Thursday, December 14, 2017
Opinion

St. Petersburg residents deserve to be heard on fate of the Pier

For elected officials, nonsense is an occupational hazard.

Nonsense emails. Nonsense residents. Hard as it is to believe, even nonsense columnists.

The gifted politician learns to sift through this. To correct it when possible and ignore it when inevitable. Most importantly, to recognize when nonsense graduates to substance.

Which brings us to the Pier in St. Petersburg.

There has been a tremendous amount of needless whining, carping and finger-pointing on this issue in recent years. Lots of bad information and tons of misguided sentimentality.

But through it all, there is a growing vibe that the Lens concept has not been well-received by a significant portion of the population.

And it's time for the City Council to recognize that.

Council members could argue that no design will ever have universal acceptance, and that is absolutely true.

They could argue the city has already invested countless hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars, and that is also true.

They could even argue that they have no legal obligation to bring this issue to a ballot, and that is technically true.

But in the end, people deserve to be heard.

Because, while I acknowledge this process has been completely open and painfully slow-moving, I also think it has somehow crept up on a lot of people.

Folks never grasped that the combination of a deteriorating Pier, a bunch of nebulous concepts and some strict financial restraints would evolve into a here's-the-best-we've-got result.

And that's why city leaders should consider this alternative:

Instead of a binding referendum, turn it into an advisory vote. The City Council would retain final say but would also have a clearer picture of what residents want.

The ballot could include a handful of options (a. build the Lens, b. build an attraction on waterfront land with a smaller ceremonial pier, c. knock down the Pier and continue studying potential replacements) with the financial implications included.

It would also give the City Council a final chance to hammer home the reality that the current Pier has to come down.

Not only would it cost too much to renovate (up to $90 million), but it draws fewer visitors (half of what it was getting 10 years ago) and is a drain on the city budget (about $10 million during the past seven years).

The simple truth is, it would be financial folly to pour that much money into a concept that no longer seems viable.

So does that mean a largely ornamental pier such as the Lens makes more sense? Does it mean the city should give up on the expense of building above water, and instead build a grander attraction on the waterfront?

Those are questions an advisory vote could answer.

"Frankly, the process has to slow down to see if there is a way to amend the Lens plan into something that people will accept,'' council member Karl Nurse said. "Since we are one year from beginning to tear down the Pier, I do not think a several-month delay in a plan will have a significant negative impact.

"It is going to be there for 50 years or so; several months should not matter.''

There may or may not be a better solution out there.

And residents deserve a say in that decision.

Comments
Editorial: Rubio should make good his threat to oppose tax cuts without changes

Editorial: Rubio should make good his threat to oppose tax cuts without changes

For once, it would be nice to see Sen. Marco Rubio stand up as the independent leader he aspires to become. For once, the Florida Republican should hold his position rather than bow to pragmatic politics. Rubio can stick with his threat Thursday to v...
Updated: 2 hours ago

Another voice: A shameful anniversary

Josephine "Joey" Gay should have celebrated her 12th birthday this week. She should have been surrounded by friends and family in a place festooned with purple, her favorite color.Chase Kowalski should have been working toward a Boy Scout merit badge...
Updated: 3 hours ago
Editorial: Congress should block efforts to expand offshore drilling

Editorial: Congress should block efforts to expand offshore drilling

Timing is everything, and Sen. Bill Nelson seized the right moment this week to call on his colleagues to pass legislation he filed earlier this year that would block the Trump administration from opening additional areas to offshore drilling. With t...
Published: 12/13/17

Another voice: Alabama picks an honorable man

THANK YOU, Alabama.In Tuesday’s special election, the state by a narrow margin chose to spare the nation the indignity of seating an accused child molester in the U.S. Senate. Though the stain of electing Republican Roy Moore would have sullied Alaba...
Published: 12/12/17
Updated: 12/13/17
Editorial: Tax cuts aren’t worth harm to Tampa Bay

Editorial: Tax cuts aren’t worth harm to Tampa Bay

As congressional negotiators hammer out the details on an enormous, unnecessary tax cut, the potential negative impact on Tampa Bay and Florida is becoming clearer. The harmful consequences stretch far beyond adding more than $1.4 trillion to the fed...
Published: 12/12/17

Another voice: Privacy in the internet age

How much information about you is on your cellphone? Likely the most intimate details of your life: photographs, internet searches, text and email conversations with friends and colleagues. And though you might not know it, your phone is constantly c...
Published: 12/10/17
Updated: 12/11/17
Editorial: Grand jury could force reforms of juvenile justice system

Editorial: Grand jury could force reforms of juvenile justice system

Confronted with documentation of sanctioned brutality and sexual abuse in Florida’s juvenile detention centers, the reaction from Gov. Rick Scott’s administration was defensive and obtuse. So it’s welcome news that Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine...
Published: 12/08/17
Updated: 12/11/17

Editorial: U.S. House sides with NRA over state’s rights on concealed weapons permits

With the horror of the mass shootings at a Las Vegas country music concert and a small Texas church still fresh, the U.S. House finally has taken action on guns. But the bill it passed last week won’t make Americans safer from gun violence. It is an ...
Published: 12/07/17
Editorial: Hillsborough cannot afford pay raises for teachers

Editorial: Hillsborough cannot afford pay raises for teachers

There is no satisfaction for anyone in the standoff over pay raises between the Hillsborough County School District and its teachers. Most teachers across the nation already are underpaid, but this district simply cannot afford the raises teachers ex...
Published: 12/07/17
Editorial: Impact of Water Street project extends beyond buildings

Editorial: Impact of Water Street project extends beyond buildings

With a buildout of $3 billion encompassing entire city blocks, it’s obvious that Jeff Vinik’s plans will change the look and feel of downtown Tampa. But the Tampa Bay Lightning owner unveiled a broader vision last week that reflects how far the impac...
Published: 12/06/17
Updated: 12/08/17