Thursday, January 18, 2018
Opinion

Pay attention to the candidates' logic, or lack of it

In my youth, I naively believed that fact, logic and reason were all most people needed to make sound decisions on political issues that promote the greater good.

I also believed that a democracy needed an informed citizenry, and I believed that America had the world's most viable democracy because our citizens strived to be politically informed.

I learned years ago that I was wrong. Fact, logic and reason do not play much of a role in the political decisions of most Americans. Too many of us are misinformed or uninformed or ill-informed, or all three. Too many have become intellectually lazy when it comes to politics.

One result of this malady is that we fail to put politicians — those who make important decisions about our individual lives, the nation and the rest of the world — to the rigorous test of truth. Too many have learned to be comfortable with the blatant lies and rhetorical tricks of our leaders and would-be leaders.

I know I am spitting in the wind, but I want voters who watch the first debate between President Barack Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney on Wednesday night to set aside their emotions and listen for the logic in the candidates' arguments. Try to detect logical fallacies and when the candidates fail to use sound reasoning.

Keep in mind that the overwhelming majority of logical fallacies are intentional. They are honed by highly paid speechwriters. The candidates cynically believe fallacious arguments will be effective and win votes.

Below are a few fallacies to listen for as the candidates spar this week. My major source is The Bedford Handbook for Writers, Fourth Edition, by Diana Hacker:

• Hasty generalization: a conclusion drawn from insufficient or unrepresentative evidence that uses words such as never, every, always and all. A stereotype, often derogatory, is a hasty generalization. Obama suggested, for example, that rural Americans cling to their guns and religion. Romney described Obama supporters as people dependent on government largesse who see themselves as victims.

• Non sequitur: a conclusion that does not follow from what has been asserted or is derived from irrelevant information. Example: Romney is a Mormon; therefore, the White House will be run in Salt Lake City.

• False analogy: a comparison between two basically dissimilar things. Here is one we regularly hear: A person who has headed a successful multibillion-dollar private company is qualified to be president of the United States. Yes, both jobs require being in charge and making big decisions, but many of the challenges the president of a company faces are nothing like those the president of the world's lone superpower faces.

• Either/or fallacy: the assertion that there are only two alternatives when there actually are more. How often have you heard that if you don't finish college, you won't get a good job? Tell that to the dropouts making millions of dollars with the clever mobile apps they are producing. The truth is that many occupations do not require one day of college.

• Faculty cause-and-effect reasoning: the assumption that because one thing follows another, the second is the direct result of the first. This is a leap to an unverifiable conclusion. Example: Unemployment has dropped in Florida since Rick Scott became governor. "Clearly, the governor knows how to produce jobs," his spokeswoman says. Not so fast. Unemployment numbers may have dropped because officials do not count people who stopped looking for jobs. The reason also could be that the tourist season, which requires many workers, is kicking off as it always kicks off this time of year. Did the governor's policies have anything to do with this natural cycle?

• Appeals to emotion: An attempt to win sympathy instead of intelligent agreement. How many times have we heard a candidate implore us to vote for him because he hails, say, from coal-mining roots in rural West Virginia? His father died of black lung mere days before his son became a cadet at West Point. Ad hominem, Latin for "to the man," is an appeal to emotion. Here, you attack the man ("He's a Muslim") instead of logically refuting his stance on the issue.

From now until Nov. 6, we will be bombarded with exaggeration, lies, mud-slinging and every other rhetorical device as the candidates vie for the White House. I believe we have a duty as voters to pay close attention to the logic of what Romney and Obama utter on the stump and during the debates.

Comments
Editorial: More talk, answers needed on future of USF St. Petersburg

Editorial: More talk, answers needed on future of USF St. Petersburg

The Florida Legislature’s abrupt move to strip the University of South Florida St. Petersburg of its hard-earned separate accreditation and transform it back into a satellite of the major research university lacks detail and an appreciation for histo...
Updated: 9 hours ago

Another voice: Self-dealing by nursing home owners threatens patient care

The outsourcing of logistical support services, which became commonplace in the U.S. military in the 1990s and later was adopted by state prison systems, has now come to dominate the nursing home industry. And while nursing homes, unlike the military...
Published: 01/17/18
Editorial: Making illegal sewage discharges legal is wrong answer

Editorial: Making illegal sewage discharges legal is wrong answer

Three years into a crisis with its sewer system, St. Petersburg has a dandy new idea for dealing with the environmental fallout of dumping dirty water into the aquifer. Instead of committing to banning the outlawed practice, a consultant suggested th...
Published: 01/16/18
Updated: 01/17/18
Editorial: Tighten substitute teacher rules in Hillsborough

Editorial: Tighten substitute teacher rules in Hillsborough

A substitute teacher at a Plant City elementary school berated a class of fourth graders — and then the school principal. Another compared a student to a stripper. Others were caught napping, hitting children, making sexual remarks, giving students b...
Published: 01/16/18
Updated: 01/17/18
Editorial: Balancing the playing field for workers’ compensation

Editorial: Balancing the playing field for workers’ compensation

For the longest time, injured workers in Florida were basically at the mercy of the whims of employers to treat them fairly. A 2003 law aimed at reducing the cost of workers’ compensation coverage for businesses had the desired impact, but it also di...
Published: 01/16/18

Another voice: Why just Florida?

Cynicism has always been a part of politics, but rarely are politicians so brazen and self-serving as President Donald Trump and his interior secretary, Ryan Zinke, have been over the past week. First they announced a new offshore drilling plan that ...
Published: 01/16/18
Editorial: King’s legacy still relevant in digital age

Editorial: King’s legacy still relevant in digital age

Today’s holiday honoring the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. couldn’t be more timely. At a moment when the nation’s civic dialogue is choking on personal and political division, it is hard to remember an earlier time when role models were role m...
Published: 01/15/18

Another voice: 38 minutes of fear in Hawaii

In 1938, Orson Welles panicked the nation with a false alarm about a Martian invasion in the radio broadcast The War of the Worlds. That was farfetched, of course. But what happened on Saturday, sadly, was not so hard to imagine — or believe.Authorit...
Published: 01/14/18
Updated: 01/16/18
Editorial: Florida’s chance to make it easier to restore civil rights

Editorial: Florida’s chance to make it easier to restore civil rights

As it has for decades, Florida stubbornly clings to an inhumane, inefficient and indefensible system of justice that permanently sentences more than 1.5 million residents to second-class citizenship. This state automatically revokes the right to vote...
Published: 01/13/18
Editorial: Speak out against Trump’s vulgar remarks

Editorial: Speak out against Trump’s vulgar remarks

President Donald Trump’s vulgar outbursts during a White House meeting on immigration are racist and indefensible no matter how he parses them. They are not presidential, they undermine U.S. foreign relations and they do not reflect America’s values....
Published: 01/12/18