1. Opinion

Florida’s disabled need an advocate | Editorial

A key program may avoid deep cuts, but state lawmakers should be investing more rather than seeking to cap costs.
A new state report to House Speaker Jose Oliva, R- Miami Lakes and Senate President Bill Galvano, R- Bradenton, underscores the need for more funding for disability services. [SCOTT KEELER | Times] [SCOTT KEELER | Tampa Bay Times]
Published Oct. 7

Advocates are cautiously optimistic that a proposed plan for reforming state assistance to the disabled includes no broad call for cuts in services. If anything, the report is a thoughtful look at the inescapable factors driving the cost of the program. And it offers a robust case for fuller funding of these services for the benefit of clients, their families and taxpayers alike.

In a report to legislative leaders last week, the Agency for Persons with Disabilities and the Agency for Health Care Administration outlined a redesign of the iBudget waiver program. The program provides services to more than 34,500 people with intellectual or developmental disabilities, helping them to live at home or work in their communities as an alternative to institutional care.

Lawmakers have complained for years that the program outspends its budget, and their order for a redesign had advocates fearing deep cuts in services. The recommendations do include some small caps on services like companion care, which could impact about 1,600 people. But the report also suggests shifting some expenses to other areas of Florida’s health care budget, which could save the disability program tens of millions of dollars. One sensible idea for avoiding budget surprises is to have economists from the Legislature and the governor’s office more closely monitor expenses on a regular basis.

But the overriding message is that state lawmakers need to acknowledge reality. Over the last several decades, Florida joined other states in offering supportive services to allow the disabled to remain at home instead of moving into institutional settings. That has enabled tens of thousands of the most vulnerable Floridians to lead happier, more fulfilling lives. More than two-thirds of those enrolled live independently or with their families, compared with 29 percent in licensed residential facilities. And the average cost of home care ($35,000 per person annually) is far cheaper than residential placement ($135,000).

Costs are rising, the report notes, not because of fraud, mismanagement or waste - but because aging clients are requiring more help and their aging caregivers are no longer able to handle the job. A 46-year-old man with cerebral palsy, the report notes, was forced to sit in a dirty diaper until his caregiver arrived in the evenings because his 84-year-old mother could no longer lift him from his wheelchair. And that gap will only increase. Florida is home to more caregivers over age 60 who deal with the disabled than any other state in the country. More families are moving to Florida, and life expectancy is rising along with the number of people with disabilities. Already, more than 21,000 people are on the program’s waiting list.

The budget problem is clear: the state simply isn’t spending enough. Florida ranks 50th out of 51 in the nation (including the District of Columbia), the report notes, in spending on these services as a percentage of statewide personal income. Yet too many lawmakers are looking to cut costs instead of invest more in programs that work, treat the disabled with dignity and save money in the long run. It’s great that this program may avoid deep cuts that would significantly harm families, but Florida should aim higher.

Editorials are the institutional voice of the Tampa Bay Times. The members of the Editorial Board are Times Chairman and CEO Paul Tash, Editor of Editorials Tim Nickens, and editorial writers Elizabeth Djinis, John Hill and Jim Verhulst. Follow @TBTimes_Opinion on Twitter for more opinion news.


  1. President Donald Trump applauds the crowd prior to his address at a campaign rally Thursday, Oct. 10, 2019, in Minneapolis. JIM MONE  |  AP
    Here’s what readers had to say in Monday’s letters to the editor.
  2. President Donald Trump (AP Photo/Evan Vucci); Transcript of Trump conversation with Ukraine's newly elected president Volodymyr Zelenskiy (AP Photo/Wayne Partlow) Associated Press
    Here’s some interesting commentary from the opposite poles of the political spectrum.
  3.  Bill Day --
  4. Dustin Cullison 28, places Spin scooters Wednesday in a designated area for deployment on Zack Street in downtown Tampa. [OCTAVIO JONES   |   Times ]
    The City Council’s proposed ordinance sets reasonable restrictions that should improve safety.
  5. St. Petersburg High, where a video was made showing a student using a whip to strike another student in the back.
    Letting social media get ahead of the truth hurts everyone.
  6. The Florida Capitol. SCOTT KEELER   |   Times
    A federal judge says lawmakers made a mess of the constitutional amendment aimed at restoring felons’ voting rights. But he’s ready to give them one more chance to fix it.
  7. Paula Dockery of Lakeland served in the Florida Legislature for 16 years. Paula Dockery
    The group has been wildly successful in getting conservatives appointed to state and federal courts, columnist Paula Dockery writes.
  8. Times Columnist Dan Ruth. [Times file]
    The senator should not brush off the president’s invitation to China to interfere in U.S. elections, columnist Daniel Ruth writes.
  9. Aaron Corrales, 10, left, talks with his fifth-grade teacher Jessica Morgan about the book Esperanza Rising as part of the class curriculum at Forest Hill Elementary School in Tampa, Florida on Thursday, September 19, 2019. Forest Hills Elementary School is taking part in a new pilot program with materials and curriculum designed by Harvard University to help students improve their reading and writing skills.  OCTAVIO JONES  |  Times
    The school district needs to show a greater sense of urgency.
  10. An oil rig sits off Louisiana in the Gulf of Mexico.
    Here’s what readers had to say in Saturday’s letters to the editor.