Practical path on climate change
Climate threat is immediate | Column, Jan. 30
This column achieves a much-needed focus on climate change. Too often, we bemoan — without action. The key requisite to surmounting inertia on this issue, as noted in this column, is to hold end users economically harmless. This is how we moved our energy sources from people and animals, to wood, to coal, to whales, to oil and gas, to nuclear, hydro, solar and wind and who knows what comes next.
All systematic energy transitions have been based on self-interested free choice by consumers, and producer innovation that shifts demand. None have been predictable at the outset. Past conversions required neither the best-guess favoritism of politicians for particular strategies, nor upon the politicians’ capacity to collect new revenue from taxation to spend as they choose.
Keep it simple. Just tax what we don’t want, and we will have less of it, and rebate 100 percent of the tax to end users. Making people choose whether they can afford to drive to work, stay comfortable, cook their meals or use their myriad electrical devices sustains the attitude: “I’ll take my chances with less beach and hotter days.”
Pat Byrne, Largo
Just let felons vote
Is state fair to felons on voting? | Jan. 29
All this legal wrangling over Amendment 4 ignores a basic question: Why disenfranchise anyone? What does voting have to do with the criminal justice system or public safety? Two states, Maine and Vermont, even let people vote behind bars. Everyone. Sixteen states and the District of Columbia let felons vote as soon as they get out of jail. No harm is done.
Pete Wilford, Holiday
House failed in its duty
This editorial is an ill-advised attempt to trick readers into believing the Senate did not do its job. It’s not the Senate’s job to investigate and question witnesses. That is what the House was supposed to do.
John L. Hemmings, Clearwater
A slur, not a slip of the tongue
Council member apologizes for slur | Jan. 30
Shame, shame, shame on Tampa City Council member Orlando Gudes. I am sure he is offended by people who use the “n” word, and I can think of many other things that would probably offend him as a black/African American. His excuse is as offensive as his use of such an anti-Semitic slur. To say he spoke in the moment — really! And, then he talks of his Jewish friends. I am a Jewish woman, and I don’t have just one or two black friends. I have many. My husband and I moved to this area five years ago and, in that time, we have had numerous guests stay in our home who are black. We drove to Jacksonville to attend the wedding of two friends and the mother of one of them refers to me as her son’s “white mother.” I could go on and on, but I don’t need to.
Linda Hansen, Largo
Wrestling with politics
Trial shifts to sharp questions | Jan. 30
I was watching the impeachment hearings Wednesday evening until I got bored and switched to professional wrestling. I switched back at 10 p.m. It was then that I realized that I could only tell the difference between the wrestling and the hearing because the participants were dressed differently.
Gerald Taylor, Wesley Chapel