Make us your home page

Get the quickest, smartest news, analysis and photos from the Bucs game emailed to you shortly after the final whistle.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Support had to gauge for NFL's proposed change to playoff OT

It's a bold proposal that aims to correct what the NFL says is a growing trend, but the league's effort to change the overtime rule for playoff games might be a tough sell at the annual owners meeting this week in Orlando.

The competition committee will consider a proposal that would allow both teams to possess the ball in sudden death overtime in a playoff game if the team that wins the coin toss fails to score a touchdown on its first possession.

Currently, as in the regular season, if the team the wins the toss scores either a touchdown or a field goal on its first possession, the game is over. Under the proposed rule change, if the team that wins the toss kicks a field goal, the other team would get a possession also. If that team also scored a field goal, the present sudden-death format then would kick in, with the next team to score in any way the winner.

Under the proposal, if the team that wins the toss scores a touchdown, the game is over.

It's unclear how much support the proposal has. Passage requires yes votes from 24 of the 32 clubs.

Among those not in favor is the players union. Its reason is simple: Longer games mean a higher chance of injury.

The union usually has input into rule changes, said Falcons president Rich McKay, co-chairman of the competition committee and formerly the Bucs' general manager.

"In this case, I will be quite frank. The players have always said to us consistently over probably the last five to six years, 'Overtime works well; sudden death is a good way to go,' " McKay said. "We still believe this proposal is sudden death. It's just modified in a certain way. The game can still end on one play at any time.

"But I would say to you that players traditionally have thought, as a lot of coaches have thought, the system works okay. It's sudden death. It works okay. Let's keep it as it is."

That sentiment was echoed by a player whose team last season was adversely affected by the current rule.

"Personally, I like it the way it is," said Vikings kicker Ryan Longwell, whose team lost the NFC Championship Game in overtime when Garrett Hartley's kick sent New Orleans to the Super Bowl on the first possession.

"If you get the ball, go score. If you don't get the ball, stop 'em," Longwell told the Associated Press.

The proposal does not address overtime in the regular season, so that would not change.

McKay said the change is necessary because playoff games are critical and there are, on average, 1.2 overtime games each postseason. He offered more statistical support: 38.5 percent of overtime games since 1994 have been won by the team that loses the coin toss. That compares with 46.8 percent between 1974 and 1993.

"Changes occurred over time," McKay said. "Now the numbers have changed pretty dramatically.

"So, I would say to you that there are advocates who will say that we're trying to put in a system that emphasizes more skill and more strategy in overtime as opposed to the randomness of the coin flip. Those on the other side will tell you it works pretty well, it's exciting, and there's an opportunity for less plays."

Among the other proposals to be discussed at the owners meeting, which begins Monday and runs through Wednesday, is a measure that would add protections for receivers making catches.

It would be an extension of the "defenseless receiver" rule, which prohibits hits to the head until a player "has a chance to defend himself," McKay said. If the rule is implemented, such hits that are delivered prematurely would be considered unnecessary roughness.

Stephen F. Holder can be reached at

Support had to gauge for NFL's proposed change to playoff OT 03/20/10 [Last modified: Saturday, March 20, 2010 10:14pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Marc Topkin's takeaways from Thursday's Rays-Yankees game

    The Heater

    The 10 strikeouts look flashy, but RHP Chris Archer was not his sharpest Thursday. He allowed three runs on seven hits, including three straight in the two-run second and a Gary Sanchez homer in the third, and lasted only six innings, throwing 102 pitches.

  2. Rays fall to Yankees in 11 on Brett Gardner homer (w/ video)

    The Heater

    NEW YORK — The front office did its part Thursday, making two trades to bolster the roster in a push for the playoffs. But the Rays didn't follow up in a frustrating 6-5 11-inning loss to the Yankees.

    Rays reliever Andrew Kittredge stands on the mound and can only watch as the Yankees’ Brett Gardner starts to circle the bases after his walkoff home run leading off the 11th inning.
  3. Believe it! Rays are buyers, trade for reliever Dan Jennings and 1B/DH Lucas Duda

    The Heater

    NEW YORK — Dan Jennings' ability to render lefty hitters useless with a sinker that gets beaten into the ground and Lucas Duda's power to blast baseballs off and over outfield walls should make the Rays better.

    Lucas Duda
  4. Bucs' direction is decidedly up for first time in several years


    TAMPA — If you want to see a team give the Heisman Trophy stiff-arm to expectations, check out the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

    Tight end O.J. Howard, left, the Bucs’ first-round draft pick this year, was brought in to give QB Jameis Winston another big-play option.
  5. Rays at Yankees, 7:05 p.m. Friday, New York

    The Heater

    Tonight: at Yankees

    7:05, Yankee Stadium, New York

    TV/radio: Fox Sports Sun; 620-AM, 680-AM (Spanish)

    Tampa Bay Rays relief pitcher Austin Pruitt (50) in the dugout during the ninth inning of the game between the New York Yankees and the Tampa Bay Rays on Opening Day at Tropicana Field in St. Petersburg, Fla. on Sunday, April 2, 2017. The Tampa Bay Rays beat the New York Yankees 7-3.