Saturday, January 20, 2018
Letters To The Editor

Letters: Clearwater Marine Aquarium wants chance to excel

A new Clearwater Marine Aquarium for downtown Clearwater

Aquarium wants chance to excel

On Nov. 5, the citizens of Clearwater will be voting to make a very important decision that could materially affect downtown Clearwater and our local economy.

A "no" vote means everything remains status quo, nothing changes.

A "yes" vote will provide the city and Clearwater Marine Aquarium (CMA) with an opportunity for a new downtown aquarium and stimulate expansion of business in the downtown core. It could also create family-oriented activities that may guide the way to a renewed and vibrant downtown.

A few years ago, negative thinking could have sunk a struggling CMA, which in 2006 had 78,000 visitors for the entire year. Instead, we were determined to find a way to not only survive, but flourish.

We put together a business plan and grew attendance by 30 percent a year, even before the movie Dolphin Tale. Winter the dolphin came to us barely hanging on to her life. Our animal care team could have given up on her but didn't. And she survived.

When a possible book deal was being discussed, some said it would never happen (there have been four books written about Winter and two more are in the works).

When talk of a possible movie surfaced, many said it was a pipe dream. Four years later, Dolphin Tale was released and now the sequel, Dolphin Tale 2, is being filmed. Currently, there are discussions with Alcon Entertainment about a possible TV series following the sequel.

Last year, we packed 750,000 guests into an aging, more than 50-year-old, 53,000-square-foot former sewer plant (Florida Aquarium had 200,000 square feet with 600,000 visitors in 2012). That was also a challenge, but our team did it with positive and creative thinking!

Opponents say CMA's project is risky and the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the city and aquarium is non-binding. But the City Council can't enter into a binding agreement until voters approve the use of the land and authorize the council to negotiate a lease with CMA.

The funds must be in place to build the aquarium by 2016 or the project is canceled. Creditors would have no recourse to taxpayers if CMA were to default.

A "yes" vote for the referendum merely authorizes the change of use for the land — only the land identified in the referendum — and authorizes the City Council to negotiate the final terms of the MOU in the best interest of the city. The MOU is nothing more than a letter of intent where, if major changes occur while hammering out details, either side has the opportunity to back out of the agreement.

There are many other hurdles to overcome. CMA is asking voters to give us a chance to try and raise the money to provide another opportunity to bring value to the community.

We have overcome much in the past and will succeed in the future with a positive outlook and perseverance. Please vote on Nov. 5.

Frank Dame, chief operating officer, Clearwater Marine Aquarium

Require details on aquarium plan

Our City Charter is the highest law of the city of Clearwater, just as our Constitution is the highest law of the country.

To change our City Charter, under normal circumstances, our city will appoint a group of citizens within every five years to review the charter. They will discuss any suggestions from the City Council or public that might require the charter to be amended, changed or altered by exception — such as the one being asked by the Clearwater Marine Aquarium.

The suggestions are then forwarded to the council for public review and discussion. An ordinance is then prepared by staff, reviewed at public hearings and voted upon to go to referendum if necessary.

I served on the last two Clearwater charter review committees, which were made up of a large, diverse group of Clearwater citizens chosen by the council. The process works very well. Additionally, although rarely, the council may circumvent the committee process and bring changes forward directly by ordinance, which is reviewed by the public and then goes to referendum.

In 1982, the Clearwater City Charter was dramatically changed. Voters decided that the downtown waterfront public properties from Drew Street to Chestnut Street were so special that they should be protected by specific restrictions placed in the charter. This would ensure that the public had ample opportunity to review any developments or plans for these properties.

Normally when we change, amend or alter laws in the city, it is accepted practice to review the changes, get staff comments and then proceed to public hearings, where pertinent documents are dissected by the council, experts and the public. The charter, which is the highest law of the city, should be treated with the same respect.

So now we find ourselves in a peculiar position. We understand that the council is asking us to change the charter to allow the aquarium to lease for 60 years certain public properties on the downtown waterfront. We understand generally what they want to do, but all the specifics for staff, council and public review will come after we change the charter.

There is no need to rush to referendum for this to happen. Shouldn't we change the charter after all the plans, documents and details are reviewed by staff, council, Charter Review Committee and at public hearings?

Howard Warshauer, Clearwater


Sunday’s letters: Bay area shortchanged on foster care funds

Opioid crisis herds kids to foster care | Jan. 9Bay area foster care shortchangedAs mentioned in this article, the growing opioid epidemic is unfortunately bringing more children into the Florida foster care system. While substance abuse has hist...
Published: 01/20/18

Saturday’s letters: It’s not the word, it’s the racism

Presidential precedent | Jan. 14It’s not the word; it’s the racismThe Times went in the wrong direction and printed information that is rather useless. And that is strange. You usually get it right.I am talking about President Donald Trump’s prof...
Published: 01/19/18

Friday’s letters: Help for boaters against modern-day ‘pirates’

Marine towing and salvageHelp against modern-day piracyAs an avid recreational boat owner and sixth-generation Floridian, I know there’s no better way to enjoy our state’s spectacular waters than taking your boat out. Unfortunately, the fun of boatin...
Published: 01/17/18
Updated: 01/18/18

Thursday’s letters: All Americans need health care

Doctor: Trump got perfect score on cognitive test | Jan. 17All Americans need health carePresident Donald Trump’s extensive health exam has apparently declared him physically fit for office. As I was reading about the battery of tests he received...
Published: 01/17/18

Wednesday’s letters: St. Petersburg’s culture, vibrancy impresses

St. PetersburgImpressive culture and vibrancyI recently visited Tampa Bay and celebrated New Year’s weekend in downtown St. Petersburg. I was awestruck by what I encountered and experienced. It has been several years since I last visited, and the tra...
Published: 01/16/18

Pasco Letters to the Editor for Jan. 19

Re: Walking leads to shocking catalogue of trash | Jan. 12 column Bring back anti-littering campaignJust came back from the beautiful, clean city of Singapore, where there is a $1,000 fine, plus community service for littering. I think a presiden...
Published: 01/16/18
Tuesday’s letters: Trump’s accomplishments unheralded

Tuesday’s letters: Trump’s accomplishments unheralded

President Donald TrumpAchievements go unrecognizedAre Americans even aware that our economy is healthier and growing much faster, that ISIS has been defeated and lost their territory, that China and other countries are buying more American goods and ...
Published: 01/16/18

Monday’s letters: Don’t be fooled by drilling turnaround

Deal blocks drilling off Fla. | Jan. 10Don’t be fooled by turnaroundWhile I am very grateful that Florida has been taken off the table regarding offshore oil drilling, it is clear this is a political move to champion Gov. Rick Scott as he conside...
Published: 01/14/18

Sunday’s letters: Left wing late to the #MeToo cause

#MeTooDemocrats come late to the causeThe Times devoted an entire page to the #MeToo issues on Sunday. The ironies here for longtime observers are nearly boundless. Twenty years ago, folks like myself were called "prudes" and worse because we found P...
Published: 01/13/18

Saturday’s letters: A wall of towers isn’t progress

Skyline takes shape | Jan. 7A wall of towers isn’t progressFirst of all, once the 17 projects currently under way are completed, there will be no "skyline." There will be a wall of buildings blotting out the sun and sky. St. Petersburg has become...
Published: 01/12/18