Multimedia report
Owning vs. renting
The end of the real estate boom has led to a community mix that some owner-occupants say they didn't bargain for. See detailed, clickable maps with data for your neighborhood.
- More multimedia reports
|
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
We were unable to send your email.
Click here to try again.
Tax plan is bankrupt
By
A Times Editorial
In print: Wednesday, March 26, 2008
With one vote today, the Florida Taxation and Budget Reform Commission can undermine its previous good work and strangle the state's future. The commission is scheduled to decide the fate of a proposed constitutional amendment that masquerades as a taxpayer's bill of rights but is backed by antitax extremists whose goal is to starve government. It is not worthy of the voters' consideration, and it would be irresponsible for the commission to place it on the ballot. This amendment would require voter approval of all new taxes and fees at any level of government. It also would limit the increase in revenue collected by state and local governments to 1 percent over the previous year, plus an adjustment to reflect inflation and population growth. Existing fees could be increased or the revenue cap could be exceeded only by a two-thirds vote of the Legislature or the local government board. This is a simplistic approach that may find appeal with voters frustrated by property taxes and the worsening economy, but it would create gridlock in a state that already faces more than its share of challenges. Voters elect legislators, city council members, county commissioners and school board members to make decisions about raising revenue and spending priorities. This amendment eviscerates that democratic form of government in favor of direct democracy that is unworkable in the modern age and in communities so large and diverse. This is an era that requires leadership, not ironclad spending formulas and popular votes on every new tax or fee. It also is no panacea; Colorado voters agreed to loosen similar restrictions after that state began to strangle itself and could not meet the needs of its residents. Taxes in Florida are unfair in many ways, from the inequities in property taxes created by Save Our Homes to the special interest exemptions that riddle the state sales tax. But this is not a high-tax state, and there already are plenty of hurdles to tax increases. Just a year ago, the Legislature imposed by statute new revenue caps on local governments. Extraordinary votes are required for new taxes to be approved by the Legislature and for new taxes to be added to the Constitution by the voters. The idea that Floridians are vulnerable to wild, irresponsible tax increases does not square with the facts. Florida has enough tax and spending limits to digest and an apparent recession to overcome without this fight over a draconian amendment. There are the revenue caps from last year, and there are the changes to property taxes in Amendment 1 that were approved by the voters in January. In November, voters will have an opportunity to vote on another amendment that would substantially lower school property taxes and require the Legislature to replace the money by relying on a mix of options that include raising the state sales tax, cutting spending, raising other taxes or closing sales tax exemptions. Adding a misnamed taxpayer protection amendment on the ballot would only create more confusion and make it more difficult to provide the services and quality of life all Floridians want. The Taxation and Budget Reform Commission should defeat this amendment today and spare this state a long fight over a proposal that has no redeeming qualities.
[Last modified: Mar 28, 2008 01:57 PM]
Comments on this article
|
by Frank
|
Mar 28, 2008 1:57 PM
|
|
Government is a cancer on our freedom. The money stolen in taxes is the blood supply that lets it continue to metastasize. Anything that deprives government of money improves our lives
|
|
by Eric
|
Mar 28, 2008 1:45 PM
|
|
It's the long time residents with tiny tax bills that need to pay their fair share. FL governments depended on new residents and the lofty taxes they pay to operate. Long timers are parasites on these people, but ate 1st to complain about budget
|
|
by Steve
|
Mar 27, 2008 9:22 AM
|
|
Colorado has the Tabor Amendment, and it works beautifully to keep government spending and taxation in check. Has been in place for years. Also requires government bodies can not tax more than their budgets and limits budget growth ti inflation index
|
|
by John
|
Mar 26, 2008 6:37 PM
|
|
Darb, you do not know how insurance-risk management works. Your current insurance bill probably does not even cover the risks associated with your property. Taxpayers are most likely subsidizing your bill already. Use the tax savings for your pr
|
|
by Let Voters Decide
|
Mar 26, 2008 3:36 PM
|
|
I disagree. We must place strict limits on existing and new taxes in the Florida Constitution. Property taxes of must be repealed. Replaced by an accross the board sales tax of ten percent. Governments must live within a strict budget. No excuses!
|
|
by darb
|
Mar 26, 2008 1:42 PM
|
|
I find that my largest financial drain has been property insurance increases. This is money that I spend and receive nothing at all. Our tax dollars support our schools, parks, social services, ect.. Why are we directing our anger toward taxes?
|
|
by Buzzard
|
Mar 26, 2008 1:41 PM
|
|
So let me get this straight. If inflation...and hopefully my paycheck...go up 3% each year for the next 10 years...30% total... government revenue can only go up 40% (!!!!) PLUS whatever they decided was necessary for "
|
|
by Jeff
|
Mar 26, 2008 1:23 PM
|
|
The tax bill is unfair but what else is new about Florida, home of confused voters. Once they cut taxes and get rid of government, Florida will revert to being a jungle. Perversely,that will be the mother of all environmental accomplishments.
|
|
by Eric
|
Mar 26, 2008 11:58 AM
|
|
Why should my family care about the alleged unfairness of this latest plan? We bought property in this State last summer and were astonished by the inequity of the property tax cap and discount and portability. All this with values plummeting!
|
|
by rd
|
Mar 26, 2008 9:41 AM
|
|
Clearly your paper is out of touch and represents a narrow view most likely that of some cronies you have in government. Amendment One was a wakeup call weren’t you listening?
|
|
by JP
|
Mar 26, 2008 9:39 AM
|
|
Who and what organizations are the antitax extremist's mentioned in the article? Jim Scott is the sponsor of this bill.
|
|
by Charles
|
Mar 26, 2008 9:31 AM
|
|
The reason I support this tax amendment is that our elected officials have historically proven that they have little if any fiscal responsibility and seeming little concern for their constituents welfare.
|
|
by Bob
|
Mar 26, 2008 9:29 AM
|
|
Outstanding! Should be required reading for every voter. I wonder how many taxpayer dollars would be wasted paying for all of the extra ballots this ridiculous measure would impose.
|
|
by John Donson
|
Mar 26, 2008 9:18 AM
|
|
If this plan is to Rob Peter to Pay Paul I'm not for it. If govt cant cut spending first and prove they have done this, I'm not in favor of new taxes or shifting taxes. Just live within your means. If I want a pay raise I work longer. I don
|
|
by Ronnie
|
Mar 26, 2008 9:18 AM
|
|
This is the result of out of control spending at all levels of government. Government has brought this on themselves. The people are pulling in the leash and tying it very short.
|
|
by Casey
|
Mar 26, 2008 9:04 AM
|
|
The majority of the people of Florida disagree with your newspaper's viewpoint. Amendment 1 was a mandate that Floridians has had it with the outrageous spending of local governments. I say put this amendment on the ballot and let the voters dec
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
|