Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Opinion

Ruth: Gorsuch's bland confirmation hearings

In a court of law this would be undisputed prima facie evidence.

For it has been clearly demonstrated that federal appellate court Judge Neil Gorsuch is eminently qualified to become a justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, having survived a brutal grilling by the Senate Judiciary Committee in which the nominee had to defend his controversial positions on trout fishing, hiking, rodeos, riding sheep, basketball and the meaning of life. We can probably stipulate he thinks puppies are the cat's whiskers.

We're into some real Louis Brandeis territory here.

As a practical matter, it is likely that Gorsuch will be an able jurist once he is inevitably confirmed. It's not as if President Donald Trump tapped Steven Tyler for the high court because he did such a bang-up job as a judge on American Idol. But perhaps it's best not giving him any ideas.

The problem, of course, is that Supreme Court confirmation hearings hardly have become a reliable exercise in determining if one is fit to serve on the highest court in the land since the nominees have proven to be deathly afraid to reveal very much about their qualifications. It's almost as if to be elevated to the court, one must take a vow of omerta meets Marcel Marceau.

Robert Bork is often cited as the cause for all the reticence, recalling the House of Cards villain Francis Urquhart's common refrain: "You might very well think that. I couldn't possibly comment."

Bork, who was nominated to the bench by Ronald Reagan in 1987, possessed a keen legal mind and a brilliant grasp of jurisprudence. Just ask him. His scholarly legal acumen was widely available through his voluminous body of writing. And that proved to be his downfall.

Through the blurry prism of history, Bork's nomination process often has been characterized as unfair, highly partisan and rushed. But none of that is accurate.

Bork did indeed get a full and fair hearing. And out of that process, the nominee revealed himself to be a really, really scary guy. His views on women's rights were something out of the Middle Ages. He was less than supportive of the Voting Rights Act, which would have qualified him to serve on the Supreme Court — of South Carolina. He was an advocate for expanding the powers of the presidency. He was rather squishy as to the citizenry having an inherent constitutional right to privacy.

The nominee wasn't rejected because he was conservative. He was rejected because he was an extremist.

The hearing on his nomination did exactly what it was supposed to do — explore a judicial candidate's views and temperament for the job. And Bork was found wanting.

It is contrary to the revisionism that Bork was a tragic victim of partisanship. But the nominee was rejected by the Senate by a vote of 58 to 42, with six Republicans voting "nay." No matter. Since the Bork era, court appointees have feared having their nomination "Borked" if they dare to be too candid in expressing themselves. So we have a U.S. Supreme Court nominee publicly making out with his wife before the hearing starts and singing the praises of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Not quite the stuff of Sir William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England.

Since Bork, only two other nominees have been forced to withdraw their nominations. Douglas Ginsburg, who Reagan picked after the Bork debacle, stepped aside after he admitted to smoking marijuana as a college professor. How quaint. And President George W. Bush's pick of Harriet Miers quickly imploded after it became clear that Joe Pesci's character in My Cousin Vinny had a sharper legal mind.

And yes, there was the ill-fated nomination by President Barack Obama of Judge Merrick Garland, who had an impeccable professional and personal reputation, but was denied even a hearing by the Republican-controlled Senate. Whew, no partisanship there.

Gorsuch's confirmation has never really been in doubt. He has a laudable legal resume and lengthy experience on the appellate bench. And let's be honest. He looks and acts like a judge, which in these days of the Star Wars bar scene reflecting the inner workings of the White House is no small accomplishment.

Perhaps the only stone left unturned in fully vetting Gorsuch is the most pressing of questions, which still could be raised by that vigorous interrogator, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz.

"Judge Gorsuch, if you were a tree, what kind of tree would you be?"

Comments
Editorial: Habitat for Humanity still has questions to answer about selling mortgages

Editorial: Habitat for Humanity still has questions to answer about selling mortgages

A good reputation can vanish overnight, which is why Habitat for Humanity of Hills-borough County made a smart decision by announcing it would seek to buy back 12 mortgages it sold to a Tampa company with a history of flipping properties. The arrange...
Updated: 4 hours ago
Editorial: Why stand your ground has to go

Editorial: Why stand your ground has to go

Pinellas-Pasco State Attorney Bernie McCabe made a reasonable decision to charge Michael Drejka with manslaughter in last month’s deadly Clearwater convenience store parking lot confrontation. The shooting, which erupted over use of a handicap parkin...
Published: 08/13/18
Editorial: Politics aside, arguments are clear for moving appellate court to Tampa

Editorial: Politics aside, arguments are clear for moving appellate court to Tampa

It’s time to re-establish a permanent home for the state appeals court that serves the Tampa Bay region.It makes sense to put it in Tampa, the same as it made sense 30 years ago when the court’s operations began moving piece by piece up Interstate 4 ...
Published: 08/09/18
Updated: 08/10/18
Editorial: A big first step toward improving transportation in Hillsborough

Editorial: A big first step toward improving transportation in Hillsborough

The Hillsborough County transit referendum that has made the November ballot is significantly stronger than two efforts that failed to reach the end zone in the past decade. The one-cent sales surtax would generate enough money to meaningfully improv...
Published: 08/09/18
Editorial: Bondi should stop fighting smokable medicial marijuana

Editorial: Bondi should stop fighting smokable medicial marijuana

The fight for medical marijuana in Florida should have ended with the resounding 2016 vote authorizing it in the state Constitution. Instead, the battle for access drags on, with Attorney General Pam Bondi waging the latest round in a lengthy legal b...
Published: 08/07/18
Updated: 08/10/18
Editorial: Warning signs of a mental health crisis in Florida

Editorial: Warning signs of a mental health crisis in Florida

They reach from South Florida to Tampa, from a high school to a college campus, from troubled kids to troubled parents. But there is a common thread connecting these tragedies: Florida has a mental health crisis. Addressing it would require spending ...
Published: 08/07/18
Updated: 08/10/18
Editorial: Time to pursue or sink ferry to MacDill

Editorial: Time to pursue or sink ferry to MacDill

A proposal to use local money to ferry workers to MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa always has been a questionable idea. The loss of nearly $5 million in federal money toward the project makes it all the more suspect. It’s time the ferry supporters off...
Published: 08/07/18
Updated: 08/10/18
Blood on the streets of Chicago

Blood on the streets of Chicago

A hot summer weekend, when Chicago should be at its most livable, brings an undercurrent of dread and horror to this city. Summer is block party season, beach season, baseball season. But in some neighborhoods, summer is killing season — when armed g...
Published: 08/07/18
Updated: 08/10/18
Editorial: FDA should not penalize premium cigars

Editorial: FDA should not penalize premium cigars

A well-meaning but poorly designed effort to keep tobacco from children could sink a niche industry and end Tampa’s fabled history as a cigar-making capital. The Food and Drug Administration needs to recognize not all tobacco products are alike...
Published: 08/06/18
Updated: 08/13/18
Editorial: New St. Petersburg Pier spot for Echelman art better, not perfect

Editorial: New St. Petersburg Pier spot for Echelman art better, not perfect

The St. Petersburg City Council has listened to the concerns of constituents and forged a compromise on where to install a signature public art piece in the new Pier District. Plans had called for an imposing aerial net sculpture to soar above Spa Be...
Published: 08/06/18
Updated: 08/07/18