Testing Grounds The latest industry being outsourced to India is clinical drug trials. And any number of tragic things can happen on the way to your medicine cabinet.
Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
It might be the very definition of a sucker. Here we are spending billions of dollars we don't have toward Iraq's reconstruction, while the Iraqi government is sitting on tens of billions of dollars in surpluses. Oil's been very good to Iraq, and it's only destined to get better. Why then are Iraq's oil billions piling up in the Federal Reserve Bank in New York, earning interest, while America has gone into debt to provide Iraqis with electricity and water?
There is no good answer to that question beyond the fact that we're getting rooked.
According to a study by the Government Accountability Office, Iraq now enjoys a cumulative budget surplus of $79-billion; meanwhile the American taxpayer has expended $48-billion toward reconstruction projects in the war-torn nation.
While Congress keeps writing checks to Iraq, the oil-rich nation has spent a relative pittance on its own reconstruction. From 2005 through April 2008, Iraq spent a measly $3.9-billion on things like providing Iraqis with electricity and water, while the United States has put out $23.2-billion for the same services since the start of the war in 2003.
So much of Iraq's surplus is deposited at the Federal Reserve Bank in New York that the United States has paid out more than $435-million in interest.
This lopsided situation looks even more ridiculous when one juxtaposes Iraq rolling in oil dough with Americans suffering every time they roll into a gas station.
This has to stop. Early on, the Bush administration promised that Iraq would be able to use its oil revenues to largely pay for its own reconstruction. Well, it seems that this one prediction may turn out to have some validity. But until the administration cuts off the money spigot, Iraq's ministers have no incentive to start spending down their country's healthy reserves.
Iraq is still an unsafe country with staggering infrastructure needs. And while the United States bears most of responsibility for Iraq's current state, it's time to start sharing the financial burden. Iraq now has the capacity to begin addressing the nation's development needs and it should be devoting its massive oil wealth to that purpose. American taxpayers have already spent more — much more — than they can afford.
[Last modified: Aug 14, 2008 04:52 PM]
Comments on this article
by Tee
Aug 14, 2008 4:52 PM
Sure, Jimmy...try to blame the Democrats and Clinton like you whiny Republicans always do. Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and Jesus saw the weapons of mass-destruction TOO. They were there, REALLY they were. Wasn't it Bin Laden we needed to chase?????
by Veep
Aug 11, 2008 12:13 PM
We can thank the bomb happy republicans for this mess. We haven't even rebuilt New Orleans yet and we are worried about helping Iraq? Down with the Republicans and the radical conservative right. Vote Obama
by jimmy
Aug 11, 2008 12:13 PM
Just read the comments of my fellow readers to get the full flavor of Democratic Party talking points about Bush and the Iraq war. For TEN YEARS our troops served in the Balkans under Pres. Clinton after he promised they'd be out in 6 mos.
by Monte
Aug 11, 2008 12:13 PM
Why does Iraq have to be reconstructed? Maybe because we destroyed it with Bush's neocon adventure in foreign affairs. Quite whining, and pay for Bush's stuidity.
by jimm
Aug 11, 2008 12:13 PM
This is such BS!!! Everybody knows that the big story this weekend--apart from Russia invading their neighbor--is the Edwards story. The Times has unheroically avoided the Edwards story to avoid pissing off their radical Left readership.
by billy
Aug 11, 2008 12:13 PM
this whole iraq catastrophe was brought to us by a vile sick twisted band of neo-con trash. mcbush promises more of this crap. too many decent americans have lost their lives or have been horribly maimed due to all the lies from bush/cheney.
by Gary
Aug 11, 2008 12:13 PM
But I though that Bush and Cheney said the reconstruction of the country would be paid with their oil revenues?
They wouldn't have lied would they?
by mike vick
Aug 11, 2008 12:13 PM
Pay for what? Attacking their nation and destroying the Iraq people way of
life. Which was very good under Hussien. The Iraq people say thank you!
by george
Aug 10, 2008 12:29 PM
Excuse me, but wasn't it the U.S. and a few cohorts that destroyed Iraq? The occupation forces stood by idly while all the national treasures of Iraq (exepting the Oil Ministry) were looted and infrastructure destroyed. Hey,it's pay up/shut up time.
by Tom D
Aug 10, 2008 12:26 PM
It's time for the Iraqis' to pay for the war that we were told all but for a 100 million their oil profits would pay for ! Tally up the bill and submit it so our Vet Assoc. can use that money for their healtcare.
by Sally
Aug 10, 2008 12:20 PM
The United States broke Iraq through ten years of sanctions. Then we destroyed its infrastructure, murdered hundreds of thousands of its citizens and caused millions to become refugees-and that country should pay for the mess we made?
by Bill
Aug 10, 2008 10:11 AM
Maybe we should sue the government of Iraq for all our war dead. They are letting us foot their bills, so why not make them pay for the death and destruction they have caused by being lazy
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.