Advertisement
  1. Opinion

Science takes a back seat at Trump’s EPA | Editorial

A proposed rule masquerades as transparency when it actually is a favor to polluters.
Exhaust rises from smokestacks in front of piles of coal in Thompsons, Texas. [Associated Press]
Exhaust rises from smokestacks in front of piles of coal in Thompsons, Texas. [Associated Press]
Published Nov. 15

The Trump administration continues to undercut science at the expense of public health. The latest version of a proposed new rule by the Environmental Protection Agency would severely limit the scientific and medical research that forms the basis of public health regulations. This is another attack on facts and a victory for polluters that will only expose Americans to dirtier water and air.

Under a rule the EPA initially proposed in 2018, the agency no longer would consider scientific research unless the underlying data could be made publicly available for peer and industry groups to review. The agency claims the effort, which it calls "Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science,” would boost public confidence in federal regulations by ensuring that the science used in the rule-making process was publicly vetted and verified.

But this is a Trojan Horse that would keep valuable science from the pipeline and allow the nation’s polluters to exploit the vacuum. Many critical studies that connect public health crises to corporate behavior rely on personal health records obtained under patient confidentiality. Without this research, there is no way the EPA could responsibly balance public health as it regulates the nation’s natural resources. Big business would win and the losers would be those Americans suffering from cancer, asthma and other conditions worsened by environmental contaminants.

The EPA insists it could replicate these studies while maintaining patient privacy. But a panel of health experts testifying before a House committee Wednesday called that naive and unworkable, pointing to the costs of redacting patient information and the challenge of protecting personal records in an era of Big Data. The proposed rule, these experts said, would lead to thousands of studies being excluded and a create a chilling effect on future participants that would compromise scientific research. While the EPA said the change would apply only in rule-making cases going forward, it could also be applied to existing regulations when they come up for periodic review. And the EPA administrator would have authority to grant exemptions. Those are recipes for long-term damage, especially at an agency headed by a former coal industry lobbyist.

“The proposed rule will force the EPA to make decisions based on less information, which will compromise its mission to protect human health,” Todd Sherer, CEO of the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, told the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology on Wednesday. “Instead of promoting transparency,” noted another panelist, Dr. Mary B. Rice, a critical care physician and assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, “this rule would decrease transparency, by giving the EPA administrator unchecked authority to pick and choose which research studies will inform policies that affect the health of the U.S. population.”

The agency expects to finalize the rule in early 2020 after another public comment period. This is another gift from this administration to big polluters at the expense of Americans’ health.

Editorials are the institutional voice of the Tampa Bay Times. The members of the Editorial Board are Times Chairman and CEO Paul Tash, Editor of Editorials Tim Nickens, and editorial writers Elizabeth Djinis, John Hill and Jim Verhulst. Follow @TBTimes_Opinion on Twitter for more opinion news

ALSO IN THIS SECTION

  1. 8 minutes ago• Opinion
    Mexico's Treasury Secretary Arturo Herrera, left, Deputy Prime Minister of Canada Chrystia Freeland, second left, Mexico's President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, center, Mexico's top trade negotiator Jesus Seade, second right, and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, hold the documents after signing an update to the North American Free Trade Agreement, at the national palace in Mexico City on Tuesday. (AP Photo/Marco Ugarte) [MARCO UGARTE  |  AP]
    The new North American trade pact is good for the nation and for Florida.
  2. Dwight D. Eisenhower (center) in front of a grid the SS had fashioned from railway tracks for the purpose of burning the corpses of dead inmates from the mass graves, April 12, 1945 [MOORE, U.S. SIGNAL CORPS  |  National Archives Washington]
    Some things are not up for debate. The Holocaust happened, write two officials from the Florida Holocaust Museum.
  3. There are great programs in Hillsborough public schools to provide free or low-cost breakfast and lunch for students who qualify.
    Proposed changes by the Trump administration would make some students go hungry.
  4. A CH-47 Chinook helicopter takes off after dropping soldiers in Bagh village of Khakeran Valley, Zabul province, Afghanistan. [TOMAS MUNITA  |  AP]
    Here’s what readers had to say in Wedneday’s letters to the editor.
  5. Technology jobs in industries including aerospace are highly coveted. A SpaceX Falcon heavy rocket lifts off from the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral earlier this year. (AP Photo/John Raoux)
    Five metro areas dominate high-tech employment. There isn’t a Florida city among them.
  6.  [Bill Day -- FloridaPolitics.com]
  7. Yesterday• Letters to the Editor
    Pinellas County tourism officials are selling area beaches in two places that need them most this time of year: NYC and Chicago. [Tampa Tribune]
    Here’s what readers had to say in Tuesday’s letters to the editor.
  8. Acting Navy Secretary Thomas Modly, center, and Navy Adm. Michael Gilday, Chief of Naval Operations, look on as an Air Force carry team moves a transfer case containing the remains of Navy Seaman Mohammed Sameh Haitham, of St. Petersburg on Sunday at Dover Air Force Base, Del. A Saudi gunman killed three people including Haitham in a shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen) [CLIFF OWEN  |  AP]
    Service members like Mohammed “Mo” Haitham of St. Petersburg should not be at risk of being killed on a base in their home state.
  9. The effects of Red Tide are seen at Pass-a-Grille Beach in St. Petersburg in Sept. 2018 where hundreds, perhaps thousands of fish lie dead on the beach. [MARTHA ASENCIO RHINE  |  Tampa Bay Times]
    A state task force meets this week in St. Petersburg to listen and discuss the options.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement