Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code
A Times Editorial

Crist's bold step toward restoring the Everglades


In print: Wednesday, June 25, 2008


South Florida Water Management District
South Florida Water Management District
Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

Gov. Charlie Crist has changed the game in the Florida Everglades. If his deal to buy out U.S. Sugar Corp. comes to fruition, he will have provided a 292-square-mile cleansing link to the River of Grass and leapfrogged decades of arduous restoration work. The deal, hatched in secret negotiations over the past eight months, already has produced some unimaginable alliances. Everglades crusader Mary Barley was left breathless: "A restored and sustained Everglades is no longer a dream." U.S. Sugar president Robert Buker, long her archenemy, called the deal "a paradigm shift for the Everglades and the environment in Florida, one that would have been inconceivable in the past."

Buker is right, and Crist appointees on the South Florida Water Management District may have paved the way last fall when they agreed, finally, to end the pumping of dirty water from sugar farms back north into Lake Okeechobee. The action infuriated U.S. Sugar lobbyists. Crist then hit them with the idea of selling out, in this case to the public, and negotiations began.

The deal is by no means done. The state and the company have agreed only in concept, and the $1.75-billion price tag needs to be subjected to some intense scrutiny by respected appraisers. The water district claims it can afford the purchase itself by borrowing the money and paying it off by annually redirecting $117-million of existing property tax proceeds. That would mean no general tax dollars for the purchase would come from the state, although taxpayers have been subsidizing the sugar industry for years through unnecessary federal price supports that keep domestic sugar prices far above those on the world market.

If the district is able to afford the purchase alone, then its financial leadership cannot be lost on the Legislature or Congress. Neither has kept its fiscal promises toward Everglades restoration, and a land purchase on this scale should only make the job easier. The current plan calls for aquifer storage wells to apportion water to the Everglades, which is untested and costly. The new land would provide a more natural filter.

If Crist pulls off this land purchase, then members of the Florida congressional delegation and the presidential candidates will need to pay closer attention. Congress surely can come up with the money to keep the restoration program going.

Crist's plan would allow U.S. Sugar to keep farming for six years, which is a reasonable transition period that should also give the state time to help cushion the economic impact to the 1,700 workers and the town of Clewiston. In this case, the state's gain may come at some expense to the town, and the town deserves some consideration.

Environmental groups are still stunned by the news. The sugar farms that border the lake interrupt what used to constitute a natural flow of water southward, making their polluted water an interminable migraine for the Everglades. To remove farming from nearly half that land in one single purchase, then, is to open a gateway that might replenish the Everglades. Crist called it "the critical missing link," and he may some day be proven right.



[Last modified: Jun 26, 2008 07:06 PM]



Comments on this article
by Ted Jun 26, 2008 7:06 PM
Great for the environment ; a county is now out of business , Hendry Co. .In the mean time , the economy , education ,healthcare ,taxes ,crime , poverty , kidcare ,bridges ,roads ,economic stimulation are still there to be dealt with . Who pays ?
by Don Jun 25, 2008 6:14 PM
I'm tentatively in favor of this. I would like to see some more reports on both economic and environmental impact of this change but so far it sounds like it is going to be a net positive.
by Carol Jun 25, 2008 5:18 PM
This is amazing. As a 3rd generation Floridian I am excited at the possiblity of this issue resolved at last and restoring the Everglades to it's natural state.
by Jack fry Jun 25, 2008 4:16 PM
What a big sellout and the taxpayers get the shaft!
by Nate Jun 25, 2008 1:51 PM
How much would have U.S. Sugar had to put out if the restoration started. And the environmntal monitoring started. Only to find out their land would cost billions to remediate? They sold out to make a profit now, rather than pay fees later.
by Allison Jun 25, 2008 1:17 PM
Fantastic,creative,pure genious solution.
by Sam P Jun 25, 2008 11:06 AM
I was thinking that if it were like a $17.7 trillion then we could buy out all of Florida and get it back to where only Native Americans lived in Florida. "FOLLOW THE MONEY ON THIS ONE" . Who profits and who pays for it.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT