Friday, May 25, 2018
Editorials

Editorial: House flood bill needs work

After months of stonewalling on flood insurance, the U.S. House's bipartisan approval this week of legislation aimed at addressing soaring premiums offers relief for some property owners. But the House bill is dramatically different from the approach the U.S. Senate approved and risks repeating some of the mistakes of the 2012 law that caused this mess. The Senate should thoroughly examine the House's approach and ensure it is not just the most convenient political solution to a public policy problem.

The House bill approved Tuesday night is a study in political compromise. House Republican leaders were unwilling for months to consider a bipartisan Senate plan supported by the majority of House members. The Senate bill would delay implementation of the 2012 Biggert-Waters Act for homeowners for up to four years to create time for more study of the entire program. Instead, House Republican leaders insisted that any response to soaring premiums still address the flood insurance program's $24 billion debt after Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy.

But two years after Congress made a big mistake passing Biggert-Waters without understanding the consequences, it's still not clear the flood insurance program has the tools it needs to establish fair or affordable rates. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has yet to convincingly explain how its new rates are sometimes 10 times higher or amount to a significant percentage of the home's net worth — particularly when the Government Accountability Office has noted it doesn't have elevation levels for individual properties. News reports have detailed cost-cutting in flood map drawing and how wealthy waterfront property owners have successfully won lower premiums through map challenges, while their neighbors still face higher rates. That's fine for the wealthy owners, but it's unfair to everyone else who does not have the time or money to challenge the maps.

The House bill would repeal the Biggert-Waters provision that would end premium subsidies for those properties placed in higher risk flood zones by updated flood maps. But FEMA cannot even tell Congress how many of those "grandfathered" policies exist.

On the plus side, under the House plan, new buyers of properties built before flood insurance maps existed no longer would have to immediately pay actuarially sound rates. That has stalled sales on older homes in some neighborhoods and threatened the value of the biggest asset for many families and businesses. The House also would limit rate increases for those same owners from an average of 20 percent annually until they reached actuarially sound rates to 15 percent. No individual policyholder would pay more than 18 percent more a year. Business and second home owners, however, would still pay an average of 25 percent more.

The House bill has some cursory plans for beefing up consumer protections, improving communications when federal flood maps are redrawn and attempts to address affordability. And it is better than the status quo. But unlike the Senate bill, it doesn't acknowledge that significant questions remain about the flood insurance operation. Two years ago, Congress passed Biggert-Waters without doing its homework. It's at risk of repeating the same mistake if the Senate just rubber-stamps the House plan.

Comments
Editorial: Welcome Bayshore changes still can’t stop bad judgment

Editorial: Welcome Bayshore changes still can’t stop bad judgment

It’s human nature in following any tragedy to imagine: How could this have been prevented? On that score, the city of Tampa responded appropriately to the deaths this week of a mother and her toddler whom police say were hit by a teenage driver racin...
Updated: 1 hour ago
Editorial: Filling Rocky Point lagoon to build townhomes is an empty-headed idea

Editorial: Filling Rocky Point lagoon to build townhomes is an empty-headed idea

One of the worst ideas in a long time in the field of urban planning received a blessing this month when the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission approved a land-use change for a project that calls for filling three acres of water insi...
Published: 05/25/18
Editorial: Searching for the real Adam Putnam

Editorial: Searching for the real Adam Putnam

Send out an Amber Alert for Adam Putnam. The red-haired, affable fellow who has served capably as a state legislator, member of Congress and agriculture commissioner is missing. In his place is a far-right caricature who has branded himself as a prou...
Updated: 6 hours ago
Editorial: A strong economic case for restoring voting rights for felons

Editorial: A strong economic case for restoring voting rights for felons

Floridians are paying a steep price for a system that makes it as difficult as possible for people who leave prison to reintegrate into civic life. Gov. Rick Scott’s clemency process isn’t just archaic and cruel — it also wastes enormous public resou...
Updated: 9 hours ago
Editorial: Trump right to cancel North Korea talks on nuclear weapons

Editorial: Trump right to cancel North Korea talks on nuclear weapons

Regardless of the reason, the cancellation of the U.S.-North Korea summit to address Pyonyang’s nuclear program is hardly the worst possible outcome of this high-stakes diplomatic gamble. President Donald Trump was unprepared, North Korea’s Kim Jong ...
Published: 05/24/18
Updated: 05/25/18

NFL kneels before the altar of profits

The owners of the 32 National Football League teams sent a wrongheaded and, frankly, un-American message to their players Wednesday: Expressing your opinion during the national anthem is no longer permitted."A club will be fined by the League if its ...
Published: 05/24/18

Editorial: A positive first step in ensuring student access at USFSP

As a task force sorts out countless details involved in folding the University of South Florida St. Petersburg back into the major research university based in Tampa, ensuring access for good Pinellas students remains a concern. An enhanced cooperati...
Updated: 9 hours ago
Editorial: Banks still need watching after easing Dodd-Frank rules

Editorial: Banks still need watching after easing Dodd-Frank rules

Legislation that waters down the 2010 Dodd-Frank law and was sent to President Donald Trump this week is a mixed bag at best. Some provisions recognize that Congress may have gone too far in some areas in the wake of the Great Recession to place new ...
Published: 05/23/18
Updated: 05/24/18
Editorial: Honoring our fallen soldiers on Memorial Day

Editorial: Honoring our fallen soldiers on Memorial Day

The rising tensions with Iran, the resurgence of violence in the Mideast and the uncertainty over a nuclear disarmament deal with North Korea combine to create an unsettling time this Memorial Day. These grave threats to peace are another reminder of...
Updated: 6 hours ago

Another voice: The chutzpah of these men

A new phase of the #MeToo movement may be upon us. Call it the "not so fast" era: Powerful men who plotted career comebacks mere months after being taken down by accusations of sexual misconduct now face even more alarming claims.Mario Batali, the ce...
Published: 05/22/18
Updated: 05/23/18