Sunday, June 17, 2018
Sports

'I hope you realize how deep the rabbit hole is'

I was walking to my neighborhood Starbucks one morning last year when I received a Facebook message request from "Ben Rotenberg."

"Hello mr Ben," the sender began, "are you interesting information about fixed match? I be write in Russian."

I was certainly interested in learning more about this figure who had created a Facebook account in (almost) my name for the sole purpose of contacting me, so we switched to Russian.

Tediously translating his messages and then my responses, we began to talk. He said he had read an article I had written about match fixing in tennis and the case of a first-round match at a small tournament in Dallas that had been flagged for suspicious betting patterns and volume.

That match, my new Facebook friend said, was "only a drop in the ocean."

"I hope you realize how deep the rabbit hole is," he added. "I personally suffered from these people. And they have a sense of impunity. It must stop."

Not confident in the secrecy of Facebook, even with this puppet account, he moved our conversation to Viber, a messaging app popular in Eastern Europe that never stores communications on a server.

On the second day of correspondence, he asked me to find the live-score display of a match at an ATP Challenger event that was midway through the first set. "You cannot talk to anyone about this," he said.

He then named the player who he declared would have his serve broken in the second service game of the second set. As that set began, he said he had learned that the score of the set would be 6-0.

Sure enough, one, two, three games quickly fell. Knowing that the ATP streams many Challenger matches live, I scrambled to find the correct page to watch the rest for myself. When I tuned in, it seemed I had found what I was promised. While some of the player's shots appeared ordinary, many were missed wildly wide and long, and others dumped droopily into the net. There was a double fault on match point, and the set ended with a score of 6-0 after just 19 minutes.

(The player whom I was told would throw the match was not a good actor. Several tennis gamblers noted on Twitter what they considered a blatant dumping of the match, with one creating a GIF of a serve that had landed near the baseline.)

In Melbourne last week, with reports of match fixing stealing the show at the Australian Open, I tracked down the player who won that match last year. I asked him what he remembered about it — specifically the speedy second set.

"He dropped his level, for sure," he said, adding that he had not suspected anything unusual. "I cannot say anything; I did not start to play amazing shots."

After that match, my new pen pal had written to me: "What do you think? I was not joking. Are you interested in getting into the hole?"

"I'm impressed," I replied.

Having proved his credentials, my source grew more effusive, telling me more about the channels by which games, sets and matches are bought and sold.

There was an international network of players and fixers, he said, with many of the fixers — himself included — having played tennis on some professional level. The connections these players already had in locker rooms around the circuit made them ideally suited for recruiting when they shifted from the playing side to the paying side of the equation. Communications, like ours, were conducted over Viber or other similar untraceable apps; phone numbers were often changed as well.

He named three former players who led the fixing rings in which he spun: one from Russia, one from Central Europe and one from Central Asia. I had heard of only one, but all three had profile pages on the ATP website showing rankings that never touched the top 150.

He reeled off several matches that he said included fixed sets.

Many were at the bottom-tier Futures level, where prize money of $10,000 is divided among all players, and first round losers in singles only get a check for $98. Some, though, were on the main ATP and WTA Tours (one allegedly planned 6-0 set, at a WTA tournament in China, had taken place two months earlier).

He also claimed to know the rough prices of various fixes on the menu, which I couldn't independently corroborate. Buying a service break at a Futures event cost $300 to $500, he said. A set was $1,000 to $2,000 and a match was $2,000 to $3,000.

It was more expensive to fix an outcome on the next higher tier, the Challenger level, with sets and matches running in the $10,000 to $15,000 range, he said.

On the ATP and WTA Tours, a single set could cost $25,000. A match was in the neighborhood of $100,000.

"It is an interesting spectacle," he said of buying a result. "You feel like a prophet."

Several times he tried to contact me while I was asleep to tell me about a fixed live match at the Futures level. I had never heard of any of the players he was mentioning. Although his information continued to seem accurate, much of it ultimately felt meaningless. There are about 120,000 professional tennis matches in a year; though thousands of dollars can flow through the betting markets of any of them with the expansion of live score data and then live betting, the ones at the lowest levels, from which the majority of his information sprung, meant little to the level of elite tennis that I cover.

Promising more information about matches at Grand Slams and the ATP and WTA Tours, he suggested I chip in some money so we could buy knowledge of the upper floors of the operations. After repeatedly making it clear that I would not cross that line, he went silent in December, and has not logged on to the Viber or Facebook accounts he had used since.

On Sunday, as I was at Court 6 at Melbourne Park watching an Australian Open mixed doubles match that someone else had flagged as suspicious, I was thinking about how curious wagering patterns and a player's pointedly poor performance are easy to spot — but aren't enough to conclusively prove fixing. For that, you need an invitation into the invisible. Mine might not come again.

Contributing: Masha Goncharova

Comments
For starters: Rays at Yankees, looking to avoid a four-game sweep

For starters: Rays at Yankees, looking to avoid a four-game sweep

UPDATE, 11:37: Interesting decision by the Rays to move Adames to 2B today and reinstall Hechavarria at SS as he came off DL following Arroyo injury.Here is the Rays lineup:Duffy 3bBauers 1bRamos cCron dhAdames 2bHechavarria ssGomez rfRefsnyder lfFie...
Published: 06/17/18

Tarpons’ Castillo, North squad notch FSL All-Star Game victory

TAMPA — The Tarpons' Diego Castillo led the North squad to a 5-0 victory in the 57th Florida State League All-Star Game on his home field Saturday night.The game MVP went 2-for-4 with two doubles and started the scoring for the North in the sec...
Published: 06/17/18

Captain’s Corner: Trout bite at its best

The trout bite has been the best I’ve seen all year. Fish up to 26 inches have been common recently. Fish are sitting on the flats’ deeper edges, where the water is deeper and cooler, and moves a little more swiftly. Live sardines and hard plastic ba...
Updated: 7 hours ago
Peering into the crystal baseball to see what Rays could look like in 2019

Peering into the crystal baseball to see what Rays could look like in 2019

The Rays are still talking, as they should, about playing for something this season. The reality is that almost every move they've made, going back to the end of last season, and in some cases further, has been about 2019 and beyond.Clearing out vete...
Published: 06/16/18
Updated: 06/17/18
Rays lose again to Yankees, this time 4-1

Rays lose again to Yankees, this time 4-1

NEW YORK — Kevin Cash was not going to go all Lou Piniella on his Rays, raging and ripping and roaring over their latest mess, a 4-1 Saturday loss to the Yankees that didn't feel that close.Which is too bad because Piniella, the volcanic former...
Published: 06/16/18

Sports on TV/radio for Sunday, June 17

TODAYAutosXfinity: Iowa 250 qualifying2:30 p.m.FS2Xfinity: Iowa 2505 p.m.FS1BaseballMarlins at Orioles1 p.m.FSFRays at Yankees2 p.m.Fox Sun; 620-AMAstros at Royals2 p.m.MLBRed Sox at Mariners (in progress)5 p.m.MLBCubs at Cardinals8 p.m.ESPNCollege b...
Published: 06/16/18
Rays journal: Arroyo on DL, Hechavarria returns

Rays journal: Arroyo on DL, Hechavarria returns

NEW YORK — Just when it seemed like SS Adeiny Hechavarria might not play another game for the Rays, he will rejoin them on Sunday.The Rays announced after Saturday's 4-1 loss that INF Christian Arroyo was placed on the DL due to an oblique stra...
Published: 06/16/18
Marc Topkin’s takeaways from Rays-Yankees

Marc Topkin’s takeaways from Rays-Yankees

RHP Ryne Stanek did his job as the opener just fine in getting four outs on Saturday, but for the Rays' unorthodox pitching plan to work it takes a team effort. And LHP Ryan Yarbrough's inability to throw strikes quickly put them in a hole.The experi...
Published: 06/16/18
For starters: Rays at Yankees, trying to break through

For starters: Rays at Yankees, trying to break through

UPDATE, 11:49: Cash said he played Cron at 1B in an effort to get him more involved in the game, indicated he may do so again Sunday (with Bauers off vs. LH Sabathia) and should have done so more as Cron struggled. … Cash reiterated that CF Kev...
Published: 06/16/18
Bucs journal: O.J. Howard poised to take off?

Bucs journal: O.J. Howard poised to take off?

TAMPA — There's always a lot of attention on the rookie class this time of year, rightfully so. There's a reason the Bucs focused on defense, and DT Vita Vea, CBs M.J. Stewart, Carlton Davis and S Justin Whitehead all look like they could have ...
Published: 06/16/18