The surrogate
It begins with a woman who yearns for a baby and another who is willing and able to give her one. You can imagine the motives of the prospective parents. But what about the woman willing to carry a baby, give birth and then walk away?
Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
Gov. Charlie Crist is being less than candid with Floridians in handling the state budget crisis. One day he quietly signs a terribly inadequate 2008-09 state budget that is almost $6-billion less than the one lawmakers approved a year ago and claims it meets the needs of the state. The next day he tells state agencies he will hold back an additional 4 percent because of slumping tax revenues, forcing more painful cuts before the new budget even takes effect July 1. While this approach may be prudent, it lacks transparency and prevents taxpayers from seeing the full ugly picture and expressing their views.
At least the Legislature had a full-throated public debate about the consequences of such deep spending cuts in a $66-billion budget they approved just six weeks ago. At least lawmakers made choices about which social services to cut and which to protect, minimizing cuts to public schools and scraping up enough money to keep the courts open. Now Crist is imposing across-the-board cuts that unfairly treat every program the same — and the budget year doesn't begin for more than three weeks.
A 4 percent holdback would not be so distasteful if it wasn't for the timing, coming just as deep spending reductions already are being made. It means universities that are freezing enrollments, eliminating positions and watching prized professors and administrators flee to other states have to cut even more. It means school boards that already are freezing teacher salaries and cutting assistant principals have to get their calculators out again. In Pinellas, it means that a new deal with the public defender, state attorney and judges to avoid bringing some misdemeanor cases to trial won't be enough to get by.
Don't be fooled by the Republican rhetoric that there are no other choices beyond cutting well past the fat and into the bone. Lawmakers also gave Crist the authority to tap into state reserves without the full Legislature's approval if the state starts running a deficit. And there are plenty of ways to raise revenue and create a fairer tax system, including closing sales tax exemptions, extending the sales tax to services, making it easier to collect sales taxes on catalog and Internet sales, and closing loopholes that enable corporations to avoid paying taxes here by accumulating profits elsewhere.
Unfortunately, all of those are nonstarters for Republicans who are content to starve higher education and other government services while waiting for property tax cuts to magically revive the economy. It's been nearly five months since Crist urged voters to pass Amendment 1. Anyone see any houses selling because Save Our Homes benefits are portable?
The gap between state revenue and recurring costs will continue to grow, and Florida cannot cut itself to prosperity. Even after cutting spending and taking hundreds of millions of dollars from reserves, the Legislature left no wiggle room in the 2008-09 budget. State economists released a new economic outlook statement Friday that shows the state will take in less general revenue than it plans to spend. It's making up the difference only through fees, reserves and budget gimmicks — and there is no room to absorb further revenue declines.
For the governor to require state agencies to hold back 4 percent of their spending so soon after the Legislature left town suggests lawmakers did not do their jobs well. It is their responsibility to write a balanced budget that meets the needs of the state, and they should come back to Tallahassee in a special session and do it right and in public.
They won't, of course. They would rather that Crist quietly keep cutting while they run for cover — and for re-election.
[Last modified: Jun 20, 2008 04:13 PM]
Comments on this article
by Jose
Jun 20, 2008 4:13 PM
The real purpose is to enrich the (GOP) rich.
by Harold
Jun 19, 2008 9:47 AM
Whomever wrote the editorial should get real. Every person has to cut living expenses as food, fuel, medicine, etc. get higher. Why should not the governments be required to do the same? Individuals and families have to decide what is most important and what they can afford and live accordingly. I have to agree a Florida income tax is needed and owner occupied homes should be removed from being taxed. One never owns their home because of taxes.
by sick of Republicans
Jun 16, 2008 1:45 PM
I have seen far more waste in the private sector than in the state agency I work for now. Folks, the services you expect and rely upon cost money and when there is no money to pay for them, please don't complain to me.
by NOMO taxes
Jun 16, 2008 11:27 AM
"plenty of ways to raise revenue: closing sales tax exemptions, extending the sales tax to services..." NEWSFLASH! We all still pay! These are not new revenue sources, it'll be you and me paying the tab. Either way, tax = burden on the economy.
by Deb
Jun 16, 2008 11:27 AM
State cut taxes...making it now the responsibility of cities & counties to raise them in order to provide minimum services. Watch & wake up! Still Republican but not HAPPY at all.
by Deb
Jun 16, 2008 11:27 AM
Being a Republican, all I can say is that I am ashamed of how the past and present leadership have treated PUBLIC education.Cutting the "fat" is one thing, cutting teachers and critical support is another.Public eduation attempts to meet needs of ALL
by Larry
Jun 16, 2008 11:27 AM
Asking what effect 'portability' has had after only 5 months is a cheap shot at it's worst- no one has even received a Tax Bill yet and won't til' November- what effect could it possibly have had? No one should be taxed out of thier homes! Period
by Richard
Jun 16, 2008 11:27 AM
Perhaps we should encourage drilling off the Florida coast. Royalties would be a new source of revenue to finance State Gov't programs without resorting to tax increases.
by grady
Jun 16, 2008 11:27 AM
the times would assure gov. employees generous pensions regardless of the public condition. During bad times we all suffer, not just the gov.
by Ronnie
Jun 16, 2008 11:27 AM
You need to cut spending in bad economic times. We pay these taxes and at this time we cannot afford them. All of us have had to make adjustments to make the ends meet. So should our government. The Times is wrong, but then again you have always been for more taxes.
by JT
Jun 16, 2008 11:17 AM
I have not heard of anyone not participating in a transaction because of Amendment 1. Give it time. Also, don't MVP Professors typically enjoy endowed chair positions etc. Govt scope needs to shrink or across the board cuts will become the norm.
by Mike
Jun 16, 2008 10:58 AM
We need to cut the federal income tax to 5% and install a 10-12% state income tax. It costs a fortune in beaurocracy to send our money to D.C., have them pass it around and dole some out back to us. Either do that or build a really expensive stadium.
by bill
Jun 16, 2008 10:46 AM
That's the only FAIR way to make cuts. Stop spending money on things that make us look good to others. Spend money on NEEDS instead of DESIRES. When the people prosper, the government receives revenues they need.
by Frank
Jun 15, 2008 8:39 AM
To support a tax built stadium while whining about spending cuts is hypocritical. Stop wasting our money on crap from trees in medians to buildings built to impress. Wise use of resources comes first.
by Martin
Jun 15, 2008 8:39 AM
The private sector has to cut so why should government not have to also. The school systems should be privatize and the cost per student will go down and the quality of education will go up.
Government is to large and needs to be down sized.
by Tom
Jun 15, 2008 8:39 AM
Great! Smaller government. We need to do more than cut, but eliminate entire programs. Whar are these so called "needs of the state"?
by An Observer
Jun 14, 2008 10:32 PM
FACT: Republicans don't like government.
OBSERVATION: Republicans are screwing things up all over the place.
THEORY: Republicans intentionally screw things up so the public also doesn't like government, thus voting for Republicans.
by Stuart
Jun 14, 2008 10:32 PM
Republicans don't want to improve government, they want to destroy it. Then they would contract out government services to private companies, who would then contribute money to Republican campaigns in order to keep their contracts.
by jimmy
Jun 14, 2008 10:32 PM
Across the board cuts were the only way to go. That this is also an election year simply underlined the necessity. Times editors would prefer to make this about debates, committees, hearings, lawyers (and more lawyers) and politics, of course.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.