JPMorgan Chase and the Justice Department have reached a tentative $13 billion settlement over the bank's questionable mortgage practices leading up to the financial crisis of 2008, the New York Times reported Saturday, citing unnamed people briefed on the talks. It would be a record penalty that would cap weeks of heated negotiating and underscore the extent of the bank's legal woes.
The deal, which the Justice Department took the lead in negotiating and which came together after a Friday night call involving Attorney General Eric Holder and JPMorgan's chief executive, Jamie Dimon, would resolve an array of state and federal investigations into the bank's sale of troubled mortgage investments. That type of investment, securities backed by subprime home loans, was at the heart of the financial crisis.
While the deal would put those civil cases to rest, it would not save JPMorgan from a parallel criminal inquiry from federal prosecutors in California, the people briefed on the talks said. Under the terms of the preliminary deal, the people said, the bank would also have to assist prosecutors with an investigation into former employees who helped create the mortgage investments.
The $13 billion deal, which could still fall apart over issues like how much wrongdoing the bank is willing to acknowledge, would represent something of a reckoning for Wall Street, whose outsize risk taking in the mortgage business nearly toppled the economy in 2008. It might also provide a measure of catharsis to the investing public, which suffered billions of dollars in losses from buying bad mortgage securities.
For the Justice Department, often criticized for being soft on big banks, the deal suggests that the Obama administration's crackdown on Wall Street has gained some momentum in recent months. It comes less than three months after federal prosecutors and the FBI in Manhattan announced a criminal indictment of the hedge fund SAC Capital, which was accused of permitting a "systematic" insider-trading scheme to unfold from 1999 to 2010. The hedge fund, according to people briefed on the case, is negotiating a plea deal that would force it to plead guilty to criminal misconduct and pay more than $1 billion in penalties.
The JPMorgan penalty, if approved, would surpass other major Wall Street settlements and represent the largest that a single company has ever paid in settling with the Justice Department. HSBC, for example, agreed to a $1.9 billion penalty last year over money laundering accusations. BP paid $4.5 billion for its role in the huge oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
The cost to JPMorgan goes beyond the bottom line. The settlement would deal a reputational blow to the bank and Dimon, who steered JPMorgan through the crisis without a quarterly loss or major government scuffle. Now Dimon's tenure is engulfed in turmoil, the consequence of fighting a multifront battle with federal authorities scrutinizing everything from a $6 billion trading loss in London last year to the bank's hiring of well-connected employees in China.
In the mortgage case, the size of the penalty underpins its importance. The $13 billion penalty, according to one of the people briefed on the talks, would include about $9 billion in fines and $4 billion in relief for struggling homeowners.
Some defense lawyers question whether the government is going too far in demanding that sum. A $13 billion penalty would be more than half what JPMorgan earned in profits last year. The lawyers also note that some of the mortgage securities in question are not JPMorgan's. Rather, the bank inherited the liabilities when it bought Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual in 2008, at the height of the financial crisis.
A spokesman for JPMorgan declined to comment. Brian Fallon, a Justice Department spokesman, declined to comment.
The government investigations into JPMorgan, which focus on securities the bank sold from 2005 to 2007, raised questions about whether JPMorgan had failed to fully warn investors about the risks of the deals.
One of the largest pieces of the $13 billion deal could come from a settlement with the Federal Housing Finance Agency. The agency sued JPMorgan over loans it had sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-controlled mortgage finance companies. The settlement would also resolve a case related to Bear Stearns, the people briefed on the matter said, a lawsuit that has pitted the New York attorney general against JPMorgan.
Eric Schneiderman, the New York attorney general, sued JPMorgan last October, saying Bear Stearns and its lending unit, EMC Mortgage, had duped investors who bought mortgage securities assembled by the companies from 2005 through 2007. Through a deal backstopped by the government, JPMorgan bought Bear Stearns in 2008.
Dimon has called the lawsuit unfair, arguing that JPMorgan should not be penalized for buying Bear Stearns.
* * *
$13 BILLION The JPMorgan penalty would surpass other major Wall Street settlements and represent the largest that a single company has ever paid in settling with the Justice Department.
$1.9 BILLION penalty that HSBC agreed to last year over money laundering accusations.
$4.5 BILLION How much BP paid for its role in the huge oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.