This Tuesday, 200 leaders from around the state will gather at the Tampa Convention Center to begin designing the future of wild Florida. That’s not the stated purpose of the meeting, but it could be the effect. In reality, people are gathering to start planning three toll roads, but a lot more is at stake.
I remember taking part in a planning exercise at the same convention center in 2006. Reality Check Tampa Bay brought together 300 community leaders to envision infrastructure for a projected doubling of Tampa Bay’s population. We divided into teams around table-sized maps. Each team was given yellow and red Legos to represent new residential and commercial development and yellow and red ribbon to represent roadways and public transit. I raised my hand and asked whether there were any green Legos or ribbons that could represent new conservation areas and wildlife corridors. The organizers actually had green dots for planning green space — but had forgotten to pass them out.
I was baffled that the most fundamental and necessary infrastructure — green infrastructure — was so easily left out of the planning process. But once the Reality Check organizers passed out the green dots, the diverse group of people at my table all saw logic of first laying down green across the map to protect land and water corridors, and then developing our buildings and roads around connected networks of green.
Thirteen years later, as Florida’s development plans surge forward, the green dots are once again at risk of being forgotten. So I’m raising my hand again. What if we were to give the road planning task forces some stacks of green dots — the option of first protecting a statewide network of connected green space, and then developing potential new roads and developments around it? I bet most people would choose this strategy.
I appreciate Senate President Bill Galvano’s recent column in the Tampa Bay Times stating that the toll road study areas “contain significant land designated as ‘critical wildlife corridor opportunity areas.’” And that his view is the toll road program “can use its broad scope of authority to pursue options to acquire land that would serve to both protect wildlife corridors and improve coastal resiliency efforts.” This type of thinking is a big step in the right direction.
Indeed, while the new toll road corridors are being considered, I would like planners and all Floridians to please be mindful of another statewide corridor network — the Florida Wildlife Corridor — a connected network of land and water that supports us all while providing habitat for iconic wildlife such as the Florida panther and Florida black bear. I have walked and paddled most of this corridor and can bear witness to the fragile network of life-sustaining lands and waters that is largely hidden in plain sight but right now needs everyone’s attention to be saved.
The state already has an official blueprint for protecting the Florida Wildlife Corridor, as a priority subset of the Florida Ecological Greenways Network. I hadn’t heard of this greenways network either until I started paying attention in 2006, when the last controversial toll road – the Heartland Expressway was being proposed. In all the associated media, there was ample discussion of corridors: transportation corridors, development corridors, hurricane evacuation corridors, but no mention of wildlife corridors.
Spend your days with Hayes
Subscribe to our free Stephinitely newsletter
You’re all signed up!
Want more of our free, weekly newsletters in your inbox? Let’s get started.Explore all your options
That inspired me and a group of conservationists to name the Florida Wildlife Corridor, and then later lead three separate expeditions totaling more than 2,000 miles through its length and width. We invited politicians and media to join us, published books and films, and partnered with dozens of Florida conservation organizations to show the world the network of life-sustaining lands and waters that we need to keep connected and whole.
Public good, privately held
Protecting the Florida Wildlife Corridor should be a top priority in the process of planning any new road corridors, and with emphasis on the fact that the Florida Wildlife Corridor’s protection is only 60 percent complete. The nearly 10 million acres of treasured public land in Florida is held together by approximately six million acres of private lands – mostly working forests, ranches and farms – that are crucial for conservation but all at risk of being lost to development, that is if we don’t start planning wildlife corridors and development corridors at the same time.
The thing I appreciate most about the proposed toll roads is that leaders are planning for the future. Florida Chamber of Commerce President Mark Wilson, in his recent column for the Tampa Bay Times, said that Florida’s population is expected to grow by 4.5 million people to reach 26 million by 2030. I agree with these projections, which are consistent with Florida 2070, a study published by the Florida Department of Agriculture, University of Florida and 1000 Friends of Florida, predicting that the state’s population will nearly double to 35 million by 2070.
What’s missing from the case for toll roads, but is made clear in the Florida 2070 report, are the effects of Florida’s expanding population on our natural resources. Based on our current development patterns, with every three million new residents that move to Florida, one million acres of natural habitat is lost. If Florida’s population grows as Wilson and Florida 2070 have predicted, and the development of new roads and housing continues according to current trends, that growth will destroy 5 million acres of high priority wildlife habitat – or nearly all of the missing links in the Florida Wildlife Corridor.
A tight squeeze for wildlife
For those of you who aren’t familiar with the Florida Wildlife Corridor or its missing links, let’s consider the consequences of developing five million acres of the corridor. Foremost, the statewide Florida Wildlife Corridor will be broken, and most of our public conservation lands, including Florida’s award-winning network of state parks, will be surrounded on all sides by development. Natural processes like fire will no longer have space to manage lands without also threatening houses. Conflicts between people and wildlife will rise. The Everglades and the four million acres of connected public lands in South Florida will be cut off from the Everglades Headwaters near Orlando and the rest of the state and country beyond.
Our state animal, the endangered Florida panther, will lose the forests, ranches and farms in that provide its the physical path to recovery. Another wide ranging species, the Florida black bear, will become increasingly isolated. Its seven sub populations spread between Pensacola and Naples will lose connections to one another, leading to inbreeding and local extinctions.
The sources of Florida’s fresh water will be significantly degraded, including the Everglades, St. Johns River, Green Swamp, Peace River and Suwannee River, all which originate within the Florida Wildlife Corridor and provide drinking water to more than three quarters of Florida’s population.
The black bear
Florida agriculture, which provides food for our nation and the world, protects critical wildlife habitat and serves as a robust and sustainable sector of Florida’s economy, will be displaced to the verge of nonexistence.
These might sound like drastic predictions for potential losses associated with three new toll roads. But continued erosion and collapse of Florida’s ecosystems is exactly what’s at stake. We’re already losing 100,000 acres of habitat each a year to development. The toll roads threaten to accelerate that process. Or if we seize this moment to take an honest look at our future, maybe the toll roads can steer us in another direction.
If you read the Florida 2070 report, there is a better option that allows Florida to develop in balance with the green infrastructure that supports us all. As opposed to the Trend 2070, where sprawling development destroys 5 million acres of habitat in the next 50 years, Alternative 2070 benefits from increased investment in land conservation that protects the missing links in the Florida Wildlife Corridor, while steering new development away from the most sensitive lands and closer to our existing urban cores.
Here’s my proposal for the future of Florida: First protect the missing links of the Florida Wildlife Corridor, then we can plan new road and development corridors around secure green corridors without accidentally undermining all of the conservation progress from the past fifty years.
A ranch, a development and a home for panthers
Or if public consensus calls for starting to develop new toll roads now, then at least make a plan to protect the Florida Wildlife Corridor at the same time. If we’re going to consider investing in the toll roads that Wilson called “the most important roadway effort undertaken in Florida since the Florida Turnpike," we need to also commit to the largest new investment in land conservation since Preservation 2000.
Let’s consider how we could achieve both conservation and development. To balance the 100,000 acres lost each year to development, we also need 100,000 acres of new conservation. On the timeline of the toll roads, that means we need a minimum of one million acres of new land conservation by 2030.
I see that as an exciting opportunity. Faced with the climate crises and rapid extinction of species, my colleagues at the National Geographic Society and partnering organizations are working with global leaders towards a new framework of protecting 30 percent of the planet by 2030, on the way to protecting half of Earth by 2050. Right now only 15 percent of Earth’s lands are protected, but in Florida that number is nearly 27 percent. By protecting an additional one million acres, we can reach 30 percent by 2030 and set an inspiring precedent for what can be achieved for conservation even in such a rapidly developing state.
The Florida panther
Most of Florida’s land protection priorities can be achieved by conservation easements, whereby landowners are paid to strip the development rights off of their land and then can continue to manage the land in perpetuity. To fund conservation easements on 100,000 acres annually could cost approximately $500 million. Considering inflation, that is substantially less than the $300 million per year Republican leadership committed in 1990 to Preservation 2000. For additional perspective, $500 million for land conservation is just five percent of the annual $10 billion budget from the Florida Department of Transportation.
Perhaps we make protecting the Florida Wildlife Corridor part of the toll road task force objectives? We’re already bringing regional leaders together over the next year to plan the future of Florida corridors. If their maps show the Florida Wildlife Corridor and we hand them a stack of green dots, I predict logic will lead them to a shared vision for our future.
Let’s at least weigh the idea and let the public decide. Do we want to intentionally save the Florida Wildlife Corridor or let it be destroyed by road corridors and future development? Is there a way for road infrastructure planning to help secure the green infrastructure that all Floridians and visitors need most of all?
After full consideration, if Florida lawmakers indeed go through with spending $20 billion on new toll roads over the next 10 years, can they ensure us that the the statewide Florida Wildlife Corridor is substantially protected at the same time?
Carlton Ward Jr. is an eighth-generation Floridian and National Geographic photographer. His current work focuses on the story of the Florida panther to inspire appreciation and protection of the statewide Florida Wildlife Corridor and is supported by the National Geographic Society. See more of his work at CarltonWard.com and on Instagram @CarltonWard. Learn more about the Florida Wildlife Corridor at FloridaWildlifeCorridor.org.