Thursday, January 18, 2018
Opinion

Ruth: Bondi's twisted logic on same-sex marriage

By Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi's legal eagle reasoning, if a federal court rules the state's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, the resulting chaos would be an Armageddon of paperwork, imploding Tallahassee's computers and wreaking havoc on the Swiss watch-like precision of government operations.

In short, Bondi argued in a brief to a lawsuit challenging Florida's ban on recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states that to do so would cause "significant public harm." And it was right about here that The Birdcage hit the fan.

Bondi's "public harm" line enraged Florida's gay community, who accused the attorney general of arguing same-sex marriage itself would cause great damage to the social fabric of the state. That is hardly a helpful image of discrimination to have in an election year.

The timing couldn't be worse for Bondi.

Days earlier, comments by Rep. Charles Van Zant, R-God of Hellfire, had suggested Common Core school standards were a conspiracy to turn the state's students into gays and lesbians. No one confuses Florida with the Age of Enlightenment.

Now, following Van Zant's dunderheaded campaign to compare Common Core with Angels in America, Bondi found herself being portrayed as the Attorney General of Flori-Phobia.

So the attorney general went into damage control, explaining her "significant public harm" comment had been taken out of context. Bondi noted it is her legal obligation to defend a Florida constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage that was overwhelmingly approved by voters in 2008.

"This case is not about which policy choice is better or worse," Bondi said in a statement. "And this case is not about whether the debate should continue (which it surely will). This case is about whether states can make their own determinations."

Fair enough.

But while Bondi would like everyone to believe her brief is a clear-eyed, dispassionate, objective view of her role as an attorney general defending a constitutional amendment, there is plenty to be found in its 34 pages to suggest otherwise.

To date, 19 states and the District of Columbia have embraced same-sex marriage, largely on the strength of the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. But Bondi argued the 14th Amendment doesn't apply to Florida's ban on same-sex marriage because the state's constitutional amendment "is rationally related to a legitimate state interest" and must be upheld "even if the law seems unwise or works to the disadvantage of a particular group, or if the rationale for it seems tenuous."

Bondi's tortured logic ignores the history of federal intervention in overturning a host of discriminatory state laws such as Jim Crow, separate but equal school policies and miscegenation statutes.

Then the attorney general turned her attention to her views on the core foundation of the institution of marriage — procreation of the species and "society's legitimate interest in increasing the likelihood that children will be born to and raised by mothers and fathers who produced them in a stable and enduring family units."

That sounds all very Walton family until you realize the most recent U.S. Census data lists Florida as ninth in the nation for its divorce rate.

Bondi argued that even if Florida's constitutional same-sex marriage ban was the handiwork of religious hand-wringers who feared a plague of locusts should Lance and Larry get hitched, it is still valid because "even if Florida's marriage law might have been enacted with the help of some with impermissible motives, the plaintiff's argument must fail because (it) is a familiar practice of constitutional law that this court will not strike down an otherwise constitutional statute on the basis of an alleged illicit legislative motive."

Is this a legal brief or an alibi?

Clearly Bondi's sympathies lie with the anti-same-sex marriage crowd, her tepid protestations to being an evenhanded legal broker notwithstanding.

But she saved her best legal palaver for last, arguing the state's gay marriage ban should remain in effect because to overturn it would be too hard.

The irreparable harm Bondi refers to is the difficulty in changing state computers to calculate insurance beneficiaries, retirement benefits and other services.

Almost half the country recognizes same-sex marriage without a software nuclear winter occurring. But by Bondi's logic, the fourth largest state can't figure out how to change state records to reflect a gay union? Does Bondi believe she is the attorney general of Florida? Or the Duchy of Grand Fenwick?

Comments
Editorial: More talk, answers needed on future of USF St. Petersburg

Editorial: More talk, answers needed on future of USF St. Petersburg

The Florida Legislature’s abrupt move to strip the University of South Florida St. Petersburg of its hard-earned separate accreditation and transform it back into a satellite of the major research university lacks detail and an appreciation for histo...
Updated: 9 hours ago

Another voice: Self-dealing by nursing home owners threatens patient care

The outsourcing of logistical support services, which became commonplace in the U.S. military in the 1990s and later was adopted by state prison systems, has now come to dominate the nursing home industry. And while nursing homes, unlike the military...
Published: 01/17/18
Editorial: Making illegal sewage discharges legal is wrong answer

Editorial: Making illegal sewage discharges legal is wrong answer

Three years into a crisis with its sewer system, St. Petersburg has a dandy new idea for dealing with the environmental fallout of dumping dirty water into the aquifer. Instead of committing to banning the outlawed practice, a consultant suggested th...
Published: 01/16/18
Updated: 01/17/18
Editorial: Tighten substitute teacher rules in Hillsborough

Editorial: Tighten substitute teacher rules in Hillsborough

A substitute teacher at a Plant City elementary school berated a class of fourth graders — and then the school principal. Another compared a student to a stripper. Others were caught napping, hitting children, making sexual remarks, giving students b...
Published: 01/16/18
Updated: 01/17/18
Editorial: Balancing the playing field for workers’ compensation

Editorial: Balancing the playing field for workers’ compensation

For the longest time, injured workers in Florida were basically at the mercy of the whims of employers to treat them fairly. A 2003 law aimed at reducing the cost of workers’ compensation coverage for businesses had the desired impact, but it also di...
Published: 01/16/18

Another voice: Why just Florida?

Cynicism has always been a part of politics, but rarely are politicians so brazen and self-serving as President Donald Trump and his interior secretary, Ryan Zinke, have been over the past week. First they announced a new offshore drilling plan that ...
Published: 01/16/18
Editorial: King’s legacy still relevant in digital age

Editorial: King’s legacy still relevant in digital age

Today’s holiday honoring the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. couldn’t be more timely. At a moment when the nation’s civic dialogue is choking on personal and political division, it is hard to remember an earlier time when role models were role m...
Published: 01/15/18

Another voice: 38 minutes of fear in Hawaii

In 1938, Orson Welles panicked the nation with a false alarm about a Martian invasion in the radio broadcast The War of the Worlds. That was farfetched, of course. But what happened on Saturday, sadly, was not so hard to imagine — or believe.Authorit...
Published: 01/14/18
Updated: 01/16/18
Editorial: Florida’s chance to make it easier to restore civil rights

Editorial: Florida’s chance to make it easier to restore civil rights

As it has for decades, Florida stubbornly clings to an inhumane, inefficient and indefensible system of justice that permanently sentences more than 1.5 million residents to second-class citizenship. This state automatically revokes the right to vote...
Published: 01/13/18
Editorial: Speak out against Trump’s vulgar remarks

Editorial: Speak out against Trump’s vulgar remarks

President Donald Trump’s vulgar outbursts during a White House meeting on immigration are racist and indefensible no matter how he parses them. They are not presidential, they undermine U.S. foreign relations and they do not reflect America’s values....
Published: 01/12/18