Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

Teach sex ed built on facts, not dogma

By A Times Editorial
In print: Friday, March 21, 2008


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

On some issues the public is ahead of its political leaders. Sex education is one of them. By substantial margins, Floridians favor providing students with information about sexually transmitted disease prevention and contraception rather than just an abstinence-only approach favored by the Bush administration. The Legislature should hear this call and put the health of Florida's teens ahead of a narrow, religiously grounded agenda.

According to a recent St. Petersburg Times poll, of the nine in 10 Florida voters who agree that the public schools should offer some form of sex eduction, only 8 percent said it should be abstinence-only. Even those respondents who described themselves as evangelical Christians generally thought the education program needed to go beyond abstinence.

The poll was taken even before the explosive results of a study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were known. That study found at least one in four teenage girls in this country has a sexually transmitted disease. That startling statistic makes it even more imperative that young people receive information that leads to sound and informed decisions about sex.

Although school districts in the state are allowed to teach beyond abstinence-only, Florida receives as much as $10-million annually in federal sex education money to offer abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. The results have been demonstrably counterproductive. Research shows that abstinence-only programs don't work in delaying teen sexual activity or reducing the number of sexual partners. But recently released CDC data found that sex education programs help to keep teens from becoming sexually active before 15 years of age. There also is evidence that such programs reduce the prevalence of unprotected sex.

Abstinence needs to be discussed in any sex education program, but it should be part of a comprehensive, scientifically based and age-appropriate curriculum that gives young people the tools they need to prevent unwanted pregnancy and disease.

Florida has the sixth highest teen pregnancy rate in the country, with nearly 50,000 teens becoming pregnant annually. It is also a leader in new AIDS cases. In the last fiscal year, Florida spent $3.5-million on abstinence-only programs on top of the federal money. Here is an expenditure that deserves scrutiny from lawmakers looking to reduce spending.

Another good step would be passage of the Healthy Teens Act (SB 848, HB 449), which would push school districts to move beyond abstinence-only programs. It would require those public schools that already offer information on pregnancy, family planning or sexually transmitted diseases to include a comprehensive curriculum. For the health and future of Florida's young people, lawmakers should listen to a large majority of their constituents and make this measure a priority.



[Last modified: Mar 24, 2008 11:39 AM]



Comments on this article
by J.A. Mar 24, 2008 11:38 AM
It always amazes me that peolpe try to make this a religious argument to showcase their bigotry. This is not about religion, but about common sense. There is no way you will get an STD if you are not sleeping around. Period.
by Mark Mar 24, 2008 11:38 AM
Here's a fact: If you don't engage in risky behavior, your chances of contracting an STD or getting pregnant are practically zero. But, why shoot for an A+ when you can shoot for a C or lower? So what if the casualty count is higher
by Donetta Mar 24, 2008 11:38 AM
I'LL STAY OUT OF YOUR CHURCHES IF YOU STAY OUT OF MY CLASSROOMS!!!!! SEPARATION OF CHURCH OF STATE!!!!! PEOPLE GET REAL!!!!!
by Moses Mar 23, 2008 6:05 PM
Finally ... some common sense silver linings in the horrific aftermath of Hurricane Bush.
by Lee Mar 23, 2008 6:05 PM
Why did your editorial board endorse all of the Pinellas board members who believe abstinence only is a good idea? The one that wants to "keep it all out of the classroom" counts. You endorsed religious fanatics who laugh at science.
by ted Mar 21, 2008 5:14 PM
time for folks who "believe" the earth was "created" in six days to keep their ignorant noses out of science and responsible parenting!! their approach is like giving kids the car keys without drivers ed, saying only, "dont
by numi Mar 21, 2008 12:18 PM
The abstinenece-only morons don't care about effectiveness. It's all about kowtowing to their Invisible Sky Fairies. Religion is the root of all stupid.
by Ann Mar 21, 2008 10:06 AM
Kudos to the St. Pete Times for its support of common sense sex education! Florida's teens are at risk and it's time to address the problem with education instead of ignorance.
by Christian Mar 21, 2008 10:06 AM
I agree that students should know about sexually transmitted disease prevention and contraception. However, abstinence till marriage should always be taught as the best option for our children, because it is the best and safest option!
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT