Advertisement

Dear Readers,

The coronavirus pandemic has caused widespread disruption to the lives of everyone in Tampa Bay and to so many businesses in our community. Here at the Tampa Bay Times, we continue to provide free, up-to-date information at tampabay.com/coronavirus as a public service. But we need your help. Please consider supporting us by subscribing or donating, and by sharing our work. Thank you.

  1. Florida Politics
  2. /
  3. The Buzz

Changing Florida’s Constitution? A new bill would make it harder than ever.

But some Republican senators are balking at the harsh terms in one of the bills.
The question before the 1st District Court of Appeal in Tallahassee is whether Florida is following its constitutional duty to provide a high-quality education to public school students.
The question before the 1st District Court of Appeal in Tallahassee is whether Florida is following its constitutional duty to provide a high-quality education to public school students.

TALLAHASSEE — At the urging of Gov. Ron DeSantis and corporate interests, Republican lawmakers last year made it dramatically harder for groups to gather petitions to change the Florida Constitution.

This year, they’re looking to make it even tougher — so much so that it even some GOP senators object.

A Senate committee, along party lines, advanced Wednesday a bill that would likely increase the cost and the amount of time it takes to get amendments on the ballot.

Groups wanting to amend the state’s Constitution would have to gather more than three times as many signatures before being deemed eligible for the ballot by a review from the Florida Supreme Court. On top of that, each signature could cost more.

The changes would be so drastic that Sen. Jeff Brandes, R-St. Petersburg, called the requirements “burdensome and close to legislative bondage.” Brandes and two other Republican senators, who all voted for the bill, said they wouldn’t vote for it again unless it was modified significantly.

“It shouldn’t be one of these convoluted processes where you get tripped up at one place or the other,” Sen. Tom Lee, R-Thonotosassa, said. “It is too strong. It is too convoluted.”

The next stop for the bill, Senate Bill 1794, is the Senate floor. A similar bill in the House has already made it to the House floor.

In the two decades that Republicans have controlled Florida’s Legislature and the governor’s mansion, they’ve steadily made it harder to pass amendments to the state constitution. To make it on the ballot, organizers of a petition need to gather 766,200 signatures, and 60 percent of voters need to approve it to become law.

Despite the restrictions, Floridians, and liberal groups in particular, have succeeded in passing amendments to the constitution that allowed the use of medical marijuana, money to protect environmental lands and a requirement that lawmakers draw fair legislative and congressional districts.

In 2018, Amendment 4, which allowed felons to vote, received more votes than any person up for election that fall. Lawmakers last year, urged by DeSantis — an opponent of the felon-voting amendment — passed a bill in the final hours of the legislative session that restricted who could gather signatures and how those people were paid.

“Last year, we had so many amendments that I think we need reform,” DeSantis said after session ended last year. "We’ve let too much policy go into the Constitution.”

This year’s bill in the Senate would restrict the process even further. Currently, petition gatherers have to collect 10 percent, or 76,632, signatures to trigger a review by the Florida Supreme Court, which decides whether the amendment is legal.

The bill would require 33 percent of signatures before making it to the court. That means organizers would have to put up more money and effort before organizers know if their measure can actually qualify for the ballot. Organizers would also need to collect more signatures from more congressional districts.

Compounding the challenge, the bill would likely increase the costs for signatures to be verified by local supervisors of election. Currently, they are allowed to charge organizers up to 10 cents for each signature. The bill would raise the amount to the “actual cost” for the supervisor to review each signature.

The bill would also give lawmakers a chance to evaluate the measure and offer an opinion about its merits. Currently, when an amendment receives enough voters to trigger a Supreme Court opinion, it requires the attorney general and state economists to evaluate the proposal. The bill lets the Legislature to give an opinion on the amendment, which would be available to voters to read at polling sites.

Lee said adding the Legislature’s analysis would be pointless.

“If we wanted to pass it, we would have done that, and we didn’t,” Lee said. “So why are we getting involved after the fact?”

Sen. Travis Hutson, R-Palm Coast, said the changes were meant to limit fraud in the petition process and lighten the Supreme Court’s workload.

Democrats during Wednesday’s committee noted that Republicans failed to show evidence of fraud or that the court’s workload is problematic. They said it was apparent the bill was intended to crack down on voter initiatives. Sen. José Javier Rodríguez, D-Miami, tried and failed to rename the bill the “Direct Democracy Limitation Act.”

“Let’s give it a name and tell our constituents what it’s doing,” Rodriguez said.

The only two people who said they supported the bill on Wednesday were lobbyists representing Associated Industries of Florida and the Florida Chamber of Commerce, two groups funded by some of the largest corporations in the state.

These business coalitions are adamantly opposed to an amendment to raise the minimum wage, which is set to go before voters this fall. And Republicans have opposed amendments that would ban assault weapons and allow medical marijuana.

Sen. Rob Bradley, R-Fleming Island, said he supported the bill because it should be tough to amend the Constitution.

“It is not designed to write a budget,” Bradley said. “It is not designed to set run-of-the-mill policy.”

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement