Make us your home page

Get the quickest, smartest news, analysis and photos from the Bucs game emailed to you shortly after the final whistle.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Time to be concerned about quality of play when NFL lockout ends

Heaven help me but I almost cared about the NFL the other night.

It was late, and I was tired, and my defenses were down. I certainly didn't mean to care about the NFL. When the owners locked their gates, it turns out, my ability to give a rip was left on the outside.

Nevertheless, there I was, almost thinking about the possibilities of an upcoming season, if indeed such a season will exist. Fortunately, a Buffy the Vampire Slayer rerun came on, and I was able to withstand the temptation to ponder more deeply.

At this point, the football fans I know seem to talk less, think less and care less about pro football. At this point, apathy is the only ally football followers have.

When will the lockout be over? Who knows.

Who will outlast whom? Who cares?

This is the only sane position to have. Yes, you can get angry, as many people have, but outrage does not work on the owners, and scorn does not affect the players, and anger does not speed a process that seems hellbent on going into August and beyond.

The more passionate the emotions, the more obvious your frustration, the more it means you care — and the higher the probability is that those fans will be right there in the ticket line when the silliness ends.

What ought to alarm the players, and what ought to scare the dickens out of the owners, is the growing apathy. That's the real cost of this wasted offseason. Every time a fan turns his head, the Benjamin Franklins in his wallet do the same.

And so it does not go. Bounce around the Internet and you can find dozens of NFL headlines a day, and not one of them says anything new. Secret meetings? Positive signs? Someone else arrested? Both sides are talking, neither side is listening, and what else is new.

You know what ought to be new?

By now, someone — anyone — should be concerned about how good the football will be when the NFL comes back.

The quality cannot be the same, you know. A league cannot sacrifice all the organized team activities and offseason workouts and minicamps without losing chemistry and cohesiveness. The result is bound to be a lessened product on the field.

Forever, coaches have told us how important such activities are to the development of a football team. And so it stands to reason: If these workouts are vital to success, how can it not be a concern when they are stripped away?

Granted, it helps when teams such as the Bucs, Patriots and Broncos have player-run workouts. But no, it isn't the same as organized practices (which, as you remember, was where the Bucs' turnaround really began last year). The offseason is about chemistry and focus and timing and understanding. You can't trash all that without a cost.

Also, granted, all teams are in the same boat. Still, we aren't talking about competitive balance. We're talking about level of play. And the longer this thing goes, the sloppier things are bound to look. As for the NFL, it seems to hope no one will notice.

Go back to 1987, the only time the league had a stupider work stoppage. Back then, someone had the grand idea of interrupting the season two weeks in. Worse, someone decided to put different bodies into familiar laundry to see if the fans could tell the difference. For three games the NFL charged real money for fake players and called it football.

When the real players came back, it was a mess. Some were angry about the settlement, and some were disappointed that replacement players had taken the jobs of some former teammates, and some were annoyed that teammates had crossed the picket line, and some were outraged that the results of the three fake games counted in the standings.

At the time, I was a writer covering the Dolphins for the Miami Herald, and what I remember most is this: The Dolphins team that left camp that year was not the team that came back. Post-strike, the Dolphins never seemed quite as efficient, quite as focused as Don Shula's teams usually were. That team should have won 10 or 11 games; it ended up 8-7.

And those guys had a training camp.

So what happens this time? Does a team have to spend some of its training camp learning what it should have learned in minicamp and part of its regular season learning what it should have learned in training camp? Will a young team have progressed as much as it would have ordinarily? Will there be more injuries, more fumbles, more miscommunication? Will coaches get fired next year because the lockout kept them from doing their jobs properly this year?

Now ask yourself this: In their struggles to turn $10 bills into $20s, do the owners really care?

Eventually this will be over, because money says it will be. Teams will still win, and teams will still lose, and eventually most fans will cheer because that is what fans do.

Along the way, however, quality will be lessened, and passion will be lost.

The next time the owners and players have one of these double-secret decoder-ring meetings, maybe someone ought to bring that up.


Owners to negotiate with selves this week

Progress has been reported from the past three weeks of negotiations between owners and locked-out players, but a hurdle to address this week is a small faction of owners' skepticism about the financial dynamics involved in the current proposals. Previously scheduled league meetings in Chicago beginning Tuesday will be geared toward convincing all owners to embrace the direction of the negotiations. For approval of any collective bargaining agreement, 24 of the 32 owners must agree. The Associated Press reported the group of unhappy owners isn't large enough to derail an agreement, but it could lead to some heavy lobbying in Chicago, where owners have been told to expect Tuesday's meeting to possibly spill over into Wednesday. One item of contention likely is the minimum that teams can spend on salaries each year and how it is determined, a key for small-market franchises. Many believe that in order for the season to launch on time, a deal must be in place by early to mid July.

Times wires

Time to be concerned about quality of play when NFL lockout ends 06/18/11 [Last modified: Saturday, June 18, 2011 6:29pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. College World Series: Gators, LSU face off in all-SEC finals


    OMAHA, Neb. — The matchup for the College World Series finals bolsters the case for those who say the best baseball in the land is played in the SEC.

    Florida’s Brady Singer, delivering during a CWS win over Louisville last week, is scheduled to start tonight against LSU.
  2. Jones: Fox Sports Sun shows depth in Rays coverage

    TV and Radio

    tom jones' two cents

    Tampa Bay Times columnist Tom Jones looks back at the best and worst from a weekend of televised sports.

    Best coverage

    Who needs the NBA draft board? Certainly not the Vertical’s Adrian Wojnarowski.
  3. Brian Boyle says returning to Lightning a 'huge option'


    As former Lightning forward Brian Boyle approaches free agency this week, he said he's trying to stay busy.

  4. Rays journal: Blake Snell to rejoin rotation, Erasmo Ramirez heads to bullpen

    The Heater

    ST. PETERSBURG — LHP Blake Snell is rejoining the Rays' rotation, but the move has as much to do with helping the bullpen as it does with Snell's improvement during his time at Triple-A Durham.

    Tampa Bay Rays relief pitcher Erasmo Ramirez (30) delivers a pitch in the first inning against the Cincinnati Reds Wednesday, June 21, 2017 in St. Petersburg.
  5. Rays' bullpen stars lit up in loss to Orioles

    The Heater

    ST. PETERSBURG — Saturday it was the soft underbelly of the bullpen that let one get away from the Rays, incurring the wrath of the team's faithful followers, who wondered why the high-leverage guys weren't pitching.

    Rays closer Alex Colome, coming in with the score tied in the ninth, allows three runs in his second straight poor outing.