Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
  • Owning vs. renting
    The end of the real estate boom has led to a community mix that some owner-occupants say they didn't bargain for. See detailed, clickable maps with data for your neighborhood.
  • More multimedia reports
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
A Times Editorial

House Republicans bail on Everglades preservation, cleanup


In print: Saturday, April 5, 2008


[Associated Press]
Social Bookmarking [+]
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

Until House Republican budget writers were handed sharp pens last month, land preservation and Everglades cleanup enjoyed enduring bipartisan support in Florida. Now, as far as the House budget is concerned, preservation is yesterday's news.

House leaders are casting their decision to delete the entire $500-million allocation for Florida Forever land-buying and Everglades cleanup as an agonizing choice in a difficult budget year. But state revenue has dropped by 7 percent, not 100 percent, which suggests that belt-tightening is not the only motivation.

House Speaker Marco Rubio has publicly questioned the state's role in environmental regulation, even hinting recently that the Department of Environmental Protection could be abolished. His chamber's proposed budget, aside from the cuts to land-buying and Everglades cleanup, would also remove $175-million from trust funds designed to support environmental causes.

The Everglades portion already has caught the attention of Congress, which agreed in 2000 to share cleanup costs. "Florida's congressional delegation has been outspoken in support of ... increased federal funding," a bipartisan congressional group wrote to Rubio. "We believe that if the state ... now chooses to stop funding its share of this historic agreement, it will undermine the ability to secure federal funding now and in the future."

The Senate is unlikely to agree to the House's radical approach on the Everglades and land conservation. But the House Republican proposal should not be easily forgotten. It speaks to an ideological opportunism and an environmental hostility that voters might want to remember in the fall.



[Last modified: Apr 07, 2008 12:30 PM]



Comments on this article
by jimmy Apr 7, 2008 12:30 PM
a bogus claim: BOTH political parties have dirty hands here. Ask Bob Graham and the late Lawton Chiles about their roles in the Everglades mess!
by Jose Apr 7, 2008 12:30 PM
The GOP wants to destroy all of Florida
by Sam Apr 7, 2008 12:29 PM
I don't think anything that does not promote Marco Rubio's agenda makes a bit of difference to him. He needs to be voted OUT of public service.
by john Apr 7, 2008 12:29 PM
CONSERVatives. what a joke. don't remember the year, but Bush made Superfund taxpayer, instead of polluter, responsibility. now this. keep acting like the air and water aren't what keep you alive, that just dollar bills do. see how that wo
by kitty Apr 7, 2008 12:29 PM
Keep it up Marco. Soon Florida will be a vast, uninhabited wasteland as residents begin a mass-exodus out of here, and nobody moves in to take our place. Then you'll be out of a job.
by Wetlandman Apr 7, 2008 11:51 AM
It is unethical for Marco Rubio to suggest to abolish the FDEP at a time of mounting evidence and warning signs that our fragile ecosystems and health of its citizens in Florida are facing increasing threats.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT