Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Hockey: Lightning
Special report
  • Right by Miles
    Two teenage boys are in a car chase with a reckless, sexually perverted Polk County sheriff’s deputy. The boys crash, killing Miles White, 16. But the sheriff’s office does not investigate its deputy’s involvement. Why?
  • More special reports
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
  • Fall TV match-ups
    The networks try to catch viewers' attention after the writers strike, while cable channels go for a knockout blow by debuting new series at the same time. Let's see who the winners are.
  • More multimedia reports
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

Hold off judging Lightning for now

By John Romano, Times Sports Columnist
In print: Saturday, July 5, 2008


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

TAMPA — Let's see if I have this straight:

In the span of a week, the Lightning acquired a bunch of scorers, one goaltender and a first-round draft pick in 2009. And all it cost them was a ton of money and quite a bit of scorn.

Personally, I can live with that.

For no matter how loud the outcry over Dan Boyle's departure, the Lightning's new ownership is at least making a move. No one knows for certain if it's forward or backward, but it's better than the constant tweaking that had translated into three playoff victories in the past three years.

Once, stability was our savior in Tampa Bay. It helped a wayward franchise settle down and become a Stanley Cup champion. Lately, stability has been a hindrance. It has kept the Lightning from realizing the glory was gone and a new direction was needed.

Is Tampa Bay a lesser hockey team today because Boyle has been traded to San Jose? Absolutely. But is the Lightning a better team than a couple of weeks ago after the acquisitions of Steve Stamkos, Ryan Malone, Gary Roberts, Vinny Prospal, Radim Vrbata and Olaf Kolzig? You bet.

The point is this is still a work in progress. It looked great when they were spending money Monday, and it looked shaky when they were shedding salary Friday, and I assume it will be somewhere in the middle come October.

Because Friday's trade of Boyle and Brad Lukowich cannot be the end of Tampa Bay's dealings. The roster has too many spare forwards and not enough quality defenders. If this roster remains intact for the rest of the summer, new owner Oren Koules will literally have no defense.

Having said that, I understand the desire to deal Boyle. I couldn't swear it was a good deal for the Lightning, but at least you can see the rationale behind it.

As a 32-year-old defenseman, Boyle's six-year, $40-million contract was eventually going to become an anchor. So maybe new defenseman Matt Carle will not be as good as Boyle in 2008-09, but he might be by 2010-11. And he's going to cost a heck of a lot less.

Boyle's trade has given the Lightning flexibility. Just as the trade of Brad Richards did a few months ago. This had become a top-heavy franchise with too much money devoted to four players. Now the salary structure has been spread around, and the results will be all over the front lines.

Prospal is back to play alongside Vinny Lecavalier and Marty St. Louis. Malone and Vrbata immediately give Stamkos proven linemates. And, among them, Roberts, Jeff Halpern, Ryan Craig, Nick Tarnasky and, perhaps, Evgeny Artyukhin give the Lightning legitimate depth on the third and fourth lines.

So the offense looks better. And the goaltending, with Mike Smith and Kolzig, has been upgraded. That leaves the defense, which was weak last season and weaker still today. Again, as long as Koules has a plan to upgrade the blue line, it's hard to argue with the remaking of the roster.

I will, however, take issue with the way this deal was handled. Just last week, Koules blew off a question about Boyle trade rumors, saying he'd answer anything important. Was that an outright lie? Perhaps not technically.

But Koules purposefully gave the impression he was not interested in trading Boyle. Now maybe he gets a pass because he's new at this hockey executive gig, but being deceitful with your fan base is one of the few inexcusable sins of ownership. In a sense, it's more distasteful than any potential trade.

At any rate, this has been the most eventful couple of weeks this franchise has ever seen in the offseason. Stamkos is the biggest draft pick since Lecavalier, Malone and Vrbata are the biggest acquisitions since Nikolai Khabibulin, and Boyle's departure is the most painful since, well, Richards a couple of months ago.

Look, nothing comes for free. The Lightning had to endure a miserable season to get Stamkos in the draft. Koules had to commit $72-million in salaries to bring in a fistful of free agents. And Tampa Bay fans have to say goodbye to Boyle, and one of the final links to the Stanley Cup, in order to make other necessary moves.

So no matter how you feel today — exhilarated or angry — just remember nothing is guaranteed. Koules may think these moves will turn the Lightning into a winner, but he doesn't know for sure. You may think trading Boyle will be a disaster, but that's no guarantee, either.

The only way to grade these moves is over time.

And that's what's going to make this season worth watching.

John Romano can be reached at romano@sptimes.com.



[Last modified: Jul 08, 2008 05:28 PM]



Comments on this article
by Spooky Jul 8, 2008 5:28 PM
With Richards gone, and Taylor retiring, I guess (and I never thought I would say this- I like Vinnie with the C. St. L needs an A, and maybe Recci with the other A? I am not sure who else has experience, leadership and tenure with the Bolts anymore.
by Jim Jul 7, 2008 7:20 PM
MATT? Did you really just quote the coach the team just "came to a mutual agreement with" or canned??? LOL "You can't fix stupid" - Ron White
by Fred Jul 7, 2008 6:42 PM
Remember Young for Garza and Bartlet? Lets see how this one plays out.
by Bill Jul 7, 2008 6:12 PM
Jim - I agree with you. Boyle left an awful lot to be dsired as a defenseman. He made one mistake after another late last season.
by Bill Jul 7, 2008 5:24 PM
Jim - I totally agree with you. He made more mistakes in games late last season that it was hard to keep count. 40 million for 6 years was rediculous. Another of Feaster's follies ?
by ed Jul 7, 2008 5:17 PM
Overload on offense and forget defense. Can anyone name any sport where this idea has produced a winner? BTW, just canceled my season tickets. Maybe next year *if* the owners learn from their mistakes.
by Hawkeye Jul 6, 2008 12:28 AM
"the acquisitions of Steve Stamkos" Come on John. You can't add that as an acquisition since the Lightning were going to get him anyway. It's not losing Boyler, it's the way they did it. Who wants to play for someone like that?
by Matt Jul 5, 2008 11:27 PM
@LisaMarie - can I have your tickets then? Safe is death.
by Denny Jul 5, 2008 11:03 PM
Quote..."but being deceitful with your fan base is one of the few inexcusable sins of ownership" is a dumb thing for this sportswriter to say. How can you negotiate a trade with possible teams with anything but secrecy? Must of hurt Romano's ego
by Steve Jul 5, 2008 11:03 PM
Agreed let's give it time, I'm excited that they are trying and like the moves they are making. I really like the Boyle trade. And what do you want the owners to do, come out and say they are interested in trading Boyle?
by Jake Jul 5, 2008 11:02 PM
Your article is spot on. Good piece.
by Dan Jul 5, 2008 11:02 PM
This is a last place team. Intent may have been to keep Boyle, but then in considering opportunities, looking long term, etc, he became expendible. Give the owners a break. All we know is that we were certain of another last place finish. GO BOLTS!!!
by Don Jul 5, 2008 11:02 PM
Yes, the jury is still out on whether or not this was a good hockey move. But you do not lie to your fans. It is an issue of basic integrity. Can we now trust anything out of the mouths of ownership now? Especially about moving the team?
by Casper Jul 5, 2008 11:02 PM
Oh yeah I forgot, Lukowich had to go because Olie the Goalie wears #37.
by Ron Jul 5, 2008 11:02 PM
It's not like the Boyle trade is the finger pulled from the defensive dike; Boyle wasn't a full time bone cruncher at D, though his enormous puck skills sugar coated that. Kolzig on board, Boyle out? Seems like a major plus in our favor
by Bob B. Jul 5, 2008 10:56 PM
Ditto. John I agree with you 100%. You have to give up somthing to improve. Good article.
by David Jul 5, 2008 10:55 PM
It's tough to see Boyle go, I believe that changes needed to be made but I don't think that was one of them. We will see over time I guess...
by Jim Jul 5, 2008 10:55 PM
Boyle's Defense left a lot to be desired.what he gave in offense he took away in defense.When you're supposed to be a #1 D-Man that's a terrible trade-off.By shedding Boyle they just shaved 25 goals off the goals Against.
by Berliner Jul 5, 2008 10:55 PM
Thank you for being the voice of reason to both sides of the coin. And for clarifying eactly how Koules answered questions about Boyle last week. He didnt. Only Melrose did, and Melrose isnt the owner. Go Bolts!
by Dave Jul 5, 2008 10:55 PM
From a fan perspective, the problem is giving a multi-year contract and a no-trade clause and then trading that player mere months later. That clause is for the fans, too. It tells us he will be here. Makes you worry about Vinny's "no-trade clause."
by Jack Jul 5, 2008 10:55 PM
Lets face it. We were a last place team with $40 million dollar defenseman. Boyle was out most of the year so we reward him with 40 million. A great puck moving defenseman, but rarely cleaned house or knocked somebody down in front of his own net.
by LisaMarie Jul 5, 2008 10:55 PM
I'm a STH and cannot for the life of me see any joy forthcoming, nor do I even have a desire to watch. This is just a bunch of guys thrown together by publicity seeking owners. Who gives a crap anymore? Not me.
by Rich Jul 5, 2008 10:54 PM
Boyles deal did him in,the deal made with both owners & Jay Feaster, what does he do now?Appearantly good at watching! In any case boyle became an ingredible puck moving d'man, after being quitely acquired for almost nothing.still hate to see him go.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT