Friday, April 20, 2018
Editorials

On ballot, a supreme attempt to intimidate

The least understood portion of the November ballot may be the section asking voters whether three Florida Supreme Court justices and other appellate judges should keep their jobs. The justices, the Florida Bar and other groups are embarking on public education campaigns, and with good reason. The merit retention system is designed to preserve the judiciary branch's independence and protect it from corruption and political influence, and the Republican Party of Florida and a conservative interest group unhappy with the Supreme Court's opinions are trying to pierce those protections.

Justices R. Fred Lewis, Barbara J. Pariente and Peggy A. Quince are not running against each other. Their names do not appear on the ballot because they have done anything wrong. And the merit retention process is not a referendum on whether voters agree with the court's opinions. Merit retention provides an opportunity for voters to review whether the justices act professionally, independently and impartially in applying the law.

Yet the campaign by the misnamed Restore Justice 2012 group seeks to oust the justices because it disagrees with some of the court's opinions. The state Republican Party injected unprecedented political pressure into the mix late Friday by announcing that it opposes the retention of the three justices. This is just the latest in a growing special-interest movement nationwide aimed at intimidating the courts. Until now, much of the effort has centered in states where judges are directly elected to appellate courts — a system Florida wisely reformed in 1976 after an extraordinary, politically influenced scandal at the state Supreme Court.

In Florida, justices to the Supreme Court and judges to the appellate courts are appointed by the governor. New justices face a first merit retention vote in the first general election that occurs more than one year after their appointment, and then every six years after that. They are retained by a majority vote, and no Florida appellate judge or justice has lost their post through merit retention.

There is a logical reason for that streak. Justices and appellate judges are heavily vetted by a committee of informed citizens that nominate finalists to the governor. And judges who are ethically compromised are frequently disciplined or resign from the bench, as was the case in Tallahassee last year when Paul Hawkes, the mastermind behind the lavish 1st District Court of Appeal building nicknamed the Taj Mahal, resigned rather than face an ethics trial.

In Florida, the anti-justices group is citing 10 of the thousands of cases Lewis, Pariente and Quince have overseen, producing an oversimplified "report card" that gives no details. For example, it cites the 5-2 opinion in which the justices were part of the majority that struck from the 2010 ballot largely symbolic opposition to the Affordable Care Act. The majority concluded that the ballot language was misleading. Ironically, the state's own attorneys all but concurred by offering substitute ballot language during the case. But the court — in a decidedly nonactivist posture — said it didn't have the authority to replace the language; only the Legislature did. So last year, lawmakers returned and tweaked the language, and voters will see it on the Nov. 6 ballot as Amendment 1.

Whether voters agree or disagree with the Florida Supreme Court's opinion in that case or any other case is not what merit retention is about, regardless of any special-interest group's effort to corrupt the process. States such as Iowa have seen their supreme court justices thrown out by voters because of the unpopularity of a legal decision. Floridians should not fall for such an attempt to intimidate the state's highest court and compromise its independence.

Comments
Editorial: New Cuba president is chance for new start

Editorial: New Cuba president is chance for new start

For all the symbolism, Raul Castro’s handoff of the Cuban presidency this week amounts to less than meets the eye even if his handpicked successor, the Communist Party functionary Miguel Diaz-Canel Bermudez, is the first person not named Castro to le...
Updated: 9 hours ago

Editorial: A missed chance for open primary elections

The Florida Constitution Revision Commission did a lot of things wrong this week by combining unrelated or unpalatable provisions into single amendments that will appear on the November ballot. It also wasted an opportunity to do one thing right. The...
Updated: 9 hours ago
Editorial: When they visit Nature’s Classroom, kids are right where they belong

Editorial: When they visit Nature’s Classroom, kids are right where they belong

The Hillsborough school district planted a fruitful seed with the opening of Nature’s Classroom five decades ago on the cypress-lined banks of the Hillsborough River northeast of Tampa. • The lessons taught there to some 17,000 sixth graders each yea...
Published: 04/20/18

Editorial: Equality pays off on Southwest Flight 1380

The passengers of Southwest Flight 1380 can be thankful that, 33 years ago, the U.S. Navy took the lead on equal opportunity.Capt. Tammie Jo Shults was piloting the flight from New York to Dallas on Tuesday when an engine exploded, blowing out a wind...
Updated: 9 hours ago
Editorial: Why single-member districts would be bad for Hillsborough commission

Editorial: Why single-member districts would be bad for Hillsborough commission

Anyone looking to make Hillsborough County government bigger, costlier, more dysfunctional and less of a regional force should love the idea that Commissioner Sandy Murman rolled out this week. She proposes enlarging the seven-member board to nine, e...
Published: 04/19/18
Updated: 04/20/18
Editorial: Improving foster care in Hillsborough

Editorial: Improving foster care in Hillsborough

A new foster care provider in Hillsborough County is poised to take over operations in May, only months after its predecessor was fired for what was alleged to be a pattern of failing to supervise at-risk children in its care. Many of the case manage...
Published: 04/18/18

Another voice: Back to postal reform

President Donald Trump is angry at Amazon for, in his tweeted words, "costing the United States Post Office massive amounts of money for being their Delivery Boy." Yet in more recent days, Trump has at least channeled his feelings in what could prove...
Published: 04/17/18
Updated: 04/18/18
Editorial: Congress should protect independence of special counsel

Editorial: Congress should protect independence of special counsel

A bipartisan Senate bill clarifying that only the attorney general or a high-ranking designee could remove a special prosecutor would send an important message amid President Donald Trump’s attacks on the investigation into Russia’s inter...
Published: 04/16/18
Updated: 04/17/18
Editorial: Don’t fall for Constitution Revision Commission’s tricks

Editorial: Don’t fall for Constitution Revision Commission’s tricks

The Florida Constitution Revision Commission has wasted months as a politically motivated scam masquerading as a high-minded effort to ask voters to improve the state’s fundamental document. The commission on Monday added amendments to the Nove...
Published: 04/16/18
Editorial: Redner’s court win on medical marijuana sends message

Editorial: Redner’s court win on medical marijuana sends message

Florida regulators have done far too little to make voter-approved medical marijuana widely available for patients suffering from chronic illnesses. A circuit court judge in Tallahassee ruled last week there is a price for that obstruction, finding t...
Published: 04/15/18
Updated: 04/16/18