TALLAHASSEE — Concerned that social media companies were conspiring against conservatives, Florida Republicans sent a measure Thursday to Gov. Ron DeSantis that would punish online platforms that lawmakers assert discriminate against conservative thought.
The governor had urged lawmakers to deliver the legislation to his desk as part of a broader effort to regulate Big Tech companies — in how they collect and use information they harvest from consumers and in how social media platforms treat their users.
Republicans in Florida and elsewhere have accused the companies of censoring conservative thought on social media platforms by removing posts they consider inflammatory or using algorithms to reduce the visibility of posts that go against the grain of mainstream ideas.
With the ubiquity of social media, the sites have become modern-day public squares — where people share in the most trivial of matters but also in ideas and information that often are unvetted.
In recent years, social media companies have acted more aggressively in controlling the information posted on their platforms. In some cases, the companies have moved to delete posts over what they see as questionable veracity or their potential to stoke violence.
Republicans filed the bill several weeks after Twitter permanently suspended the account of then-President Donald Trump after his supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol in January. The social media giant had muted some of Trump’s posts because of concerns that his tweets would foment further violence.
DeSantis is a strong ally of the former president, and the Republican governor is supporting hefty financial penalties against social media platforms that suspend the accounts of political candidates.
Under the measure, social media platforms would face fines of $100,000 for each day they suspend the account of a candidate for statewide office, and $10,000 a day for other candidates.
The bill targets social media platforms that have more than 100 million monthly users, which include such online giants as Twitter and Facebook.
But lawmakers carved out an exception for Disney and its apps by including that theme park owners wouldn’t be subject to the law, which Democrats saw as hypocritical.
“If Facebook buys a theme park, does that prevent us from being able to regulate what happens on Facebook?” asked Democratic Rep. Andrew Learned, D-Brandon.
“So, if they bought a theme park and named it Zuckerland, and he met the definition of a theme park under Florida statute, then yes,” said Rep. Blaise Ingoglia, R-Spring Hill.
Ingoglia explained that lawmakers tried to make an exception for a Disney+ app. Democrats argued that the language proves the effort was political. Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, called the Disney exception “comical.”
“This exemption for companies that own theme parks is an example of the loophole in this bill,” said Eskamani. “This bill is really political in nature. It’s not about trying to impact the concerns of de-platforming. Now it’s catering to a specific company.”
Republicans accuse social media companies of violating the free speech of conservatives or anyone whose ideas go against the mainstream.
The measure would require a social media company to inform users if their posts have been removed and explain how it became aware of the post and why it moved to censor the user. In some cases, the law would allow users to sue the companies.
Opponents defended the right of social media companies, as private entities, to control the flow of information on their platforms.
By BOBBY CAINA CALVAN and BRENDAN FARRINGTON, Associated Press