Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

Close beef loophole for safety's sake


In print: Thursday, April 3, 2008


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

It shouldn't take the largest meat recall in history and a lawsuit by an animal protection group to make the U.S. Department of Agriculture do its job. Apparently that is the only way it will happen.

The Humane Society of the United States, not the USDA, exposed unlawful practices at a California slaughterhouse. Lame and potentially sick dairy cows were subjected to extremely cruel treatment and slaughtered for meat that ended up in school lunches. The Humane Society conducted an undercover investigation, then warned schools in dozens of states of the risk (including some in the Tampa Bay area).

All of that was the USDA's responsibility, yet it still took the agency another week to shut down the slaughterhouse and more than two weeks to recall a record 143-million pounds of beef. By then most of the meat had been eaten. This is enough to give anyone heartburn about the government's indifference to food safety.

It all happened because the USDA quietly weakened a regulation established in 2004, after the first domestic case of mad cow disease, that was supposed to keep nonambulatory animals out of the human food supply. But there's money to be made on so-called downer cattle. So the meat industry lobbied for, and got, a loophole that allowed downer cattle to be slaughtered if the USDA first determined each animal wasn't diseased.

At the California plant, workers just waited for the federal inspector to leave for the day, then moved downer cows to slaughter by any means necessary. The Humane Society recorded workers ramming disabled cows with a forklift, giving helpless animals an electrical shock, jabbing them in the eye or forcing water down their noses.

Even when the USDA inspector approved cows for slaughter at the plant, it was after only a brief once-over of about 30 animals at a time. Such insufficient scrutiny is unlikely to detect diseased animals.

In its lawsuit, the Humane Society says the loophole violates two federal laws — requiring humane slaughter and inspections to protect people from tainted meat. To avoid another massive meat recall, "we should not hesitate to close this legal loophole and establish an unambiguous no-downer policy," said Humane Society president Wayne Pacelle.

Congress should not have to wait for the courts to pass a permanent exclusion of downer cattle from the food supply. Lawmakers should require a humane end for nonambulatory animals and make the USDA enforce the law even if it means upsetting the meat industry.



[Last modified: Apr 03, 2008 03:35 PM]



Comments on this article
by kitty Apr 3, 2008 3:35 PM
If you're concerned about the meat products you consume, buy Kosher. A Rabbi inspects the slaughterhouse and oversees the humane slaughter of the cows. I buy organic and trust the producers to do the right thing for premium prices charged.
by Jeremy Apr 3, 2008 12:59 PM
Republican values at work. Godloving people. Defenders of America. Law abiding citizens. And the workers who did that? No problem, you get used to it, actually helping the cow , it's OK to torture humans or cows. You won't taste it any
by geezersgal Apr 3, 2008 12:59 PM
Congress can pass all the laws they want but it still has to be signed by pro-business Bush who has quietly weakened most agencies that are supposed to protect the public. Not enough Democrats in congress to override a veto.
by Dan Apr 3, 2008 12:59 PM
This is very disturbing. In today's world we expect more from our government - not less.
by me Apr 3, 2008 12:58 PM
i think i won't be eating any more beef products. not only will i be healthier and have more money, i won't have to fel guilty about the inhumane way these poor animals are treated.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT