Friday, May 25, 2018
Opinion

So you hate Obamacare; now what?

June 28 was the easy part for conservatives, well, except for learning that the chief justice who once talked about calling balls and strikes also has a wicked curveball.

But cranking out the press releases, from think tanks, candidates, House and Senate offices, and one presumptive presidential nominee, obviously wasn't difficult. And two words shared top billing in almost all of them: Repeal and Replace.

Now comes the hard part, assuming opponents of the Affordable Care Act are ever actually in a position to pull off repeal. Replace Obamacare with what?

Strict constructionists might argue that there's no reason to go beyond repeal, that this is just a matter of getting the government out of the business of health care. But unless they also repeal Medicaid, Medicare, the Department of Veterans Affairs and a host of other programs, government is in health care to stay. Therefore what needs addressing is the government's business model for health care, which is exacerbating the problems, especially the spiraling costs.

Reforms in the nation's health care system have been desperately needed for a long time, but conservatives refused to recognize this and act, according to the article "How to Replace Obamacare" in the spring edition of the journal National Affairs.

"If the problems that are today obvious to the public had been addressed by market-oriented policies over the past few decades, there would have been no political opening through which to ram Obamacare," write James C. Capretta and Robert E. Moffit, fellows at, respectively, the American Enterprise Institute and the Heritage Foundation.

To do away with the costly, intrusive, tax-increasing Obamacare, which has now been blessed by the Supreme Court, means dealing with the issues — among them costs, the uninsured, covering pre-existing conditions — that inspired the push for reform.

The authors note that scores of plans offer a market-based approach to health care — the only real way to control costs and make coverage both affordable and accessible — but they all share seven core "pillars." (I'll give highlights, but read the whole article at nationalaffairs.com, looking under "archives" for either author's name.)

One, "move American health care away from open-ended government subsidies and tax breaks, and toward a defined-contribution system." Health coverage would come from competing insurance plans, and government would make a fixed contribution toward each person's insurance purchase — tax credits for most taxpayers, and more generous subsidies for those on Medicaid and Medicare. Pick a plan more expensive than the contribution, and you make up the difference. A cheaper one allows you to keep the savings. Under this plan, the health care tax break goes to individuals, not employers.

Two, forget the coercive individual mandate. Instead, the government promises that individuals won't face the high premiums associated with costly illness providing they stay enrolled in health insurance. This would require a host of changes to federal law and insurance regulations to fill the current gaps, for example when people move from one job to another, and to ensure coverage for those with pre-existing conditions.

Three, recognize the varied demographics and economic conditions in the states and give them leeway in implementing any new programs. Set guidelines but allow as much flexibility as possible.

Four, move toward individual federal tax credits for health care and away from a policy that favors employer-sponsored health plans that distort the market, limit portability and the transparency of costs, and discriminate against lower-income workers and employees of small businesses.

Five, work with states to reform Medicaid so recipients no longer have to refuse jobs for fear of losing health insurance, or be discriminated against by care providers who won't accept Medicaid because reimbursement rates are too low. One option would be to offer subsidies of similar value or better to the credits that taxpayers would receive under a reformed system.

Six, gradually reform fee-for-service Medicare to a premium-support plan, leaving current and near-term recipients with no changes, but phasing in a market approach similar to Medicare's prescription drug program. This would ensure the system outlasts the baby boomers, who will boost Medicare enrollment from 47 million to more than 80 million by 2030.

Seven, offset new costs — especially the subsidies and tax breaks — with spending cuts elsewhere. Even "replace" won't be cheap.

Any one of these proposals would be a heavy lift for a Congress or president, even if they all got along. But without such pro-market reforms, there is no way to get control of costs or give consumers more health care choices. Conservatives who are serious about "replace" will recognize this, and be ready to move from press releases to policy changes.

Kevin Ferris is assistant editor of the editorial page of the Philadelphia Inquirer.

© 2012, The Philadelphia Inquirer

Comments
Editorial: Filling Rocky Point lagoon to build townhomes is an empty-headed idea

Editorial: Filling Rocky Point lagoon to build townhomes is an empty-headed idea

One of the worst ideas in a long time in the field of urban planning received a blessing this month when the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission approved a land-use change for a project that calls for filling three acres of water insi...
Published: 05/25/18
Editorial: Searching for the real Adam Putnam

Editorial: Searching for the real Adam Putnam

Send out an Amber Alert for Adam Putnam. The red-haired, affable fellow who has served capably as a state legislator, member of Congress and agriculture commissioner is missing. In his place is a far-right caricature who has branded himself as a prou...
Updated: 2 hours ago
Editorial: A strong economic case for restoring voting rights for felons

Editorial: A strong economic case for restoring voting rights for felons

Floridians are paying a steep price for a system that makes it as difficult as possible for people who leave prison to reintegrate into civic life. Gov. Rick Scott’s clemency process isn’t just archaic and cruel — it also wastes enormous public resou...
Updated: 2 hours ago
Editorial: Trump right to cancel North Korea talks on nuclear weapons

Editorial: Trump right to cancel North Korea talks on nuclear weapons

Regardless of the reason, the cancellation of the U.S.-North Korea summit to address Pyonyang’s nuclear program is hardly the worst possible outcome of this high-stakes diplomatic gamble. President Donald Trump was unprepared, North Korea’s Kim Jong ...
Updated: 10 hours ago

NFL kneels before the altar of profits

The owners of the 32 National Football League teams sent a wrongheaded and, frankly, un-American message to their players Wednesday: Expressing your opinion during the national anthem is no longer permitted."A club will be fined by the League if its ...
Published: 05/24/18

Editorial: A positive first step in ensuring student access at USFSP

As a task force sorts out countless details involved in folding the University of South Florida St. Petersburg back into the major research university based in Tampa, ensuring access for good Pinellas students remains a concern. An enhanced cooperati...
Updated: 2 hours ago
Editorial: Banks still need watching after easing Dodd-Frank rules

Editorial: Banks still need watching after easing Dodd-Frank rules

Legislation that waters down the 2010 Dodd-Frank law and was sent to President Donald Trump this week is a mixed bag at best. Some provisions recognize that Congress may have gone too far in some areas in the wake of the Great Recession to place new ...
Published: 05/23/18
Updated: 05/24/18

Another voice: The chutzpah of these men

A new phase of the #MeToo movement may be upon us. Call it the "not so fast" era: Powerful men who plotted career comebacks mere months after being taken down by accusations of sexual misconduct now face even more alarming claims.Mario Batali, the ce...
Published: 05/22/18
Updated: 05/23/18
Editorial: Candor key step to restoring trust at Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute

Editorial: Candor key step to restoring trust at Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute

Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital has begun the important work of rebuilding trust with its patients and the community following revelations of medical errors and other problems at its Heart Institute. CEO Dr. Jonathan Ellen candidly acknowledges...
Published: 05/22/18
Updated: 05/23/18
Editorial: Tampa Bay House members fail to stand up to Big Sugar

Editorial: Tampa Bay House members fail to stand up to Big Sugar

Big Sugar remains king in Florida. Just three of the state’s 27 House members voted for an amendment to the farm bill late Thursday that would have started unwinding the needless government supports for sugar that gouge taxpayers. Predictably, the am...
Published: 05/18/18