The surrogate
It begins with a woman who yearns for a baby and another who is willing and able to give her one. You can imagine the motives of the prospective parents. But what about the woman willing to carry a baby, give birth and then walk away?
Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
Pinellas superintendent Clayton Wilcox takes umbrage at the notion he could be bought for a meal or theater ticket services, but his unusually close relationship with Scholastic Inc. speaks as much to loyalty as it does to ethics. When a superintendent tells a company with a failing product that he will "do what it takes to earn your confidence back," he needs to examine the signature at the bottom of his paycheck.
Unfortunately, as a pattern of his e-mails demonstrates, Wilcox was on the job market no later than 30 months into his tenure in Pinellas. His obsequious reply to a Scholastic executive came in the context of a heated public debate in 2006 in which School Board members complained about a reading program the district had purchased from the company. He went on to write: "I hope that I have not jeopardized our friendship or somehow damaged our relationship because of my lack of real leadership with my Board on this vitally important initiative."
Eight months later, in April 2007, Wilcox was discussing job titles and salaries with Scholastic.
Nothing in Wilcox's relationship with Scholastic or other companies suggests he was enriching himself or undermining the school district. He did, after all, bring to Pinellas schools a new era of openness and public transparency. But what he ignores by dismissing the significance of free meals and arranged Broadway tickets is that he was setting a standard for himself that would have been unacceptable for teachers.
District policy is clear that employees are not to accept anything of value from vendors who want to influence purchasing decisions. Is the superintendent above the rules?
Wilcox is headed off to his new job as a Scholastic vice president next month, and his tenacity for change will certainly be missed. He is aggravated with the Times for reporting on what he calls his "little bitty favor," and he is entitled to put things in broader context. But what his correspondence with Scholastic reveals, at a minimum, is his uncertain allegiances. He will serve as superintendent for four months shy of four years, but it appears he was intent on moving on much sooner than that.
[Last modified: May 20, 2008 04:18 PM]
Comments on this article
by tim
May 20, 2008 4:18 PM
If you whining teachers would take a 2% cut, that would be like firing Clayton Wilcox 160 times. Seems like that would make you all vicariously happy, collectively speaking of course.
by Neo
May 20, 2008 3:17 PM
Nothing shows he was enriching himself? How about his fat new job with Scholastic?
How blind can the Times editors be?
by sandra
May 19, 2008 1:56 PM
If Wilcox is such a "saint" why has morale taken a nose-dive under his brand of leadership? He's no saint. He's a masterful devil who put hard-working people in fear of losing their jobs while doing nothing to prepare for the current budget crisis.
by Deb
May 19, 2008 1:55 PM
Mary - Private planes??? Are you crazy? Can't let this one go - Readers - they flew regular airlines and the cheapest they could get.
by LL
May 19, 2008 1:55 PM
As one that had face to face meeting with Wilcox, believe me; he was a liar, a bully and an egotist! He had a great public persona, but never listened to teachers or professionals that were in the classroom and under fire daily! Good riddance!
by Lee
May 19, 2008 1:55 PM
Why can't editors just admit they were dead wrong about Wilcox? "Era of openness and public transparency?" Only to those who recognized the fraud from day one. The Times' editors are not included in that group.
by Cregg
May 18, 2008 2:02 PM
Why bother with "comments" when staffers filter and/oe delete anything meaningful that questions the reporter's focus, bias or agenda? Where can thoughtful conservatives find a decent, objective newspaper?
by jc
May 18, 2008 11:30 AM
This is just another example of a school board with no brains letting someone screw them over. Quit voting for these idiots.
by Cregg
May 18, 2008 11:28 AM
From this teacher's perspective, Wilcox came into the district with some much-needed, long-overdue specific objectives. He quickly learned, however, that school board members are not interested in holding firm to principles or to real accountability
by Dan
May 18, 2008 12:00 AM
I think he is a cookoo bird who got an excessive compensation package that rivaled the President of the United States.
by Shel
May 18, 2008 12:00 AM
If Wilcox is a saint, then I'm King of England. "Dr." Wilcox took your money and got himself a high-paying job with it. That was the plan all along. Realize that.
by tanner
May 18, 2008 12:00 AM
Wilcox is no saint he is a self serving, self absorbed individual who used bullying and intimidation on a daily basis. Anyone on the outside only saw his charming public persona, don't be fooled he was a good actor.
by Mary
May 17, 2008 11:59 PM
Check into which company plane was used to fly him and other board members to a celebration party for Jane when she became national school board president.
by bill
May 17, 2008 11:59 PM
Good riddance to Wilcox. He never hesitated to lie. Everybody knew that.He tried to tell the School Board who to hire as thier attorney and failed. What has he accomplished? Has the achievement gap closed at all? No. He should stick to selling suits.
by Debbie
May 17, 2008 11:59 PM
Clarification - your first article reports truth- he only requested assistance in purchasing the tickets, NOT PAYING FOR THE TICKETS. That cost was placed on his credit card - let it go or report it accurately. Yes- the real world will appreciate W
by Ben
May 17, 2008 11:58 PM
Do not blame him ; most of your employees are on the job hunt the day after they start !
by Kelly
May 17, 2008 3:53 PM
Controversial? Yes, he was. He did make changes that had meaning and no one can blame him for leaving, or blame Scholastic for hiring him. Welcome to AMERICA!
by Lauren
May 17, 2008 3:50 PM
Give it a rest! Wish Dr. Wilcox well. His time had come to move on and he did what anyone would do...explore his options. He landed a great job with an organization that has provided great things for our kids. Best wishes in your new endeavor Wilcox!
by tim
May 17, 2008 1:12 AM
Clayton Wilcox is a saint. More normal superintendants would have brougt a baseball bat to Board Meetings and thrown those idiots a beating or two. He's a saint. Leave him alone. You're just jealous the market pays him more than editorial writers.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.