Is the United States doing enough coronavirus testing? No, it’s not even close, if we look at the rest of the world. We’ve all heard that testing is a measure of how effectively a country is responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. It not only helps us identify cases for treatment, it also enables contact tracing to identify other cases and control the spread of the pandemic. But how do we measure testing? And which countries are doing well? As we’ll see, the United States does not score high.
It’s been said that the United States has performed more testing than the rest of the world combined. Not so – while the United States had reported 4.7 million tests through April 23, that’s only 19% of the 24.7 million tests reported worldwide. And that worldwide total excludes both China, which provides no test information to the WHO, and Taiwan, which has been hailed for its strong response to the pandemic, but which has no relationship with the WHO.
COVID-19 has hit the United States especially hard. Only four countries with populations above 5 million have seen more cases per capita; fully 33% of the world’s reported cases are in the United States. It stands to reason that the number of tests a country performs must depend partly on how widespread the pandemic is in that country. Even so, while we’ve had nearly one-third of the world’s cases, we’ve only performed less than one-fifth of the tests.
It’s widely understood that:
1. A significant amount of testing is driven simply by the number of cases, and
2. Additional testing beyond that is strategic and preventive.
Comparing total cases to tests performed will give us a sense of how well a nation addresses both objectives. To level the playing field, we must look at both metrics on a per-capita basis. This chart compares 45 countries, which collectively have reported 90% of the world’s COVID-19 cases:
The bubble graph format enables us to add a third dimension of information: the country’s population. Also, the “wealthy west” data points – western Europe, the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand – are colored differently. The wealth and sophisticated healthcare systems of that group of countries should put them at the forefront of using testing as a preventive measure, especially since many of them have been hit so hard by COVID-19.
The upward-sloping red line added to the graph reflects the notion that some amount of testing is driven simply by caseload. Countries right on that line are doing the minimum testing necessary to manage the existing cases. Countries that sit well above that line are using testing strategically, to identify hard-to-spot cases and to manage the future spread of the pandemic. Of the countries with more than 1,000 cases per million population, only a few – Iran, U.K., France, Belgium, and Spain – sit right up against that red line. Not only is each one of those countries among the countries hardest hit by the pandemic, they tend to have a significantly higher case fatality rate – that is, total deaths divided by total cases – than the other countries shown (with the tragic exception of Italy). Belgium’s case fatality rate, for example, is the highest in the world, other than tiny San Marino’s. A lower rate may be partly explained by the fact that more testing uncovers more asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 cases.
Compared to the other countries, the U.S. testing per capita is in the middle of the pack. But no country with as many cases per capita has performed fewer tests per capita. Russia, for example, has done more testing than the United States, even though it has reported less than one-fifth the number of cases per capita than the U.S. And Venezuela, with only a few hundred reported COVID-19 cases, has done nearly as much testing per capita as the U.S. (if Venezuela’s information is accurate).
All this data suggests that countries are addressing the testing challenge in wildly different ways. The data also suggests that the countries having the hardest time with the pandemic tend to be the ones doing the least amount of testing. More effective, better organized testing must be a top priority at all levels in the United States.
Spend your days with Hayes
Subscribe to our free Stephinitely newsletter
You’re all signed up!
Want more of our free, weekly newsletters in your inbox? Let’s get started.Explore all your options
Randall Bolten is a Silicon Valley CFO, data scientist, professor in the University of California, Berkeley, Extension School and author of the book “Painting with Numbers: Presenting Financials and Other Numbers So People Will Understand You.”