Detours: a country in search of direction
On the eve of the election, a reporter and photographer set out for Washington, via America. We tell stories from seven towns, touching on seven issues from politics and real life.
Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
Game show themes
These themes are probably going to make some of you have flashbacks to wasted mornings or afternoons spent sprawled in front of the TV.
By
John Romano, Times Sports Columnist
In print: Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Rays rookie third baseman Evan Longoria signs autographs for fans at the Disney complex, where the team is hoping to build up a fan base after a decade of attendance struggles.
You may have noticed the Tampa Bay Rays played a regular-season game near Orlando on Tuesday night. Then again, considering Tropicana Field looked only a little less empty than on a typical game night, maybe you didn't notice at all.
For a second year in a row, the Rays have moved a regular-season series to a spring training stadium at the Disney Wide World of Sports complex. The stated reason, by ownership, is to broaden their fan base. The unspoken part of that explanation is the owners are not happy with their local fan base.
And, if we're going to be honest about it, they have a point.
Attendance for Rays games this season has been a disappointment. Maybe even a major disappointment.
For years, we have cried about the penny-pinching ways of ownership groups past and present. This was the reason, we said, the Rays were always in last place. And that was the reason, we claimed, fans were reluctant to come to the park.
So, this season, ownership increased its payroll by 81.7 percent. It increased hope exponentially. And, through the first 11 home games, attendance is up 3.4 percent.
Somewhere, there is a disconnect.
Now I am not chastising anyone for not going to a ballgame. That is not my place and, frankly, it would be hypocritical. I tend to spend my entertainment dollars on concerts, plays and never-ending afternoons at Chuck E. Cheese. Other people have their interests.
The point I'm trying to make is Tampa Bay, as a sports market, is not all that impressive. We have a hockey team that has been sold more often than a '74 Pinto. And for a historic series of NCAA Tournament basketball games last month, the St. Pete Times Forum looked half-empty to the rest of the nation.
Yet none of that compares to the decade-long blind date the Rays and their fans have been on.
Now I understand there are plenty of reasons why Tropicana Field is routinely three-quarters empty. Combine a last-place team with an unattractive stadium in a poor location, and you can pretty much pick your box seat most nights. Throw in the scout-, newspaper-, police-, partner- and raccoon-hating high jinks of the previous owner, and you have the makings of a historic run of bad crowds.
And, folks, that's where we are today.
The Rays have been last in the American League in attendance for the past seven seasons. Since 1947, only three other franchises (St. Louis Browns, Washington Senators, Montreal Expos) have been last in their league for seven consecutive seasons.
None made it to eight. That's because they all had moved to new cities by then.
So it should come as no surprise that the Rays are trying to boost attendance by looking 100 miles down the road. It should come as no surprise that they are seeking a new stadium to boost revenue streams.
And, if the stadium does not get built, it should come as no surprise when the Rays begin listening to offers from other communities, including Tampa.
If you don't think other cities haven't already contacted the Rays, you are mistaken. Officials in Charlotte, Mexico City, Portland, Ore., and San Antonio, Texas, follow the news. They know the attendance figures.
Just as Rick Dodge once did for St. Petersburg, there is some community representative in those places in charge of developing a relationship with the owners of struggling franchises. Right now, the Rays and Marlins are the obvious targets for those baseball-sniffing locales.
Of course, talk of a move is premature. The stadium issue has not been resolved, and the Rays lease would make a move financially cumbersome. Also, none of the cities available is a can't-miss market.
So I'm not bringing it up as a scare tactic. I'm also not trying to convince anyone a stadium needs to be built. Government officials and, perhaps, St. Petersburg voters will make that decision.
All I'm doing is pointing out the reality of the situation.
Look at teams that were routinely near the bottom of major-league baseball attendance in the 1980s and '90s. Cleveland, Seattle, San Diego, Minnesota, Detroit, Houston, Milwaukee, Pittsburgh. They all eventually had new stadiums built.
And the team that struggled the most — the Montreal Expos — had MLB's blessing to move to Washington.
In the end, I'm not trying to blame the average Tampa Bay fan.
This mess is simply a case of critical mass. Of a market rich in numbers but not in corporate dollars. Of a population with allegiances around the country, but with shallow roots here. Of a stadium that is entirely functional, but not at all enticing. Of a franchise that once tried cornering the market on stupid decisions.
There are plenty of reasonable explanations why the Rays have been at the bottom of the league in attendance since 2001.
But if the team continues to grow on the field without an accompanying bump at the box office, those explanations are not going to sound reasonable much longer.
There is, after all, a certain prestige that comes with being a big-league city.
There is also a high cost.
John Romano can be reached at romano@sptimes.com.
[Last modified: Apr 24, 2008 12:01 PM]
Comments on this article
by Shocked
Apr 23, 2008 11:09 AM
I was actually impressed with Romano for the first time ever when talking about the Rays. He has very valid points even if they may not be the whole case. Quit making excuses why not to go. They are exciting to watch despite their issues.
by Woody
Apr 23, 2008 11:09 AM
Well said, J. Romano. This area is great at making excuses why they don't go to games. These whiny area residents need to support the local team or there won't be a team to host your old "local" team. Fly to Atl or drive to Miami
by Aaron
Apr 23, 2008 11:02 AM
Shut up JP and look in the mirror. You and people like you will love for OUR Rays to move so you can say, " See I told you you the owners are greedy" You probally dont even care about baseball, but would love to ruin it for people who do. L
by Freddy
Apr 23, 2008 11:02 AM
If the team wins, people will come. Now the the price of gas, if you're not within 10 miles of the Big Air-Conditioned Concrete Flying Saucer, you ain't going.
by Bob
Apr 23, 2008 11:02 AM
This area in general dun't care for baysball. It they did, attendence would be bedder. The team should move to Orlano, and dun't let the door hit cha as u're leavin. Vote NO in Nov.
by JT
Apr 23, 2008 11:01 AM
No wonder the Rays won't be in town for long. "win and they will come"?? So I guess loyalty to a team is a concept lost on the people of Tampa. With support like that, it's no wonder the area will always be a bush-league s
by DT
Apr 23, 2008 11:01 AM
"Reality of situation" or your OPINION. The AC @ Trop is VERY "inviting". Location is fine,too. Where DID the NHL draw it's largest crowd? We have 10 yrs of tradition, other cities 100. Attendance and division rankings (
by kitty
Apr 23, 2008 11:01 AM
What kind of attendance did they draw in Orlando? If they packed the house, perhaps it's in their best interest to relocate.
by kitty
Apr 23, 2008 11:01 AM
Mr. Romano, read Dave Zirin's "Sportswriters Swoon Over DC Ballpark" in the Nation (it's available online as well) and find out the ugly truth resulting from the Expo's move to D.C.
by K
Apr 23, 2008 11:01 AM
Can someone please explain why the Trop is so unattractive? I've been to games and I think it's just fine for its use ... baseball. THE TAXPAYERS CANNOT AFFORD THIS BOONDOOGLE!!!!!
by Kay
Apr 23, 2008 11:01 AM
Sorry but I don't feel that an "unattractive" stadium keeps away fans at all. Would you not visit family or friends because you think they have an ugly home?
by J
Apr 23, 2008 11:00 AM
If they want to go to another city I say let 'em go. I was in DC when the Expos moved there and as a voter I refuse to get stuck with another ballpark bill with huge overruns.
by Kenny
Apr 23, 2008 11:00 AM
They built the dome in the WRONG place.
It should have been out by the dog track.
That's the BIGGEST problem. We won't go there due to the location.
by Lee
Apr 23, 2008 11:00 AM
John I very much enjoyed the commentary. I think there is a real feeling among fans that this is still a 70-90 team. And until this team breaks through with a strong couple weeks were they look improved, I don't expect anything to change.
by kyle
Apr 23, 2008 11:00 AM
Rays need to put a winner on the field so that that dad who brings his son dressed up in Yankees gear goes home feeling like a loser. Next time around that kid will want Rays gear on. That is how you expand a fan base.
by Paul
Apr 23, 2008 11:00 AM
Now there's a perfect solution. Sell the team, move them, and get rid of this financial burden on St Pete. We never wanted them in the first place.
by Tony
Apr 23, 2008 11:00 AM
What is so unattractive about the Trop? What is wrong with the comfortable A/C atmosphere, easy parking, easy access, and new scoreboard? Woud you rather, sweat, swat bugs, and make other plans when it's raining? Get with it, SUPPORT THE RAYS!
by Chris
Apr 23, 2008 11:00 AM
Rays and Bolts are in a race to see who gets moved 1st.
by Scott
Apr 23, 2008 11:00 AM
Seem to remember the Bucs and the Bolts in the same situation. Yes they are in Tampa but if the Rays start winning and not .500 they will come. And everyone knows it.Oh and JP... you might wanna check the Sports page.
by Ken
Apr 23, 2008 11:00 AM
Saint Petersberg is a disgusting city. That is why no one is at the games.
by Ryan
Apr 23, 2008 10:56 AM
No one went to Lightning and Bucs games either until they started winning. Win, and people will come.
by youngbuck
Apr 23, 2008 10:55 AM
MLB is partially to blame. Why award a franchise to a city full of bluehairs on fixed incomes?
by JB
Apr 23, 2008 10:55 AM
Finally someone gets it. No one cares about this team. Why rebuild Al OLang Stadium.. It is already big enough for what ever fans will come to watch a last place team with OWNERS that are trying to take our money$$$ and then sell the team
by robert
Apr 23, 2008 10:55 AM
Like I said...Al lang field would be perfect...Always full
by Ken
Apr 23, 2008 10:55 AM
Lazy writer. This same article was written about the Bucs in the 80's. When they started WINNING, people came. Then loyalty grew followed by sustained sellouts even during a recession. Same for the Lighting. Write something interesting next time
by TJ
Apr 23, 2008 10:55 AM
How many winning seasons have the Rays had again?
by Warrem
Apr 23, 2008 10:55 AM
Last time I checked - the Rays are (again) in last place and are already 5 games out of first. Attendance will rise with winning, NOT with "spending more".
by JW
Apr 23, 2008 10:55 AM
Romano - last time I checked, 3.4% was a good growth number in a recession. Especially considering the Rays are 8-11, SAME AS LAST YEAR. Hope doesn't sell tickets, Wins do. This article is a waste of time.
by Carol
Apr 23, 2008 10:55 AM
I wish I could vote AGAINST this stadium being built. REAL WORKING people (firemen, policemen, teachers) are losing their jobs because of stupid budget cuts. Worry about OVERPAID baseball players?! Take a pay cut and pitch in to build your
by Lonnie
Apr 23, 2008 10:53 AM
The $2.00 surcharge on game day ticket purchases has ended my attendance record of attendance at several Rays games per year. Fans outside St. Pete have no affordable way to purchase advance tickets.
by John
Apr 23, 2008 10:53 AM
My problem with the trop is the St. Pete police, they can't seem to handle the traffic when you have a crowd larger than 15k show up. I can't imagine what would happen if it was a near sell out every night. Traffic would be a mess.
by CharlieRay
Apr 23, 2008 10:53 AM
The Stadium is a wonderful place to go to a game with it's 72 Temp. It's to far to come. I know because we travel 70 miles every game(81). I agree they need to move but E of the Bay (Fair Grounds)with a retractable roof
by David
Apr 23, 2008 10:53 AM
The new owners have the ability to easily buy out the Trop
lease. I-4 & I-75 would be a great location...
by Ted
Apr 23, 2008 10:53 AM
Any wonder, with the traffic in Tampa it would take 2 hours to get to a game. Wake up the team is in a bad location.
by fan
Apr 23, 2008 10:53 AM
Nail on the head Michael - win and they will come . One game win streaks don't drum up alot of enthusiasm.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.