is "indisputably" private by today's standards; church strikes me as usually pretty public, actually.

In another concurring opinion, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. doubted the constitutionality of lengthy warrantless GPS surveillance but noted realistically, "New technology may provide increased convenience or security at the expense of privacy, and many people may find the trade-off worthwhile. And even if the public does not welcome the diminution of privacy that new technology entails, they may eventually reconcile themselves to this development as inevitable."

Alito suggested that legislatures, not courts, should take the lead in defining privacy law, since they are better "situated to gauge changing public attitudes, to draw detailed lines, and to balance privacy and public safety in a comprehensive way."

Still, the only thing less workable than the "reasonable expectations" doctrine might be constant political attempts to account for what every individual might feel like broadcasting, or accept as "inevitable."

In 1929, Secretary of State Henry L. Stimson closed the State Department office that intercepted and decoded foreign diplomatic letters, explaining that "gentlemen do not read other gentlemen's mail."

We need rules for a generation that reads Stimson's words and wonders: What's a gentleman? And what's mail?

© 2013 Washington Post

Comments
Editorial: Tighten substitute teacher rules in Hillsborough

Editorial: Tighten substitute teacher rules in Hillsborough

A substitute teacher at a Plant City elementary school berated a class of fourth graders — and then the school principal. Another compared a student to a stripper. Others were caught napping, hitting children, making sexual remarks, giving students b...
Updated: 6 hours ago
Editorial: Balancing the playing field for workers’ compensation

Editorial: Balancing the playing field for workers’ compensation

For the longest time, injured workers in Florida were basically at the mercy of the whims of employers to treat them fairly. A 2003 law aimed at reducing the cost of workers’ compensation coverage for businesses had the desired impact, but it also di...
Published: 01/16/18

Another voice: Why just Florida?

Cynicism has always been a part of politics, but rarely are politicians so brazen and self-serving as President Donald Trump and his interior secretary, Ryan Zinke, have been over the past week. First they announced a new offshore drilling plan that ...
Published: 01/16/18
Editorial: King’s legacy still relevant in digital age

Editorial: King’s legacy still relevant in digital age

Today’s holiday honoring the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. couldn’t be more timely. At a moment when the nation’s civic dialogue is choking on personal and political division, it is hard to remember an earlier time when role models were role m...
Published: 01/15/18

Another voice: 38 minutes of fear in Hawaii

In 1938, Orson Welles panicked the nation with a false alarm about a Martian invasion in the radio broadcast The War of the Worlds. That was farfetched, of course. But what happened on Saturday, sadly, was not so hard to imagine — or believe.Authorit...
Updated: 7 hours ago
Editorial: Florida’s chance to make it easier to restore civil rights

Editorial: Florida’s chance to make it easier to restore civil rights

As it has for decades, Florida stubbornly clings to an inhumane, inefficient and indefensible system of justice that permanently sentences more than 1.5 million residents to second-class citizenship. This state automatically revokes the right to vote...
Published: 01/13/18
Editorial: Speak out against Trump’s vulgar remarks

Editorial: Speak out against Trump’s vulgar remarks

President Donald Trump’s vulgar outbursts during a White House meeting on immigration are racist and indefensible no matter how he parses them. They are not presidential, they undermine U.S. foreign relations and they do not reflect America’s values....
Published: 01/12/18

Editorial: Pinellas commission stands up for accountability

The Pinellas County Commission has gotten the message that it should not be a rubber stamp. Commissioners sent a clear signal this week they will demand more accountability of local agencies by refusing to approve nominees for the board for CareerSou...
Published: 01/11/18
Updated: 01/12/18

Editorial: Progress on Tampa Bay graduation rates

Tampa Bay’s four school districts all reached a significant milestone last school year: achieving graduation rates over 80 percent. It’s believed to be the first time Pinellas, Hillsborough, Pasco and Hernando counties all surpassed that threshold, a...
Published: 01/11/18
Updated: 01/12/18

Take deal; build wall

President Donald Trump says he is optimistic a deal can be struck to shield "Dreamers," the young undocumented immigrants whose lives he put in jeopardy by stripping them of work permits and deportation protection, beginning March 5. His price, and t...
Published: 01/10/18
Updated: 01/11/18