Detours: a country in search of direction
On the eve of the election, a reporter and photographer set out for Washington, via America. We tell stories from seven towns, touching on seven issues from politics and real life.
Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
Sami Al-Arian is not a sympathetic figure, and the former University of South Florida computer science teacher who has admitted ties to the terrorist group Palestinian Islamic Jihad can't be deported soon enough. However, the Justice Department apparently is not through with him. It appears ready to erase the line between prosecution and persecution in this case.
The department was clearly embarrassed when Al-Arian, a man it accused of being a leading organizer for the PIJ in North America, was acquitted on eight charges related to international terrorist activities after a six-month trial. The jury also deadlocked on the remaining nine counts. Since then, the department has attempted to exact revenge for its own prosecutorial failures. In exchange for what Al-Arian thought was an end to his legal ordeal and a quick ticket to deportation, he agreed in 2006 to plead guilty to one count of conspiring to aid the PIJ. He was sentenced to 57 months, much of which he had already served while awaiting trial.
But before his sentence was fully served, Al-Arian was subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury in Virginia. Al-Arian refused, contending that part of his plea agreement with the department was that it terminated all business between him and the government. Al-Arian refused to sign the plea deal until boilerplate language about future cooperation with prosecutors was removed. But the government claims that all it agreed to was not to charge Al-Arian on facts already in evidence.
So far, two federal courts, including a unanimous decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in January, have found against Al-Arian. The courts said the plea agreement does not protect Al-Arian from being called before a grand jury and compelled to testify following a grant of immunity from prosecution.
Al-Arian has refused to cooperate, however, and has been held in prison under civil contempt citations.
As thing stand, a federal judge in Virginia has ended Al-Arian's confinement for civil contempt and his criminal sentence has been fully served. Al-Arian is on deck for deportation, probably to Gaza in the Palestinian territories. Except there may be a glitch. The Justice Department is apparently considering charging Al-Arian with criminal contempt — a charge that carries no maximum penalty. He could be facing another decade or more in prison if convicted.
Al-Arian's attorneys thought they had an understanding with federal prosecutors that he would not be asked to participate in any additional proceedings. Unfortunately, his attorneys didn't get that explicit language in the plea agreement. By exploiting this lapse, the Justice Department has been able to keep Al-Arian in prison beyond the agreed upon limits. If the department now seeks a criminal contempt charge, it will be attempting to achieve through legal manipulation what it could not secure through the jury process.
Al-Arian has been exposed for what he is — a liar and a supporter of terrorism directed at Israel. He has been incarcerated since February 2003. It's time to send him packing.
[Last modified: Apr 29, 2008 09:15 AM]
Comments on this article
by Ken
Apr 29, 2008 9:15 AM
This creep who wants all of us dead should have been dealt with long ago.
by Issywise
Apr 28, 2008 11:02 AM
Gee, I was under the impression that the duty to testify truthfully in court was important in America, but I guess the sensibility that excuses reporters from testifying in court should apply to Mr. Al-Arian. Some think his silence makes him a h
by Yvonne
Apr 28, 2008 10:40 AM
Dr. Al Arian's biggest mistake was to trust the justice department when he agreed to plee guilty to that one charge, which had nothing to do with violence. Dr. Al Arian is a voice for the people of Palestine which our government wants to silence
by Earl
Apr 28, 2008 10:03 AM
We don't care so much if his human rights are violated, but next time it could be us. We have to be careful of allowing government to act as the judge and jury. It sets a precedent.
by Daniel
Apr 27, 2008 2:14 PM
In view of those cheap shots at the end,just exactly how are you different from the Justice Department? ... or Limbaugh and O'Reilly? "Liar": when, where, and about what? "Supporter of terrorism": he was found not guilty.
by Gino
Apr 25, 2008 12:45 PM
How many times does a court have to find this man not guilty. This case is more political than legal.
by Richard
Apr 24, 2008 5:42 PM
It's funny how many Americans forget the fact that a JURY found him innocent on many charges and deadlocked on others (meaning the gov couldn't prove the case) I'm beginning to wonder who the real terrorists are?? I say it
by Justice denied
Apr 24, 2008 1:09 PM
Just because someone pleads guilty to a reduced charge does not in fact make them guilty. Innocent people are caught up in the system everyday and urged by attorneys to plead out. It's expensive to fight for justice.
by connie
Apr 24, 2008 12:17 PM
This man is connected to terror & has his underlings doing the dirty work for him. He is dangerous. Lets reverse scenario for a moment. If this happened in his country, one w/be shot/hung immediately. What? HIS RIGHTS?The American way may not rig
by Ron
Apr 24, 2008 12:07 PM
The politicization of the justice department will eventually be regarded as one of the most egregious abuses of power by W. I pray for the return of the blindfold to the lady with the scales.
by jimmy
Apr 24, 2008 12:05 PM
The same editorial board that persists in heaping contempt on Richard Nixon after all these years, gets all warm & fuzzy with a terrorist who hates everything they stand for. Go figure.
by John
Apr 24, 2008 12:00 PM
Your assessment of Dr. Al-Arian is completely distorted. He stopped collaborating with the PIJ BEFORE it became violent, and he NEVER was involved in planning or enabling ANY acts of violence - as conceded by the chief prosecutor, Paul Pere
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.