1. Opinion

There’s no reason a child should be denied free school lunch | Editorial

Proposed changes by the Trump administration would make some students go hungry.
There are great programs in Hillsborough public schools to provide free or low-cost breakfast and lunch for students who qualify.
There are great programs in Hillsborough public schools to provide free or low-cost breakfast and lunch for students who qualify.
Published Dec. 10, 2019

When a child goes hungry, the whole world suffers. There is absolutely no reason that the Trump administration should limit who qualifies for the federal food stamps program when that decision could put nearly 200,000 children in the state of Florida and 982,000 nationally at risk of losing their direct enrollment in free school lunches. These are children who might otherwise not have any food that day, and the process should be as easy as possible for families to ensure their children have access to free lunch.

This summer, the U.S. Department of Agriculture proposed stricter guidelines to be eligible for the nation’s SNAP program, commonly referred to as food stamps. A new October analysis from the Food and Nutrition Service showed just how many children nationwide that would impact: almost one million. Now students whose parents are already on SNAP benefits are automatically enrolled in the free school lunch program. If these policy changes go through, about 45 percent of the 982,000 children whose families would lose out on the SNAP program would still be eligible for free lunch, according to the analysis. But that leaves 55 percent. While many of those will still qualify for reduced lunch, that is an extra cost burden on parents who have not traditionally expected it. What about those children? Even for those who do qualify, parents could get lost in the shuffle of additional paperwork and applications and leave children to be caught in the middle.

The proof is in the numbers. At least half of the students in all four Tampa Bay school districts — Pinellas, Pasco, Hillsborough and Hernando — are on free or reduced lunch. In Hillsborough County, about 62 percent of students this year were on free or reduced lunch, and 47 percent are direct certified. That almost half of the students are direct certified shows the potential impact of the changes. In other counties, like Pasco and Hernando, the immediate effects are less severe. While about 54 percent of Pasco’s students are on free or reduced lunch, only 580 of those students will be affected by proposed changes to the SNAP program. Of those, about 96 percent still qualify under the application process, leaving about 25 students in the middle.

But even one student going hungry is too many. Local school districts are already planning how they will notify parents if the federal government goes ahead with these changes. The plan in Pasco is to notify every affected household through letters, emails and phone calls to make sure they apply for the school lunch program. Hillsborough also plans to ramp up messaging starting next summer. Students will have 30 days to receive their previous benefits and then families will have to apply or students will no longer receive free school lunch. For these students, lunch is often the only time they will get nutritious food.

School lunches have changed drastically since the early days of slogging through a cafeteria line, holding your nose and hoping for the best. Schools now prioritize healthy items and vegetarian or vegan options for students’ diverse dietary restrictions. Some school districts have made locally-sourced food a top initiative, exposing students to items like beef, milk and squash that is locally grown or locally produced.

There should be no unnecessary barriers for poor students to get a free school lunch. The very least the federal government can do is ensure there will be no change to this program for students. They are the most impacted and the most helpless.

Editorials are the institutional voice of the Tampa Bay Times. The members of the Editorial Board are Times Chairman and CEO Paul Tash, Editor of Editorials Tim Nickens, and editorial writers Elizabeth Djinis, John Hill and Jim Verhulst. Follow @TBTimes_Opinion on Twitter for more opinion news.


  1. House impeachment manager Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., speaks during the impeachment trial against President Donald Trump in the Senate at the U.S. Capitol in Washington. [AP]
    The core of Trump’s argument is a novel interpretation of the law: Whatever the president did, it’s not impeachable, writes Doyle McManus.
  2. A patient receives a flu shot.
    Here’s what readers are saying in Thursday’s letters to the editor
  3. Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg and President Donald Trump [Associated Press]
    Only a white man would think that someone in his mid-30s, with no experience running anything of any great consequence, would be qualified to be president, writes the columnist.
  4. Leonard Pitts [undefined]
    The most important verdict will be rendered by jurors not in the Senate, but in the court of public opinion, writes Leonard Pitts.
  5. Addison Davis, Clay County Superintendent, was chosen Tuesday as Hillsborough County's new schools superintendent [HCPS]
    Addison Davis will have an impact on the entire region.
  6. About 100 people gathered on Bayshore Boulevard in remembrance of George Gage, who was killed at Bayshore Boulevard and West Julia Street. [LUIS SANTANA  |  Times]
    Here’s what readers are saying in Wednesday’s letters to the editor
  7. The Trump National Doral clubhouse in Doral. [WILFREDO LEE  |  AP]
    National Republican leaders should make it known that they understand that Florida — with its 1,200-plus miles of valuable coastline — is ground zero for the growing and costly threat of sea-level...
  8. Justices of the Florida Supreme Court attend the opening session of the Florida Legislature in January. Left to Right: Chief Justice Charles T. Canady, Justice Ricky Polston, Justice Jorge Labarga, Justice Alan Lawson, and Justice Carlos G. Muniz.  (Two vacant justice positions need to be appointed by Gov. Ron DeSantis.) [SCOTT KEELER  |  Tampa Bay Times]
    It’s bad enough the court ignored voter intent on restoring felons’ voting rights. It also embraced the rigid approach of the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.
  9. Health experts say that the people who benefit most from fluoridation are the poor, who often don't have access to the foods and dental health products they need to keep their teeth in good shape.
    A retired dentist reminds us of the value of having fluoridated the water systems.