Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Opinion

On climate, we're all in this together

A group of leaders inside the U.S. Capitol is intent on pulling us apart just when we need to pull together to face the threat of climate change.

The latest evidence of this was Tuesday's vote on the $51 billion Superstorm Sandy relief bill. One hundred seventy-nine House Republicans opposed the measure to provide rebuilding and other aid to storm-damaged communities, including every Republican from our region except Rep. C.W. Bill Young of Indian Shores. Overall only 49 Republicans were in support. In contrast, only one Democrat, a blue dog from Tennessee, voted "no."

Anyone remember the 1975 New York Daily News headline "Ford to City: Drop Dead"? This was redux.

The lawmakers who stood with storm victims also are generally those who accept climate science and are open to adopting strategies to combat climate change and its effects. The lawmakers opposed to the aid are generally deniers of manmade climate change who care more about protecting guns than the environment. This group of largely of red-state Republicans has demonstrated towering ignorance and indifference to the climate challenges ahead.

They may claim that their "no" votes were cast in the name of deficit frugality, but they are really signs of uninterest in helping a largely Democratic region cope with the effects of climate change. Some of the funding in the aid package (though not nearly enough) is going toward projects like flood control systems that strengthen defenses against already extreme weather that is predicted to intensify. The message from the bill's opponents is clear: "We don't have your back."

You would think there would be a little more gratitude by red staters. Eight of the 10 states that receive the most federal money relative to what they send to Washington are red states, according to the Tax Foundation. The blue states of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, where much of the Sandy aid is going, are among those receiving the least federal funding compared to what they contribute.

In recent years Republicans have made an irresponsible shift away from accepting climate science. In 2008, the Republican Party platform actually called for "market-based solutions that will decrease emissions" to address effects on climate. But within four years that concern vanished. The party's 2012 platform was openly hostile to government efforts to reduce climate change. It demanded that Congress prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gases, flatly opposed "cap and trade" and raised sidelong doubts about the science of climate change, calling the cause of weather events "uncertain."

It is worth noting that 86 Republicans who voted "no" on Sandy relief were also part of the bloc opposed to a 2009 cap-and-trade bill to limit greenhouse gases. The bill passed the then-Democrat-controlled House but was shelved before reaching a vote in the Senate.

As evidence of the effect of climate change mounts, red state Republicans have become less convinced of its existence and are less willing to do anything about it. But their determined blindness will be short-lived. The American public is beginning to realize what is behind Sandy and some of the other 25 U.S. natural disasters over the last two years that have each caused at least $1 billion in damage. Complaining that climate scientists are liberal shills with wild-eyed predictions about rising seas doesn't work when your audience is wearing hip boots.

Recently climate change communication expert Anthony Leiserowitz, appearing on the PBS show Moyers & Company, compared a small rise in the earth's temperature to that in a human body. It only takes a rise of 4 or 5 degrees Fahrenheit in internal body temperature for organ systems to start shutting down, and the earth's climate is headed for a similar increase. The just-released U.S. Climate Assessment warns of an inconceivable 9 to 15 degree rise in temperature throughout most of America in this century, if current emission levels remain the same.

This is a national emergency, and the 179 Republicans and one Democrat who rejected Superstorm Sandy aid are MIA. They don't seem to understand or care that all our fates are inextricably linked.

Comments

Another voice: Self-dealing by nursing home owners threatens patient care

The outsourcing of logistical support services, which became commonplace in the U.S. military in the 1990s and later was adopted by state prison systems, has now come to dominate the nursing home industry. And while nursing homes, unlike the military...
Updated: 8 hours ago
Editorial: Making illegal sewage discharges legal is wrong answer

Editorial: Making illegal sewage discharges legal is wrong answer

Three years into a crisis with its sewer system, St. Petersburg has a dandy new idea for dealing with the environmental fallout of dumping dirty water into the aquifer. Instead of committing to banning the outlawed practice, a consultant suggested th...
Updated: 7 hours ago
Editorial: Tighten substitute teacher rules in Hillsborough

Editorial: Tighten substitute teacher rules in Hillsborough

A substitute teacher at a Plant City elementary school berated a class of fourth graders — and then the school principal. Another compared a student to a stripper. Others were caught napping, hitting children, making sexual remarks, giving students b...
Updated: 9 hours ago
Editorial: Balancing the playing field for workers’ compensation

Editorial: Balancing the playing field for workers’ compensation

For the longest time, injured workers in Florida were basically at the mercy of the whims of employers to treat them fairly. A 2003 law aimed at reducing the cost of workers’ compensation coverage for businesses had the desired impact, but it also di...
Published: 01/16/18

Another voice: Why just Florida?

Cynicism has always been a part of politics, but rarely are politicians so brazen and self-serving as President Donald Trump and his interior secretary, Ryan Zinke, have been over the past week. First they announced a new offshore drilling plan that ...
Published: 01/16/18
Editorial: King’s legacy still relevant in digital age

Editorial: King’s legacy still relevant in digital age

Today’s holiday honoring the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. couldn’t be more timely. At a moment when the nation’s civic dialogue is choking on personal and political division, it is hard to remember an earlier time when role models were role m...
Published: 01/15/18

Another voice: 38 minutes of fear in Hawaii

In 1938, Orson Welles panicked the nation with a false alarm about a Martian invasion in the radio broadcast The War of the Worlds. That was farfetched, of course. But what happened on Saturday, sadly, was not so hard to imagine — or believe.Authorit...
Published: 01/14/18
Updated: 01/16/18
Editorial: Florida’s chance to make it easier to restore civil rights

Editorial: Florida’s chance to make it easier to restore civil rights

As it has for decades, Florida stubbornly clings to an inhumane, inefficient and indefensible system of justice that permanently sentences more than 1.5 million residents to second-class citizenship. This state automatically revokes the right to vote...
Published: 01/13/18
Editorial: Speak out against Trump’s vulgar remarks

Editorial: Speak out against Trump’s vulgar remarks

President Donald Trump’s vulgar outbursts during a White House meeting on immigration are racist and indefensible no matter how he parses them. They are not presidential, they undermine U.S. foreign relations and they do not reflect America’s values....
Published: 01/12/18

Editorial: Pinellas commission stands up for accountability

The Pinellas County Commission has gotten the message that it should not be a rubber stamp. Commissioners sent a clear signal this week they will demand more accountability of local agencies by refusing to approve nominees for the board for CareerSou...
Published: 01/11/18
Updated: 01/12/18